A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

164 Appendix 8 TABLE 80 Kobelt et al., 2003 162 Authors Kobelt, Jonsson, Young, Eberhardt Date 2003 Type of economic evaluation Cost–utility analysis Country of origin France, Sweden, UK Currency used Euros, Swedish Kronor, pounds sterling Year to which costs apply Not stated Perspective Societal Study population Patients with RA not responding to at least two DMARDs (including MTX) Intervention 1 Infliximab + MTX Intervention 2 MTX alone Source of effectiveness data Clinical data from two RA cohorts, followed for up to 15 years, in Sweden and the UK (ERAS), in which average HAQ scores were calculated and used to inform the effectiveness data and the transition probabilities within the model Cost data handled Direct costs included hospitalisation, surgical interventions, ambulatory and community care appropriately and RA medication. Non-medical direct costs and informal care costs were excluded. The cost of hospitalisation was based on the number of inpatient days in different wards and ward-specific costs; the cost of surgical interventions was based on the type of intervention and its duration multiplied by the cost per minute of operating theatre use. Outpatient costs were based on the number of visits to different healthcare professionals. The cost of RA drugs was calculated from the number of months of use and the cost associated with standard drug monitoring protocols in place in the rheumatology departments of participating study centres. Unit cost data were taken from hospital accounting data and official price lists. Indirect costs were calculated as the loss of work capacity of patients in the more advanced disease states. For patients in disease state 1 (i.e. HAQ < 0.6) only shortterm sick leave was considered. The human capital approach was used, in which an individual’s productivity is valued at market price. The total number of productive years lost at each stage (of the model) was compared with the number in state 1, and the difference multiplied by the average gross annual income. The cost of infliximab was calculated using the official list price and the doses prescribed in clinical practice (in Sweden and in the UK, respectively) Modelling summary Markov model with a cycle length of 1 year (in line with the annual follow-up of epidemiological studies). A time-horizon of 10 years was used Outcome measures used in Incremental QALYs (based on EQ-5D) and ICERs economic evaluations Direction of result with NE quadrant. For 1 year of treatment, €3440 per QALY in Sweden and €34,800 per QALY appropriate quadrant location in the UK. The only exception is with the ‘alternative model’ comparing total costs at 1 year (unadjusted) and total costs at 1 year (adjusted for the effect loss at discontinuation) for Sweden. The direction of results in these two cases is the SE quadrant (cost saving) Statistical analysis for Not undertaken patient-level stochastic data Appropriateness of statistical NA analysis Uncertainty around Not undertaken cost-effectiveness expressed Appropriateness of method NA dealing with uncertainty around cost effectiveness Sensitivity analysis A sensitivity analysis was undertaken by way of an ‘alternative model’, in which a loss of treatment effect was assumed in the year after discontinuation, expressed as a faster disease progression than that reported in the cohorts. Differences in HAQ scores between infliximab and MTX groups in the clinical trials were applied to the cohorts for the treatment arm for the first year. Thus, treatment was compared directly with that of the cohorts. A sensitivity analysis was also undertaken on the price of infliximab continued
TABLE 80 Kobelt et al., 2003 162 (cont’d) © Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2006. All rights reserved. Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42 Modelling inputs and Yes techniques appropriate Authors’ conclusions 1 or 2 years of treatment with infliximab reduced direct and indirect resource consumption in Sweden and the UK, thereby partly offsetting the treatment costs. In the base-case analysis, including direct and indirect costs, the cost per QALY gained was SEK32,000 in Sweden (€3440) and £21,600 in the UK (€34,800) for 1 year of treatment. The respective QALY gains were 0.248 and 0.298. With 2 years of treatment, the cost per QALY gained was SEK150,000 in Sweden (€16,100) and £29,900 in the UK (€48,200). The results suggest that 1–2 years of treatment with infliximab and MTX, compared with MTX alone, will lead to savings in both direct and indirect costs. Savings in direct costs are €1500–2000 in Sweden and up to 800 in the UK. These savings will not offset the cost of infliximab. The majority of savings will come from maintaining the patients’ ability to work. However, when only direct costs are included, the cost-effectiveness ratios remain within the usual range for treatments to be recommended for use TABLE 81 Welsing et al., 2004 165 Authors Welsing, Severens, Hartman, van Riel, Laan Date 2004 Type of economic evaluation Cost–utility analysis Country of origin Netherlands Currency used Euros Year to which costs apply Not stated Perspective Societal Study population Patients with RA who satisfy the indication for TNF inhibitors in the Netherlands Intervention 1 Usual treatment Intervention 2 Treatment with leflunomide, in the case of non-response after 3 months switch to usual treatment Intervention 3 Treatment with etanercept, in the case of non-response after 3 months switch to usual treatment Intervention 4 Treatment with leflunomide, in the case of non-response after 3 months switch to etanercept, in the case of non-response switch to TNF-blocking agent, switch to usual treatment Intervention 5 Treatment with etanercept, in the case of non-response after 3 months switch to leflunomide, in the case of non-response switch to leflunomide switch to usual treatment Source of effectiveness data The following sources of effectiveness data were used: 1. QoL data from a 48-week multicentre trial involving 411 patients were assigned to the health states within the Markov model 2. Follow-up data of patients from an open longitudinal study of early RA (disease duration
Page 1 and 2:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 3 and 4:
A systematic review of the effectiv
Page 5 and 6:
Objectives: This report reviews the
Page 7:
Glossary and list of abbreviations
Page 10 and 11:
viii Glossary and list of abbreviat
Page 13 and 14:
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA
Page 15:
increased risk of serious infection
Page 19 and 20:
Summary RA is a common, chronic, in
Page 21 and 22:
(IL-2) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), pr
Page 23 and 24:
Assessment of response to DMARDs Re
Page 25 and 26:
combination with methotrexate or al
Page 27:
disease between clinic appointments
Page 30 and 31:
14 Effectiveness in juvenile arthri
Page 32 and 33:
16 Effectiveness adalimumab plus me
Page 34 and 35:
18 Effectiveness Monoclonal Antibod
Page 36 and 37:
20 TABLE 1 Description of included
Page 38 and 39:
22 TABLE 2 Quality of included RCTs
Page 40 and 41:
24 Effectiveness change in modified
Page 42 and 43:
26 Effectiveness TABLE 4 Meta-analy
Page 44 and 45:
28 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 46 and 47:
30 Effectiveness Review: Adalimumab
Page 48 and 49:
32 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 50 and 51:
34 TABLE 6 Effectiveness Descriptio
Page 52 and 53:
36 TABLE 7 Effectiveness Quality of
Page 54 and 55:
38 Effectiveness etanercept trials.
Page 56 and 57:
40 Effectiveness TABLE 9 Summary of
Page 58 and 59:
42 Effectiveness Review: Etanercept
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
54 Effectiveness TABLE 11 Summary o
Page 72 and 73:
56 TABLE 12 Description of included
Page 74 and 75:
58 TABLE 13 Quality of included RCT
Page 76 and 77:
60 Effectiveness per week and escal
Page 78 and 79:
62 Effectiveness significant advant
Page 80 and 81:
64 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 82 and 83:
66 Effectiveness Review: Infliximab
Page 84 and 85:
68 Effectiveness FIGURE 44 Malignan
Page 86 and 87:
70 TABLE 17 Effectiveness Summary o
Page 89 and 90:
Summary of review of existing econo
Page 91 and 92:
TABLE 20 Summary of published ICERs
Page 93 and 94:
TABLE 21 Published etanercept econo
Page 95 and 96:
TABLE 23 Published economic analyse
Page 97 and 98:
TABLE 25 Treatment sequences: adali
Page 99 and 100:
management of RA, i.e. 1st and 2nd
Page 101 and 102:
To estimate the long-term consequen
Page 103 and 104:
TABLE 32 TNF inhibitors as last act
Page 105 and 106:
TABLE 34 Basic structure of the mod
Page 107 and 108:
een quit on grounds of toxicity, ad
Page 109 and 110:
TABLE 39 Strategy set: adalimumab a
Page 111 and 112:
TABLE 43 Beta distributions for HAQ
Page 113 and 114:
TABLE 44 Early cessation of DMARDs:
Page 115 and 116:
TABLE 46 Unit costs for tests and v
Page 117 and 118:
following properties, according to
Page 119 and 120:
TABLE 52 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 121 and 122:
TABLE 54 Base case: TNF inhibitors
Page 123 and 124:
TABLE 59 Third TNF inhibitor follow
Page 125 and 126:
TABLE 65 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 127 and 128:
TABLE 67 Sensitivity analyses: TNF
Page 129: The substantial economic impact of
Page 133 and 134: Summary Effectiveness: principal fi
Page 135 and 136: inhibitors, although the incrementa
Page 137 and 138: introduce bias which generally exag
Page 139: Adalimumab, etanercept and inflixim
Page 143 and 144: 1. Jobanputra P, Barton P, Bryan S,
Page 145 and 146: 46. Young A, Dixey J, Cox N, Davies
Page 147 and 148: tumor necrosis factor therapy in th
Page 149 and 150: arthritis: a 12-week, double-blind,
Page 151 and 152: 171. Geborek P, Crnkic M, Petersson
Page 153 and 154: 216. Schotte H, Willeke P, Mickholz
Page 155 and 156: The Health Assessment Questionnaire
Page 157 and 158: Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) 2005 Iss
Page 159 and 160: Appendix 3 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 161: TABLE 69 Studies excluded from clin
Page 164 and 165: 148 Appendix 4 TABLE 71 Meta-analys
Page 166 and 167: 150 Appendix 4 TABLE 73 Meta-analys
Page 168 and 169: 152 Appendix 4 Infliximab versus pl
Page 170 and 171: 154 Appendix 4 Infliximab plus MTX
Page 173: Ovid MEDLINE(R) 1966 to February we
Page 177 and 178: Appendix 8 © Queen’s Printer and
Page 179: TABLE 79 Wong et al., 2002 161 © Q
Page 183 and 184: TABLE 82 Brennan et al., 2004 160
Page 185 and 186: TABLE 83 Kobelt et al., 2004 163 (c
Page 187 and 188: TABLE 85 Bansback et al., 2005 166
Page 189: TABLE 86 Kobelt et al., 2005 167 (c
Page 192 and 193: 176 Appendix 9 TABLE 89 Strategy se
Page 195 and 196: Extensive sensitivity analysis was
Page 197 and 198: TABLE 96 Variation 1: TNF inhibitor
Page 199 and 200: TABLE 99 Variation 2: TNF inhibitor
Page 201 and 202: TABLE 102 Variation 3: TNF inhibito
Page 221 and 222: TABLE 132 Variation 10: TNF inhibit
Page 231 and 232:
TABLE 147 Variation 14: TNF inhibit
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243:
Page 247 and 248:
Volume 1, 1997 No. 1 Home parentera
Page 249 and 250:
No. 3 Screening for sickle cell dis
Page 251 and 252:
No. 25 A rapid and systematic revie
Page 253 and 254:
No. 11 First and second trimester a
Page 255 and 256:
No. 23 Clinical effectiveness and c
Page 257 and 258:
No. 28 Outcomes of electrically sti
Page 259:
No. 28 Adefovir dipivoxil and pegyl
Page 262 and 263:
246 Health Technology Assessment Pr
Page 264:
248 Health Technology Assessment Pr
show all

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?