13.08.2013 Views

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

approximately 9,030 acres (28%) of the total BLM acres within project area are generally suitable<br />

for grazing (Figure 1-2).<br />

Resource Management Plans establish programmatic direction for the management of BLM lands.<br />

General Grazing Objectives in the RMP state: “Maintaining or improving the vegetation component<br />

of the ecosystem is key to enhancing the resource values of the planning area to permit a balanced<br />

mix of uses to ensure sustained yield. (p.5)”<br />

BLM policy directs the BLM to focus available funding and resources on those areas where<br />

problems and conflicts exist. The RMP places grazing allotments in one of three categories: “I”,<br />

Improve; “M”, Maintain; or “C”, Custodial. The allotments in this landscape are all considered “M”<br />

class - Maintain current satisfactory conditions - and will accordingly, receive attention as a second<br />

priority (RMP p.6).<br />

The RMP designates the BLM areas within the project boundary as emphasis areas:<br />

• A - Livestock Management – “Manage suitable vegetation types for increased, sustained livestock production. One<br />

goal is to improve range condition and productivity on native rangelands. Use improved management systems such<br />

as rest-rotation and deferred-rotation if appropriate…Develop AMP’s on 71 priority allotments. (p.27)”<br />

• C - Recreation – “Manage livestock under reduced intensity to utilize available forage and maintain plant vigor<br />

while not degrading recreation values…Manage livestock grazing to make it compatible with recreation use.<br />

(p.35)”<br />

• Kw - Municipal Watershed – “Manage suitable vegetation types under low to moderate intensity for livestock<br />

production with the intent to use available forage and maintain plant vigor. Reduce the number and/or season of use<br />

for livestock where needed to achieve soil and water program objectives. (p.55)” This Management Area is found<br />

within the project area boundary, but not within an active allotment.<br />

These are used as the foundation to compare the current conditions of allotments to the desired<br />

conditions for the allotments. The desired condition is then further defined at the project level (p.19).<br />

An examination of whether each applicable RMP direction item is being met can be found in the<br />

project record. A brief summary of that examination reveals that RMP direction is being met, or<br />

conditions are moving towards the described direction.<br />

Allotment Management Plans (AMP’s) and <strong>NEPA</strong> Analysis<br />

While the Forest Plan/RMP establishes the general suitability of an area for livestock grazing, the<br />

decision to authorize livestock grazing on a particular area of land is the outcome of a<br />

comprehensive, integrated resource analysis for the particular allotment(s). This analysis, conducted<br />

according to <strong>NEPA</strong>, is required in order to authorize livestock grazing on the project area, to<br />

prescribe site-specific management of the rangeland resources, and to ensure management is capable<br />

of meeting or moving toward desired conditions. Analysis and associated decisions made at this<br />

level are documented in an EA (such as this document) or an EIS and a decision document, and<br />

implemented through the permit, AMP, and annual operating instructions.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!