12.08.2013 Views

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TABLE 117 Variation 6: TNF inhibitors last (40,000 patients) (cont’d)<br />

© Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved.<br />

Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42<br />

Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI<br />

Adal – Base 37,500 36,500 to 38,600<br />

Etan – Base 23,000 22,600 to 23,400<br />

Ad+M – Base 29,500 28,800 to 30,200<br />

Et+M – Base 23,100 22,600 to 23,500<br />

In+M – Base 34,900 33,900 to 35,900<br />

Ad+M – Adal 5,420 3,870 to 6,970<br />

Et+M – Etan Comparison is inconclusive<br />

Etan – Adal 12,200 11,700 to 12,800<br />

Et+M – Ad+M 14,500 13,600 to 15,400<br />

Ad+M – In+M 5,560 3,470 to 7,640<br />

Et+M – In+M 12,700 12,100 to 13,300<br />

Variation 7<br />

In this variation, <strong>the</strong> <strong>effectiveness</strong> <strong>of</strong> conventional DMARDs was reduced by 50%. This was done by<br />

reducing <strong>the</strong> a parameter for HAQ multiplier by 50%, keeping <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> a + b fixed. For example, for<br />

leflunomide a = 0.57 and b = 0.65. This was changed to a = 0.285 and b = 0.935.<br />

TABLE 118 Variation 7: TNF inhibitors first (40,000 patients)<br />

Option Cost (£) QSE QALYs QSE<br />

Adal 49,297 161 7.5581 0.0248<br />

Etan 63,619 196 8.1659 0.0264<br />

Adal+MTX 49,206 162 7.4410 0.0242<br />

Etan+MTX 64,015 198 8.0980 0.0259<br />

Infl+MTX 49,286 156 7.3395 0.0242<br />

Base 15,139 34 6.5733 0.0234<br />

Comparison Diff. cost (£) QSE Diff. QALY QSE<br />

Adal – Base 34,158 158 0.9848 0.0234<br />

Etan – Base 48,480 192 1.5926 0.0248<br />

Ad+M – Base 34,067 160 0.8677 0.0230<br />

Et+M – Base 48,875 193 1.5247 0.0248<br />

In+M – Base 34,147 154 0.7662 0.0229<br />

Adal – Ad+M 92 220 0.1171 0.0242<br />

Et+M – Etan 395 261 –0.0679 0.0269<br />

Etan – Adal 14,322 241 0.6078 0.0257<br />

Et+M – Ad+M 14,809 244 0.6570 0.0255<br />

In+M – Ad+M 80 216 –0.1015 0.0240<br />

Et+M – In+M 14,729 241 0.7585 0.0255<br />

Comparison ICER (£ per QALY) Quasi-CI<br />

Adal – Base 34,700 33,100 to 36,400<br />

Etan – Base 30,400 29,500 to 31,500<br />

Ad+M – Base 39,300 37,300 to 41,500<br />

Et+M – Base 32,100 31,000 to 33,200<br />

In+M – Base 44,600 42,000 to 47,400<br />

Adal – Ad+M Adal alone more effective than Adal+MTX; diff. cost not significant<br />

Et+M – Etan Etan alone more effective than Etan +MTX; diff. cost not significant<br />

Etan – Adal 23,600 21,600 to 25,900<br />

Et+M – Ad+M 22,500 20,800 to 24,600<br />

In+M – Ad+M Adal+MTX more effective than Infl+MTX; diff. cost not significant<br />

Et+M – In+M 19,400 18,100 to 21,000<br />

195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!