13.08.2013 Views

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

NEPA--Environmental Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Specific Management Emphasis Areas (Figure 1-3) also have Direction, Standards, and Guidelines<br />

associated with them.<br />

• 1B: Emphasis is on winter sports areas (III-93)<br />

o Manage livestock grazing to enhance recreation opportunities in existing and proposed recreation sites.<br />

(III-94)<br />

o Utilize low investment management systems such as season-long or deferred grazing, unless improved<br />

management systems are warranted in conjunction with management of adjacent areas. (III-95)<br />

• 2A: Emphasis is on semi-primitive motorized recreation opportunities (III-105)<br />

o Manage livestock distribution and stocking rates to be compatible with recreation use. Locate<br />

structural improvements to meet visual quality objectives. (III_109)<br />

o Utilize extensive management systems such as season-long or deferred grazing. (III-109)<br />

o Protect regeneration from livestock damage in areas managed for timber production. (III-110)<br />

o Construct and maintain [structural improvements] necessary to implement management systems. Use<br />

on-site or rustic materials and mechanical methods compatible with prescription objectives. (III-110)<br />

• 2B: Emphasis is on rural and roaded-natural recreation opportunities (III-118)<br />

o Manage livestock distribution and stocking rates to be compatible with recreation use. Locate<br />

structural improvements to meet visual quality objectives. (III-122)<br />

o Utilize extensive management systems such as season-long or deferred grazing. (III-122)<br />

o Protect regeneration from livestock damage. (III-122)<br />

o Construct and maintain [structural improvements] necessary to implement management systems. Use<br />

on-site or rustic materials and mechanical methods compatible with prescription objectives. (III-123)<br />

• 3A: Emphasis is on semi-primitive non-motorized recreation in roaded or non-roaded areas (III-130)<br />

o Manage livestock distribution and stocking rates to be compatible with recreation use. Locate<br />

structural improvements to meet visual quality objectives. (III-133)<br />

o Utilize extensive management systems such as season-long or deferred grazing. (III-133)<br />

o Construct and maintain allotment boundary fences, short drift fences and water developments<br />

necessary to implement management systems. Use on-site or rustic materials and mechanical methods<br />

compatible with prescription objectives. (III-134)<br />

• 6B: Emphasis is on livestock grazing (III-179)<br />

o Use only intensive grazing systems or remove livestock when recovery of range condition cannot be<br />

accomplished by an intensive grazing system. (III-187)<br />

o Improve range condition to fair or better or forage value rating to moderately high or better. (III-187)<br />

• 7E: Emphasis is on wood-fiber production and utilization (III-209)<br />

o Utilize improved management systems such as rest-rotation, deferred rotation, rotation, or alternate<br />

years. (III-216)<br />

o Utilize transitory forage that is available where demand exists and where investments in regeneration<br />

can be protected. (III-216)<br />

o Protect regeneration from livestock damage. (III-216)<br />

• 1.11-1.13: Emphasis is on wilderness values. (FP Amendment #20)<br />

o Livestock grazing activities shall be permitted in accordance with congressional guidelines.<br />

FSM2320.5 (II-26 in Amendment 20)<br />

This Plan guidance is used as the foundation to compare the current conditions of allotments to the<br />

desired conditions for the allotments. The desired condition is then further defined at the project<br />

level (p.19). An examination of whether each applicable Forest Plan direction item is being met can<br />

be found in the project record. A brief summary of that examination reveals that Forest Plan<br />

direction, standards and guidelines for grazing are generally being met, with the exception of<br />

reducing the total acreage of noxious weeds, and the reasons for not meeting this direction are not<br />

attributed to grazing.<br />

Resource Management Plan<br />

Livestock grazing has been determined by the San Juan/San Miguel Resource Management Plan<br />

(1985), hereafter referred to as the RMP, to be an appropriate use of the project area based in part on<br />

the RMP’s suitability determinations. RMP-level analysis for grazing has determined that<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!