13.08.2013 Views

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Final Environmental Impact Statement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Vestal <strong>Final</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Statement</strong> Chapter 3<br />

96<br />

eared bat<br />

(Corynorhinus<br />

townsendii)<br />

Hoary bat<br />

(Lasiurus cinereus)<br />

Summary of Effects on R2 Sensitive Species<br />

Fire hazard and MPB risk would<br />

remain very high. Wildfire could<br />

change the microhabitat of roosting<br />

sites and may affect insect<br />

populations which would reduce<br />

prey for bats.<br />

Possible long-term loss of roosting<br />

habitat due to MPB activity.<br />

Incremental impacts to habitat<br />

quantity are expected to be<br />

minimal.<br />

Potential for direct impacts and disturbance.<br />

Reduced fire hazard. Possible long-term<br />

loss of roosting habitat due to MPB activity,<br />

but to a lesser degree than No Action.<br />

Prescribed burning could affect air quality in<br />

cave and mine roosts, and may contribute to<br />

the loss of existing snag roost habitat. Fire is<br />

known to affect insect populations which<br />

could reduce prey items for bats foraging in<br />

the area.<br />

Cumulative Effects<br />

The proposed action for this project is not<br />

expected to influence spread of white-nosed<br />

syndrome. There is only one known<br />

abandoned mine, which is gated to prohibit<br />

unauthorized entry.<br />

Incremental impacts to habitat quantity are<br />

expected to be minimal for both alternatives<br />

because direct and indirect impacts are<br />

expected to be minimal. The effects of<br />

disturbance are expected to be minimal since<br />

bats are normally active during the night<br />

when project activities would be minimal.<br />

Summary<br />

The alternatives ‘may adversely impact individuals, but not likely to result in a<br />

loss of viability in the Planning Area, nor cause a trend toward federal listing’.<br />

The proposed action would likely have the more impact on the bat species due to the<br />

larger acreage of treatment, but it is also expected to retain more live trees into the<br />

future. The proposed action would meet Forest Plan standards and guidelines. The<br />

Forest is conserving and enhancing habitat for this species through cave and mine<br />

management therefore, both alternatives contribute to conservation of bat habitat<br />

Forest plan Objective 221. Therefore, this species is likely to persist on the Forest.<br />

Alternative 1<br />

No Action<br />

Fire hazard would remain very<br />

high. Wildfire could change the<br />

microhabitat of roosting sites and<br />

may affect insect populations which<br />

would reduce prey for bats.<br />

MPB activity is expected to<br />

continue and may result in longterm<br />

loss of roosting habitat.<br />

Direct and Indirect Effects<br />

Alternative 2<br />

Proposed Action<br />

Potential for direct impacts and disturbance.<br />

Reduced fire hazard. Short-term decrease in<br />

habitat, but it’s expected that more live large<br />

trees would remain with this alternative.<br />

May have a short-term effect on prey base.<br />

Hardwood acres would be expected to<br />

increase, which would contribute to more<br />

roosting sites. MPB activity is expected to<br />

continue and may result in long-term loss of<br />

roosting habitat, but to a lesser degree than<br />

No Action.<br />

Prescribed burning could affect air quality in<br />

cave and mine roosts, and may contribute to<br />

the loss of existing snag roost habitat. Fire is<br />

known to affect insect populations which<br />

could reduce prey items for bats foraging in<br />

the area.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!