NEPA--Environmental Assessment
NEPA--Environmental Assessment
NEPA--Environmental Assessment
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
equires that a cause and effect relationship be established that is not merely speculative or based on<br />
remote possibilities. Principals of population ecology using the concept of species limiting factors<br />
as they relate to reproduction, growth, mortality rates, and distribution of MIS are applied whenever<br />
possible.<br />
Most MIS species analyzed in detail have either been observed or reported on NFS lands in the<br />
Silverton Landscape. Additionally, most MIS species have habitat that is well distributed across the<br />
San Juan National Forest, with the exception of Colorado River cutthroat trout and Uncompahgre<br />
fritillary butterfly. It should also be noted that within and adjacent to NFS lands in the Silverton<br />
Landscape there are large amounts of habitat in similar condition, and this habitat is well distributed<br />
across the landscape and connected to the larger National Forest administrative unit. The Silverton<br />
Landscape does not provide unique or isolated habitats within which discrete populations are<br />
restricted. Aside from Canada lynx and southwestern willow flycatcher, most MIS are not species at<br />
risk nor are they species that are trending towards protected status and are well distributed across the<br />
San Juan National Forest.<br />
For some species, such as mule deer and elk, there appears to be no relationship between habitat<br />
trends and population trends, with population trends regulated by State hunting season structures.<br />
For other species, such as Canada lynx and river otter, population trends are dependant primarily on<br />
the results of Colorado Division of Wildlife reintroduction efforts, rather than the amount or<br />
distribution of habitat on National Forest System lands. For other species, such as deer mouse,<br />
populations are highly variable and regulated primarily by local annual weather patterns, rather than<br />
the amount or distribution of habitat. Again, MIS regulations do not apply to non-National Forest<br />
System lands and thus this analysis will be limited solely to those species and acres of habitat that<br />
occur on National Forest System lands.<br />
AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT<br />
There are 23 species identified as MIS in the SJNF Forest Plan. Some species are not present in the<br />
Silverton Landscape due to the absence of suitable habitat, or, suitable habitat is present in the<br />
landscape but the proposed action (domestic sheep grazing) will not affect the species or its key<br />
habitat components. Table C-3 (Appendix C) provides rationale for why some MIS species were<br />
brought forward for detailed project analysis and other species were not. A total of five species have<br />
habitat present in the Silverton Landscape and may be affected by domestic sheep grazing (Table 3-<br />
1, below). The five species brought forward for detailed analysis for this range analysis project<br />
include: Canada lynx, elk, mule deer, green-tailed towhee, and mountain bluebird. Affects of<br />
domestic sheep grazing to federally listed species (Canada lynx) was also discussed in the project’s<br />
Biological <strong>Assessment</strong>. Affects to Forest Service designated Sensitive Species were also discussed<br />
in the project’s Biological Evaluation.<br />
Existing habitat for each MIS was determined by the use of a computer mapping model using<br />
vegetative information described in Forest-wide MIS <strong>Assessment</strong>s on National Forest System lands.<br />
Habitat modeling was conducted using habitat structural stage matrices described by Towry (1984).<br />
In addition, information on species’ distribution across the Forest, professional judgment of FS<br />
wildlife biologists, coordination with CDOW biologists, coordination with the U.S. Fish and<br />
Wildlife Service, and field reconnaissance of the project area was also used.<br />
A brief description of suitable habitat for each MIS species brought forward for detailed project<br />
analysis, their likely period of use, and Forest-wide habitat and population trend estimates for each<br />
of these MIS species are provided in the Wildlife Review (Schultz 2009c) in the project record.<br />
More detailed information about species natural history requirements, distribution, and habitat and<br />
population trends is on file at the Columbine Ranger District Office located in Bayfield, Colorado<br />
87