Final Environmental Impact Statement
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Final Environmental Impact Statement
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Vestal <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> Chapter 3<br />
96<br />
eared bat<br />
(Corynorhinus<br />
townsendii)<br />
Hoary bat<br />
(Lasiurus cinereus)<br />
Summary of Effects on R2 Sensitive Species<br />
Fire hazard and MPB risk would<br />
remain very high. Wildfire could<br />
change the microhabitat of roosting<br />
sites and may affect insect<br />
populations which would reduce<br />
prey for bats.<br />
Possible long-term loss of roosting<br />
habitat due to MPB activity.<br />
Incremental impacts to habitat<br />
quantity are expected to be<br />
minimal.<br />
Potential for direct impacts and disturbance.<br />
Reduced fire hazard. Possible long-term<br />
loss of roosting habitat due to MPB activity,<br />
but to a lesser degree than No Action.<br />
Prescribed burning could affect air quality in<br />
cave and mine roosts, and may contribute to<br />
the loss of existing snag roost habitat. Fire is<br />
known to affect insect populations which<br />
could reduce prey items for bats foraging in<br />
the area.<br />
Cumulative Effects<br />
The proposed action for this project is not<br />
expected to influence spread of white-nosed<br />
syndrome. There is only one known<br />
abandoned mine, which is gated to prohibit<br />
unauthorized entry.<br />
Incremental impacts to habitat quantity are<br />
expected to be minimal for both alternatives<br />
because direct and indirect impacts are<br />
expected to be minimal. The effects of<br />
disturbance are expected to be minimal since<br />
bats are normally active during the night<br />
when project activities would be minimal.<br />
Summary<br />
The alternatives ‘may adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a<br />
loss of viability in the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward federal listing’.<br />
The proposed action would likely have the more impact on the bat species due to the<br />
larger acreage of treatment, but it is also expected to retain more live trees into the<br />
future. The proposed action would meet Forest Plan standards and guidelines. The<br />
Forest is conserving and enhancing habitat for this species through cave and mine<br />
management therefore, both alternatives contribute to conservation of bat habitat<br />
Forest plan Objective 221. Therefore, this species is likely to persist on the Forest.<br />
Alternative 1<br />
No Action<br />
Fire hazard would remain very<br />
high. Wildfire could change the<br />
microhabitat of roosting sites and<br />
may affect insect populations which<br />
would reduce prey for bats.<br />
MPB activity is expected to<br />
continue and may result in longterm<br />
loss of roosting habitat.<br />
Direct and Indirect Effects<br />
Alternative 2<br />
Proposed Action<br />
Potential for direct impacts and disturbance.<br />
Reduced fire hazard. Short-term decrease in<br />
habitat, but it’s expected that more live large<br />
trees would remain with this alternative.<br />
May have a short-term effect on prey base.<br />
Hardwood acres would be expected to<br />
increase, which would contribute to more<br />
roosting sites. MPB activity is expected to<br />
continue and may result in long-term loss of<br />
roosting habitat, but to a lesser degree than<br />
No Action.<br />
Prescribed burning could affect air quality in<br />
cave and mine roosts, and may contribute to<br />
the loss of existing snag roost habitat. Fire is<br />
known to affect insect populations which<br />
could reduce prey items for bats foraging in<br />
the area.