12.08.2013 Views

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Appendix 8<br />

© Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2006. All rights reserved.<br />

Health Technology Assessment 2006; Vol. 10: No. 42<br />

Existing economic evaluations: appraisal and<br />

data extraction<br />

TABLE 78 Choi et al., 2002 159<br />

Authors Choi, Seeger, Kuntz<br />

Date 2002<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> economic evaluation Cost-<strong>effectiveness</strong> analysis<br />

Country <strong>of</strong> origin USA<br />

Currency used US dollars<br />

Year to which costs apply 1999<br />

Perspective Societal<br />

Study population Patients with MTX-naïve RA<br />

Intervention 1 Etanercept<br />

Intervention 2 LEF<br />

Intervention 3 MTX (up to 15 mg weekly)<br />

Intervention 4 SSZ<br />

Intervention 5 No second line agent<br />

Source <strong>of</strong> <strong>effectiveness</strong> data Clinical trial data used: ACR20 response criteria and a weighted outcome measure <strong>of</strong> ACR<br />

responses relative to a full weight <strong>of</strong> ACR70 responses (ACR70 response: ACR70 WR) by<br />

calculating a weighted average <strong>of</strong> proportions achieving ACR70, ACR50 and ACR20. A<br />

weight <strong>of</strong> 1 was assigned to ACR70, a weight <strong>of</strong> 50/70 to ACR50 and a weight <strong>of</strong> 20/70 to<br />

ACR20<br />

Cost data handled Yes. Direct and indirect costs were considered. Medication costs were averaged wholesale<br />

appropriately prices and monitoring costs were based on published estimates where available. If<br />

unavailable, costs were derived from <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> components recommended by ACR for<br />

each DMARD which were summed, or by monitoring guidelines in <strong>the</strong> package insert <strong>of</strong><br />

leflunomide<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> no second-line treatment was calculated by subtracting ophthalmological<br />

monitoring cost (once over <strong>the</strong> 6-month period) from <strong>the</strong> monitoring cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> least<br />

expensive DMARD costs. Monitoring costs <strong>of</strong> etanercept were assumed to be <strong>the</strong> same as<br />

<strong>the</strong> monitoring costs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> no second-line treatment. Toxicity cost associated with MTX<br />

<strong>the</strong>rapy was estimated to be $259 (1999 prices). Toxicity cost <strong>of</strong> SSZ was assumed to be <strong>the</strong><br />

same as MTX. It was assumed that <strong>the</strong>re were no toxicity costs for leflunomide or<br />

etanercept<br />

Inpatient surgical costs were included to capture potential savings associated with<br />

improvement <strong>of</strong> RA from each option. An exponential relationship between HAQ score and<br />

inpatient surgery costs for each treatment strategy was developed. Medical admission costs<br />

were assumed to be largely due to toxicity <strong>of</strong> DMARDs<br />

Indirect costs were included to capture <strong>the</strong> potential savings associated with improvement <strong>of</strong><br />

RA for each treatment. An HAQ indirect cost assignment was used, using <strong>the</strong> same HAQ<br />

efficacy estimates used for <strong>the</strong> surgical costs. A linear relationship was assumed to exist<br />

between work capacity and HAQ score to infer indirect cost savings associated with HAQ<br />

improvement. This was based on a published cost-<strong>effectiveness</strong> analysis in a Swedish RA<br />

population. The average wage was multiplied by work capacity achieved in each option to<br />

estimate <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> lost work capacity<br />

Modelling summary A decision-analytic model was constructed and analysed using Data s<strong>of</strong>tware (version 3.5;<br />

TreeAge S<strong>of</strong>tware, Williamstown, MA, USA). The decision tree with a time-horizon <strong>of</strong><br />

6 months was used in <strong>the</strong> model (this was considered to represent <strong>the</strong> usual duration <strong>of</strong><br />

clinical trials <strong>of</strong> RA)<br />

continued<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!