A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

218 Appendix 10 TABLE 152 Variation 15: TNF inhibitors third (late RA values) (40,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 46,642 154 5.6138 0.0232 Etan 59,704 188 6.3308 0.0246 Adal+MTX 46,901 155 5.9263 0.0232 Etan+MTX 60,076 189 6.3199 0.0249 Infl+MTX 46,267 148 5.6352 0.0233 Base 16,492 36 5.4140 0.0217 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 30,151 151 0.1998 0.0223 Etan – Base 43,213 182 0.9169 0.0237 Ad+M – Base 30,409 151 0.5123 0.0226 Et+M – Base 43,584 183 0.9059 0.0240 In+M – Base 29,775 145 0.2212 0.0225 Ad+M – Adal 259 206 0.3125 0.0228 Et+M – Etan 372 244 –0.0110 0.0253 Etan – Adal 13,062 226 0.7171 0.0237 Et+M – Ad+M 13,175 228 0.3936 0.0242 Ad+M – In+M 634 201 0.2911 0.0230 Et+M – In+M 13,809 223 0.6847 0.0242 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 151,000 123,000 to 194,000 Etan – Base 47,100 44,800 to 49,700 Ad+M – Base 59,400 54,500 to 65,200 Et+M – Base 48,100 45,700 to 50,800 In+M – Base 135,000 112,000 to 169,000 Ad+M – Adal Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 18,200 17,000 to 19,700 Et+M – Ad+M 33,500 29,700 to 38,400 Ad+M – In+M 2,180 758 to 3,600 Et+M – In+M 20,200 18,700 to 21,900 TABLE 153 Variation 15: TNF inhibitors last (40,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 35,348 154 1.8651 0.0157 Etan 48,690 186 2.9900 0.0189 Adal+MTX 35,388 154 2.1386 0.0159 Etan+MTX 49,012 187 2.9827 0.0193 Infl+MTX 35,511 149 1.9051 0.0160 Base 2,865 8 1.0327 0.0130 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 32,482 153 0.8324 0.0115 Etan – Base 45,825 184 1.9573 0.0161 Ad+M – Base 32,523 152 1.1058 0.0122 Et+M – Base 46,147 185 1.9500 0.0167 In+M – Base 32,646 147 0.8724 0.0120 Ad+M – Adal 41 211 0.2734 0.0147 Et+M – Etan 322 247 –0.0073 0.0212 Etan – Adal 13,342 230 1.1249 0.0179 Et+M – Ad+M 13,624 232 0.8442 0.0189 In+M – Ad+M 123 207 –0.2334 0.0151 Et+M – In+M 13,501 227 1.0776 0.0187 continued
TABLE 153 Variation 15: TNF inhibitors last (40,000 patients) (cont’d) © Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 39,000 37,900 to 40,200 Etan – Base 23,400 23,000 to 23,800 Ad+M – Base 29,400 28,700 to 30,100 Et+M – Base 23,700 23,200 to 24,100 In+M – Base 37,400 36,400 to 38,500 Ad+M – Adal Adal+MTX more effective than Adal alone; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive Etan – Adal 11,900 11,300 to 12,400 Et+M – Ad+M 16,100 15,300 to 17,100 In+M – Ad+M Adal+MTX more effective than Infl+MTX; diff. cost not significant Et+M – In+M 12,500 12,000 to 13,200 Variation 16 In this variation, short-term quitters on conventional DMARDs were reduced by 50%. TABLE 154 Variation 16: TNF inhibitors first (200,000 patients) Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE Adal 49,314 72 8.9243 0.0119 Etan 63,789 88 9.2683 0.0124 Adal+MTX 49,359 73 8.5292 0.0113 Etan+MTX 63,870 89 8.9366 0.0120 Infl+MTX 48,774 70 8.3809 0.0114 Base 15,059 15 8.2830 0.0112 Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE Adal – Base 34,255 71 0.6412 0.0119 Etan – Base 48,730 85 0.9853 0.0122 Ad+M – Base 34,300 72 0.2461 0.0116 Et+M – Base 48,811 86 0.6535 0.0121 In+M – Base 33,715 69 0.0978 0.0116 Ad+M – Adal 46 98 –0.3951 0.0120 Et+M – Etan 81 117 –0.3317 0.0126 Etan – Adal 14,475 107 0.3441 0.0124 Et+M – Ad+M 14,511 109 0.4074 0.0121 Ad+M – In+M 585 97 0.1483 0.0117 Et+M – In+M 15,096 107 0.5557 0.0121 Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI Adal – Base 53,400 51,500 to 55,500 Etan – Base 49,500 48,200 to 50,700 Ad+M – Base 139,000 127,000 to 154,000 Et+M – Base 74,700 72,000 to 77,600 In+M – Base 345,000 278,000 to 452,000 Ad+M – Adal Adal alone more effective than Adal+MTX; diff. cost not significant Et+M – Etan Etan alone more effective than Etan+MTX; diff. cost not significant Etan – Adal 42,100 39,200 to 45,400 Et+M – Ad+M 35,600 33,600 to 37,900 Ad+M – In+M 3,940 2,500 to 5,390 Et+M – In+M 27,200 26,000 to 28,500 219
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 3 and 4:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 5 and 6:
Objectives: This report reviews the
Page 7:
Glossary and list of abbreviations
Page 10 and 11:
viii Glossary and list of abbreviat
Page 13 and 14:
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA
Page 15:
increased risk of serious infection
Page 19 and 20:
Summary RA is a common, chronic, in
Page 21 and 22:
(IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), pr
Page 23 and 24:
Assessment of response to DMARDs Re
Page 25 and 26:
combination with methotrexate or al
Page 27:
disease between clinic appointments
Page 30 and 31:
14 Effectiveness in juvenile arthri
Page 32 and 33:
16 Effectiveness adalimumab plus me
Page 34 and 35:
18 Effectiveness Monoclonal Antibod
Page 36 and 37:
20 TABLE 1 Description of included
Page 38 and 39:
22 TABLE 2 Quality of included RCTs
Page 40 and 41:
24 Effectiveness change in modified
Page 42 and 43:
26 Effectiveness TABLE 4 Meta-analy
Page 44 and 45:
28 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 46 and 47:
30 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 48 and 49:
32 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 50 and 51:
34 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 52 and 53:
36 TABLE 7 Effectiveness Quality of
Page 54 and 55:
38 Effectiveness etanercept trials.
Page 56 and 57:
40 Effectiveness TABLE 9 Summary of
Page 58 and 59:
42 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
54 Effectiveness TABLE 11 Summary o
Page 72 and 73:
56 TABLE 12 Description of included
Page 74 and 75:
58 TABLE 13 Quality of included RCT
Page 76 and 77:
60 Effectiveness per week and escal
Page 78 and 79:
62 Effectiveness significant advant
Page 80 and 81:
64 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 82 and 83:
66 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 84 and 85:
68 Effectiveness FIGURE 44 Malignan
Page 86 and 87:
70 TABLE 17 Effectiveness Summary o
Page 89 and 90:
Summary of review of existing econo
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE 20 Summary of published ICERs
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE 21 Published etanercept econo
Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 23 Published economic analyse
Page 97 and 98:
TABLE 25 Treatment sequences: adali
Page 99 and 100:
management of RA, i.e. 1st and 2nd
Page 101 and 102:
To estimate the long-term consequen
Page 103 and 104:
TABLE 32 TNF inhibitors as last act
Page 105 and 106:
TABLE 34 Basic structure of the mod
Page 107 and 108:
een quit on grounds of toxicity, ad
Page 109 and 110:
TABLE 39 Strategy set: adalimumab a
Page 111 and 112:
TABLE 43 Beta distributions for HAQ
Page 113 and 114:
TABLE 44 Early cessation of DMARDs:
Page 115 and 116:
TABLE 46 Unit costs for tests and v
Page 117 and 118:
following properties, according to
Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 52 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 121 and 122:
TABLE 54 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 123 and 124:
TABLE 59 Third TNF inhibitor follow
Page 125 and 126:
TABLE 65 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 127 and 128:
TABLE 67 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 129:
The substantial economic impact of
Page 133 and 134:
Summary Effectiveness: principal fi
Page 135 and 136:
inhibitors, although the incrementa
Page 137 and 138:
introduce bias which generally exag
Page 139:
Adalimumab, etanercept and inflixim
Page 143 and 144:
1. Jobanputra P, Barton P, Bryan S,
Page 145 and 146:
46. Young A, Dixey J, Cox N, Davies
Page 147 and 148:
tumor necrosis factor therapy in th
Page 149 and 150:
arthritis: a 12-week, double-blind,
Page 151 and 152:
171. Geborek P, Crnkic M, Petersson
Page 153 and 154:
216. Schotte H, Willeke P, Mickholz
Page 155 and 156:
The Health Assessment Questionnaire
Page 157 and 158:
Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) 2005 Iss
Page 159 and 160:
Appendix 3 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 161:
TABLE 69 Studies excluded from clin
Page 164 and 165:
148 Appendix 4 TABLE 71 Meta-analys
Page 166 and 167:
150 Appendix 4 TABLE 73 Meta-analys
Page 168 and 169:
152 Appendix 4 Infliximab versus pl
Page 170 and 171:
154 Appendix 4 Infliximab plus MTX
Page 173:
Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1966 to February we
Page 177 and 178:
Appendix 8 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 179 and 180:
TABLE 79 Wong et al., 2002 161 © Q
Page 181 and 182:
TABLE 80 Kobelt et al., 2003 162 (c
Page 183 and 184: TABLE 82 Brennan et al., 2004 160
Page 185 and 186: TABLE 83 Kobelt et al., 2004 163 (c
Page 187 and 188: TABLE 85 Bansback et al., 2005 166
Page 189: TABLE 86 Kobelt et al., 2005 167 (c
Page 192 and 193: 176 Appendix 9 TABLE 89 Strategy se
Page 195 and 196: Extensive sensitivity analysis was
Page 197 and 198: TABLE 96 Variation 1: TNF inhibitor
Page 199 and 200: TABLE 99 Variation 2: TNF inhibitor
Page 201 and 202: TABLE 102 Variation 3: TNF inhibito
Page 221 and 222: TABLE 132 Variation 10: TNF inhibit
Page 233: TABLE 150 Variation 15: TNF inhibit
Page 243: TABLE 165 Variation 18: TNF inhibit
Page 247 and 248: Volume 1, 1997 No. 1 Home parentera
Page 249 and 250: No. 3 Screening for sickle cell dis
Page 251 and 252: No. 25 A rapid and systematic revie
Page 253 and 254: No. 11 First and second trimester a
Page 255 and 256: No. 23 Clinical effectiveness and c
Page 257 and 258: No. 28 Outcomes of electrically sti
Page 259: No. 28 Adefovir dipivoxil and pegyl
Page 262 and 263: 246 Health Technology Assessment Pr
Page 264: 248 Health Technology Assessment Pr
show all

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?