12.08.2013 Views

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

96<br />

Health economics<br />

p remaining<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

Weeks on treatment<br />

FIGURE 48 Illustrative curve for survival time on a treatment (based on leflunomide data)<br />

TABLE 44 Early cessation <strong>of</strong> DMARDs: data, sources and comments<br />

Drug Cessation at Ceasing between Comments and source<br />

≤ 6 weeks a 6 and 24 weeks<br />

Adal (with or 5% 10% (5% because <strong>of</strong> No appropriate data found; assume same as infliximab<br />

without MTX) toxicity and 4% for<br />

inefficacy, 1% for o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reasons)<br />

AZA 15% 25% Data estimated from Willkens. 181 Reasons for cessation<br />

due to toxicity, inefficacy or o<strong>the</strong>r reasons are not available<br />

CyA 8% 24% (12% because <strong>of</strong> Data estimated from Yocum182 It is assumed that half<br />

inefficacy and 12% <strong>of</strong> those ceasing between 6 and 24 weeks do so because<br />

for toxicity) <strong>of</strong> inefficacy and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r half because <strong>of</strong> toxicity; based<br />

on observations by Marra. 183<br />

Etan (with or 4% 3% (1% because <strong>of</strong> Observational study by Geborek 2002 171 (see leflunomide).<br />

without MTX) toxicity and 2% for<br />

inefficacy)<br />

84% <strong>of</strong> all patients remained on treatment at 12 months<br />

GST 14% 27% (18% because <strong>of</strong> Figures estimated from Hamilton. 184 Estimated figures<br />

toxicity and 9% for from Zeidler 175 are 10% within 6 weeks and 34% at<br />

inefficacy) 24 weeks<br />

HCQ 3% 18% (4% because <strong>of</strong> Data estimated from Furst185 using a cohort treated with<br />

toxicity and 14% for 800 mg per day as this group provided <strong>the</strong> most complete<br />

inefficacy) data set<br />

Infl + MTX 5% 10% (5% because <strong>of</strong> Observational study by Geborek 171 (see leflunomide).<br />

toxicity and 4% for<br />

inefficacy, 1% for<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r reasons)<br />

75% <strong>of</strong> all patients remained on treatment at 12 months<br />

LEF 10% for drug 30% (10% because <strong>of</strong> Data estimated from Geborek. 171 These data are preferred<br />

toxicity and toxicity, 19% for to trial data because clinical experience indicates that<br />

3% for o<strong>the</strong>r inefficacy and 1% for continued drug use is less likely in practice than use in<br />

reasons o<strong>the</strong>r reasons) randomised trials. 186<br />

MTX 8.5% 19.5% (8.5% because Estimates from Hamilton 184<br />

<strong>of</strong> toxicity and 11% for<br />

inefficacy)<br />

continued

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!