A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab
70 TABLE 17 Effectiveness Summary of the results of primary analyses for key outcomes included in this review TNF inhibitor ACR20 ACR70 HAQ change Modified Sharp score Withdrawal for SAEs Serious infections and population RR a : (95% CI) RRa : (95% CI) Mean differenceb Mean differenceb any reasons RRc (95% CI) RRc (95% CI) (and NNT) (and NNT) (95% CI) (95% CI) RRc (95% CI) (and NNH) Anti-TNF vs MTX Adalimuma 0.88 (0.75 to 1.03) 0.99 (0.75 to 1.30) 0.00 (–0.13 to 0.13) –2.70 (–4.74 to –0.66)/ 1.14 (0.91 to 1.43) [Commercial-in- [Commercial-in- (early RA) b 1 year, –4.90 confidence confidence ([Commercial-in- information information removed] confidence information removed] removed])/2 years Etanercept 1.22 (1.06 to 1.40) 1.23 (0.89 to 1.70) –0.10 (–0.23 to 0.03) –0.97 (–1.65 to –0.29)/ 0.63 (0.48 to 0.84) NR 0.82 (0.31 to 2.15) (early RA) NNT 7.7 1 year (4.5 to 25.0) Etanercept 1.28 (1.06 to 1.54) 1.46 (1.00 to 2.14) –0.10 (–0.23 to 0.03) –2.28 (–4.11 to –0.45)/ 0.81 (0.65 to 1.00) 1.10 (0.75 to 1.61) 0.95 (0.85 to 1.06) (established RA) NNT 8.3 1 year (4.8 to 33.3) Anti-TNF versus placebo Adalimumab 2.11 (1.84 to 2.42) 5.22 (3.45 to 7.89) –0.31 (–0.36 to –0.26) –2.20 (–3.33 to –1.07)/ 0.62 (0.53 to 0.73) 1.05 (0.78 to 1.41) 2.35 (1.00 to 5.53) (established RA) NNT 3.6 (3.1 to 4.2) NNT 7.7 (5.9, 11.1) 1 year Etanercept 3.59 (2.89 to 4.46) 9.44 (3.98 to 22.38) –0.50 (–0.59 to –0.42) No data available 0.37 (0.29 to 0.46) 1.25 (0.75 to 2.08) 0.78 (0.37 to 1.62) (established RA) NNT 2.1 (1.9 to 2.4) NNT 7.7 (6.3 to 10.0) Infliximab 2.30 (1.90 to 2.78) 3.16 (1.89 to 5.27) –0.27 (–0.35 to –0.19) –5.70 (–8.58 to –2.82)/ 0.76 (0.36 to 1.60) 0.84 (0.56 to 1.26) 0.61 (0.26 to 1.46) (established RA) NNT 3.2 (2.7 to 4.0) NNT 11.1 (7.7 to 20.0) 1 year Anti-TNF + MTX vs MTX Adalimumab + MTX 1.24 (1.08 to 1.42) 1.64 (1.30 to 2.07) –0.10 (–0.23 to 0.03) –4.40 (–6.14 to –2.66)/ 0.71 (0.54 to 0.93) [Commercial-in- [Commercial-in- (early RA) NNT 7.7 (4.5 to 20.0) NNT 5.6 (3.8 to 10.0) 1 year [Commercial-in- confidence confidence confidence information information information removed] removed] removed] Etanercept + MTX 1.49 (1.25 to 1.77) 2.53 (1.82 to 3.54) –0.40 (–0.52 to –0.28) –3.34 (–5.12 to –1.56]/ 0.61 (0.48 to 0.77) 1.25 (0.87 to 1.81) 0.86 (0.42 to 1.76) (established RA) NNT 4.5 (3.3 to 7.7) NNT 4.0 (3.0 to 5.9) 1 year Infliximab + MTX 1.17 (1.02 to 1.34) 1.57 (1.20 to 2.05) –0.17 (–0.29 to –0.06) –3.28 (–4.55 to –2.01]/ 0.87 (0.64 to 1.19) 1.27 (0.84 to 1.92) 2.74 (1.12 to 6.70) (early RA) NNT 11.1 (5.9 to 100) NNT 8.3 (5.3 to 20.0) 1 year NNH 25 (16.7 to 100) Bold type indicates statistically significant results p < 0.05 a b c RR>1 favours anti-TNFs. Negative value favours anti-TNFs. RR
combination, which was associated with nearly a three-fold increase in withdrawal owing to adverse events (RR 2.99, 95% CI 1.49 to 6.03) and serious infections (RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.12 to 6.70). Adalimumab combined with methotrexate was associated with a slight, but significant increase in [Commercial-in-confidence information removed]. Risks of serious infection (RR [Commercial-in-confidence information removed]) and withdrawal owing to adverse events (RR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.77) were also increased, compared with methotrexate alone, but these did not reach statistical significance. No significant differences in safety outcomes were found between etanercept combined with methotrexate and methotrexate alone. More malignancy occurred in the combination group but this did not reach statistical significance. All three TNF inhibitors, when combined with methotrexate, showed a trend towards increased SAEs, but again this was not statistically significant. Additional information on effectiveness and safety This section summarises additional evidence that is not included in the meta-analyses. Information cited in this section is collated from FDA reports, published reviews and observational studies, summaries of product characteristics, and submissions from the BSR and manufacturers of TNF inhibitor to NICE. Lack of appropriate, unbiased comparison groups is a major problem for the validity of comparative results from non-RCTs. This should be borne in mind when interpreting observational data. Issues related to tuberculosis and blood monitoring were discussed in the section ‘Special precautions for use of TNF inhibitors’ (p. 9) and are not described here. Mortality Mortality data from long-term follow-up programmes for patients treated with adalimumab and etanercept were reviewed by the FDA in 2003. 146 The observed death rates in the follow-up programmes, adjusted for age and gender, were lower than would be expected among US general populations and do not indicate a higher death rate with TNF inhibitor treatments. Malignancies including lymphomas A significant increase in the incidence of lymphoma compared with the general population was noted for all three TNF inhibitors in the 2003 FDA review. 146 Controversy remains with regard to whether the observed higher incidences indicate © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2006. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42 additional risk due to TNF treatment, or whether they are in line with the increased risk of lymphoma observed in RA patients with high inflammatory activity. 147–151 In general, the incidence of other types of malignancies in TNF inhibitor-treated patients was found to be similar to, or lower than that observed in the general population 146,152,153 and other RA populations. 85,151 Congestive heart failure Adalimumab and infliximab are contraindicated in moderate to severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III or IV). Two RCTs (not included in this systematic review) that evaluated the use of etanercept in the treatment of congestive failure were terminated early owing to lack of efficacy, and data from one of these trials suggested a possible tendency towards worsening of congestive heart failure and increased all-cause mortality in patients treated with etanercept. 154,155 In another trial that evaluated the use of infliximab in congestive heart failure, no clinical benefit was observed and high-dose infliximab (10 mg kg –1 at 0, 2 and 6 weeks) was associated with an increased risk for a composite outcome that included death from any cause and hospitalisation for heart failure (hazard ratio 2.84, 95% CI 1.01 to 7.97). 156 Pulmonary fibrosis In an investigation of pulmonary fibrosis and associated death, BSRBR found that there was a two- to three-fold increase in mortality for patients with pulmonary fibrosis at baseline compared with those without it among all patients (including TNF-treated and control group) with 6 months’ follow-up data. 85 As the vast majority of the patients with pulmonary fibrosis at baseline were in the TNF-treated groups and only one death associated with pulmonary fibrosis occurred in the control group, it was not possible to conclude whether there is a potential association between TNF treatment and death associated with pulmonary fibrosis. Combination of TNF inhibitors with anakinra Results from an RCT (not included in this systematic review, see Appendix 3) by Genovese and colleagues 157 suggest that combination therapy with etanercept plus anakinra provided no treatment benefit over etanercept alone, and was associated with an increased risk of serious infections (0% for etanercept alone and 3.7–7.4% for combination therapy). The combination of TNF inhibitors and anakinra is therefore not recommended. 71
- Page 36 and 37: 20 TABLE 1 Description of included
- Page 38 and 39: 22 TABLE 2 Quality of included RCTs
- Page 40 and 41: 24 Effectiveness change in modified
- Page 42 and 43: 26 Effectiveness TABLE 4 Meta-analy
- Page 44 and 45: 28 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
- Page 46 and 47: 30 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
- Page 48 and 49: 32 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
- Page 50 and 51: 34 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
- Page 52 and 53: 36 TABLE 7 Effectiveness Quality of
- Page 54 and 55: 38 Effectiveness etanercept trials.
- Page 56 and 57: 40 Effectiveness TABLE 9 Summary of
- Page 58 and 59: 42 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
- Page 60 and 61: 44 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
- Page 62 and 63: 46 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
- Page 64 and 65: 48 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
- Page 66 and 67: 50 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
- Page 68 and 69: 52 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
- Page 70 and 71: 54 Effectiveness TABLE 11 Summary o
- Page 72 and 73: 56 TABLE 12 Description of included
- Page 74 and 75: 58 TABLE 13 Quality of included RCT
- Page 76 and 77: 60 Effectiveness per week and escal
- Page 78 and 79: 62 Effectiveness significant advant
- Page 80 and 81: 64 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
- Page 82 and 83: 66 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
- Page 84 and 85: 68 Effectiveness FIGURE 44 Malignan
- Page 89 and 90: Summary of review of existing econo
- Page 91 and 92: TABLE 20 Summary of published ICERs
- Page 93 and 94: TABLE 21 Published etanercept econo
- Page 95 and 96: TABLE 23 Published economic analyse
- Page 97 and 98: TABLE 25 Treatment sequences: adali
- Page 99 and 100: management of RA, i.e. 1st and 2nd
- Page 101 and 102: To estimate the long-term consequen
- Page 103 and 104: TABLE 32 TNF inhibitors as last act
- Page 105 and 106: TABLE 34 Basic structure of the mod
- Page 107 and 108: een quit on grounds of toxicity, ad
- Page 109 and 110: TABLE 39 Strategy set: adalimumab a
- Page 111 and 112: TABLE 43 Beta distributions for HAQ
- Page 113 and 114: TABLE 44 Early cessation of DMARDs:
- Page 115 and 116: TABLE 46 Unit costs for tests and v
- Page 117 and 118: following properties, according to
- Page 119 and 120: TABLE 52 Base case: TNF inhibitors
- Page 121 and 122: TABLE 54 Base case: TNF inhibitors
- Page 123 and 124: TABLE 59 Third TNF inhibitor follow
- Page 125 and 126: TABLE 65 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
- Page 127 and 128: TABLE 67 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
- Page 129: The substantial economic impact of
- Page 133 and 134: Summary Effectiveness: principal fi
- Page 135 and 136: inhibitors, although the incrementa
combination, which was associated with nearly a<br />
three-fold increase in withdrawal owing to adverse<br />
events (RR 2.99, 95% CI 1.49 to 6.03) and serious<br />
infections (RR 2.74, 95% CI 1.12 to 6.70).<br />
Adalimumab combined with methotrexate was<br />
associated with a slight, but significant increase in<br />
[Commercial-in-confidence information<br />
removed]. Risks <strong>of</strong> serious infection (RR<br />
[Commercial-in-confidence information<br />
removed]) and withdrawal owing to adverse events<br />
(RR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.77) were also<br />
increased, compared with methotrexate alone, but<br />
<strong>the</strong>se did not reach statistical significance. No<br />
significant differences in safety outcomes were<br />
found between etanercept combined with<br />
methotrexate and methotrexate alone. More<br />
malignancy occurred in <strong>the</strong> combination group<br />
but this did not reach statistical significance. All<br />
three TNF inhibitors, when combined with<br />
methotrexate, showed a trend towards increased<br />
SAEs, but again this was not statistically<br />
significant.<br />
Additional information on <strong>effectiveness</strong><br />
and safety<br />
This section summarises additional evidence that<br />
is not included in <strong>the</strong> meta-analyses. Information<br />
cited in this section is collated from FDA reports,<br />
published <strong>review</strong>s and observational studies,<br />
summaries <strong>of</strong> product characteristics, and<br />
submissions from <strong>the</strong> BSR and manufacturers <strong>of</strong><br />
TNF inhibitor to NICE. Lack <strong>of</strong> appropriate,<br />
unbiased comparison groups is a major problem<br />
for <strong>the</strong> validity <strong>of</strong> comparative results from<br />
non-RCTs. This should be borne in mind<br />
when interpreting observational data. Issues<br />
related to tuberculosis and blood monitoring were<br />
discussed in <strong>the</strong> section ‘Special precautions for<br />
use <strong>of</strong> TNF inhibitors’ (p. 9) and are not<br />
described here.<br />
Mortality<br />
Mortality data from long-term follow-up<br />
programmes for patients treated with <strong>adalimumab</strong><br />
and etanercept were <strong>review</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> FDA in<br />
2003. 146 The observed death rates in <strong>the</strong> follow-up<br />
programmes, adjusted for age and gender, were<br />
lower than would be expected among US general<br />
populations and do not indicate a higher death<br />
rate with TNF inhibitor treatments.<br />
Malignancies including lymphomas<br />
A significant increase in <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
lymphoma compared with <strong>the</strong> general population<br />
was noted for all three TNF inhibitors in <strong>the</strong> 2003<br />
FDA <strong>review</strong>. 146 Controversy remains with regard to<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> observed higher incidences indicate<br />
© Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved.<br />
Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42<br />
additional risk due to TNF treatment, or whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are in line with <strong>the</strong> increased risk <strong>of</strong><br />
lymphoma observed in RA patients with high<br />
inflammatory activity. 147–151 In general, <strong>the</strong><br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> malignancies in TNF<br />
inhibitor-treated patients was found to be similar<br />
to, or lower than that observed in <strong>the</strong> general<br />
population 146,152,153 and o<strong>the</strong>r RA<br />
populations. 85,151<br />
Congestive heart failure<br />
Adalimumab and infliximab are contraindicated in<br />
moderate to severe heart failure (New York Heart<br />
Association class III or IV). Two RCTs (not<br />
included in this <strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong>) that evaluated<br />
<strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> etanercept in <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
congestive failure were terminated early owing to<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> efficacy, and data from one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se trials<br />
suggested a possible tendency towards worsening<br />
<strong>of</strong> congestive heart failure and increased all-cause<br />
mortality in patients treated with etanercept. 154,155<br />
In ano<strong>the</strong>r trial that evaluated <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
infliximab in congestive heart failure, no clinical<br />
benefit was observed and high-dose infliximab<br />
(10 mg kg –1 at 0, 2 and 6 weeks) was associated<br />
with an increased risk for a composite outcome<br />
that included death from any cause and<br />
hospitalisation for heart failure (hazard ratio 2.84,<br />
95% CI 1.01 to 7.97). 156<br />
Pulmonary fibrosis<br />
In an investigation <strong>of</strong> pulmonary fibrosis and<br />
associated death, BSRBR found that <strong>the</strong>re was a<br />
two- to three-fold increase in mortality for patients<br />
with pulmonary fibrosis at baseline compared with<br />
those without it among all patients (including<br />
TNF-treated and control group) with 6 months’<br />
follow-up data. 85 As <strong>the</strong> vast majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
patients with pulmonary fibrosis at baseline were<br />
in <strong>the</strong> TNF-treated groups and only one death<br />
associated with pulmonary fibrosis occurred in <strong>the</strong><br />
control group, it was not possible to conclude<br />
whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is a potential association between<br />
TNF treatment and death associated with<br />
pulmonary fibrosis.<br />
Combination <strong>of</strong> TNF inhibitors with anakinra<br />
Results from an RCT (not included in this<br />
<strong>systematic</strong> <strong>review</strong>, see Appendix 3) by Genovese<br />
and colleagues 157 suggest that combination<br />
<strong>the</strong>rapy with etanercept plus anakinra provided no<br />
treatment benefit over etanercept alone, and was<br />
associated with an increased risk <strong>of</strong> serious<br />
infections (0% for etanercept alone and 3.7–7.4%<br />
for combination <strong>the</strong>rapy). The combination <strong>of</strong><br />
TNF inhibitors and anakinra is <strong>the</strong>refore not<br />
recommended.<br />
71