13.08.2013 Views

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

egulated by fixed livestock numbers or seasons of use. It can be compared to a performance-based<br />

contract that is written with specifications for the end results, rather than written with detailed<br />

specifications on how to accomplish the job.<br />

Under adaptive management, the proposed action is a set of specific initial actions that are chosen as<br />

the starting point believed to best meet or move toward desired conditions in rangeland health,<br />

vegetation composition and abundance, and watershed conditions relative to livestock grazing within<br />

the landscape, and is designed to meet Forest Plan standards and guidelines. This initial course of<br />

proposed action is described below:<br />

The proposed action would reissue eight grazing permits on the following active allotments:, Deer<br />

Park, Elk Creek, Engine Creek/Deer Creek Eureka/California Gulch, Gladstone, Maggie Gulch,<br />

Picayne/Mineral Point, and Red Mountain.<br />

Four vacant allotments would be closed to grazing; Little Molas/West Needles, Minnie Gulch,<br />

Needles Mountains, and West Lime.<br />

Two vacant allotments would be designated as forage reserves: Flume and Graysill.<br />

Incorporate Design Criteria as described below.<br />

Design Criteria for Alternative 3<br />

Design Criteria Those design criteria as indicated in Tables 2-1 and 2-2 (p.29+) by an “x” in the<br />

Alternative 3 column are included as part of Alternative 3. These criteria apply to all active<br />

allotments across the landscape at all times.<br />

Site-Specific Design Criteria for Alternative 3<br />

The design criteria above are applicable to the entire project area. During 2008 field analysis, some<br />

specific locations were identified as having a “need for change”. These sites were determined to<br />

have a need for change if they do not currently meet the Desired Condition. See Figure 2-1.<br />

Deer Park Allot<br />

• Grazing rotations will be designed to minimize conflict with recreation use to the extent possible<br />

in the following areas: Spencer Basin and Highland Mary Lakes, especially during high traffic<br />

times, holiday weekends, wildflower season etc. (S-S.1)<br />

• Reduce the time spent on the west side of the Highland Mary Lakes Basin – in order to do so,<br />

make up more days on other areas of the allotment like Spencer Basin, Kendall Gulch, Deer<br />

Park, and the area on the east side of the Highland Mary lakes. ( S-S.2)<br />

• Move the allotment boundary with Elk Creek Allotment to the top of the basin east of Highland<br />

Mary lakes so that the Deer Park band can use the east side of the lakes basin. (S-S.3)<br />

• No bedding within ¼ mile of the lakes (S-S.4)<br />

After 2-3 grazing seasons, re-visit the bed grounds. If still not in satisfactory condition:<br />

• Change ingress/egress route to Kendall Gulch, improving rotation scheme. (S-S.5)<br />

• And/or change the class of livestock to yearlings. (S-S.6)<br />

After 2-3 more grazing seasons, re-visit the bed grounds, If still not in satisfactory condition:<br />

• Remove the Highland Mary Lakes basin from grazing and reduce the total grazing season by<br />

appropriate number of days. (S-S.7)<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!