Pay for Quality

More documents

Recommendations

Info

166 Pay for Quality KCE Reports 118 22. Formulier II voor het beoordelen van een randomised controlled trial (RCT). Dutch Conchrane Collaboration Centre; 2008. 23. Formulier III voor het beoordelen van een cohortonderzoek. Dutch Cochrane Collaboration Centre 2008. 24. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;148(4):295-309. 25. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. British Medical Journal. 2004;328(7441):702-8. 26. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, et al. Evaluating nonrandomised intervention studies. Health Technol.Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-173. 27. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1998;52(6):377-84. 28. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.0. updated February 2008. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2008. 29. Sanderson S, Tatt LD, Higgins JPT. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2007;36(3):666-76. 30. Van de Voorde C, L‚onard C. Search for evidence and critical appraisal: health services research (HSR). Brussels Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2007. 31. Cleemput I, Van Wilder P, Vrijens F, Huybrechts M, Ramaekers D. Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations in Belgium. Health Technology assessment (HTA). Bruxelles: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2008. KCE Reports 78C (D/2008/10.273/27) 32. Weinstein MC, O'Brien B, Hornberger J, Jackson J, Johannesson M, McCabe C, et al. Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health-care evaluation: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies. Value Health. 2003;6(1):9-17. 33. van der Knaap L, Leeuw F, Bogaerts S, Nijssen L. Combining Campbell Standards and the Realist Evaluation Approach. American Journal of Evaluation. 2008;29(1):48-57. 34. Chien AT, Conti RM, Pollack HA. A pediatric-focused review of the performance incentive literature. Curr.Opin.Pediatr. 2007;19(6):719-25. 35. Conrad DA, Christianson JB. Penetrating the "black box": financial incentives for enhancing the quality of physician services. Med.Care Res.Rev. 2004;61(3 Suppl):37S-68S. 36. Dudley RA, Miller RH, Korenbrot TY, Luft HS. The impact of financial incentives on quality of health care. Milbank Quarterly. 1998;76(4):649-+. 37. Dudley RA, Frolich A, Robinowitz DL, Talavera JA, Broadhead P, Luft HS. Strategies to support quality-based purchasing: A review of the evidence. Rockville, MD: Prepared by the Stanford- University of California San Francisco Evidence-based Practice Center; 2004. 38. Frolich A, Talavera JA, Broadhead P, Dudley RA. A behavioral model of clinician responses to incentives to improve quality. Health Policy. 2007;80(1):179-93. 39. Magnus SA. Physicians' financial incentives in five dimensions: A conceptual framework for HMO managers. Health Care Management Review. 1999;24(1):57-72. 40. Town R, Kane R, Johnson P, Butler M. Economic incentives and physicians' delivery of preventive care: a systematic review. Am.J Prev.Med. 2005;28(2):234-40. 41. Town R, Wholey DR, Kralewski J, Dowd B. Assessing the influence of incentives on physicians and medical groups. Med.Care Res.Rev. 2004;61(3 Suppl):80S-118S. 42. Williams TR. Practical design and implementation considerations in pay-for-performance programs. American Journal of Managed Care. 2006;12(2):77-80. 43. Young GJ, Conrad DA. Practical issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs. Journal of Healthcare Management. 2007;52(1):10-8. 44. Lindenauer PK, Remus D, Roman S, Rothberg MB, Benjamin EM, Ma A, et al. Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement. New England Journal of Medicine. 2007;356(5):486-96. 45. Petersen LA, Woodard LD, Urech T, Daw C, Sookanan S. Does pay-for-performance improve the quality of health care? Ann.Intern.Med. 2006;145(4):265-72.
KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 167 46. Rosenthal MB, Landon BE, Normand ST, Frank RG, Epstein AM. Pay for performance in commercial HMOs. New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355(18):1895-902. 47. Bonner SE, Sprinkle GB. The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting Organizations and Society. 2002;27(4-5):303-45. 48. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin. 1999;125(6):627-68. 49. Gagne M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2005;26(4):331-62. 50. Prendergast C. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature. 1999; 37 7- 63. 51. Rynes SL, Gerhart B, Parks L. Personnel psychology: performance evaluation and pay for performance. Annu.Rev.Psychol. 2005;56:571-600. 52. Lavy V. Using performance-based pay to improve the quality of teachers. Future.Child. 2007;17(1):87-109. 53. Salber PR, Bradley BE. Adding quality to the health care purchasing equation. Health Aff.(Millwood.). 2001;Suppl Web Exclusives:W93-W5. 54. Young GJ, White B, Burgess JF, Berlowitz D, Meterko M, Guldin MR, et al. Conceptual issues in the design and implementation of pay-for-quality programs. American Journal of Medical Quality. 2005;20(3):144-50. 55. Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United kingdom. N.Engl.J.Med. 2004;351(14):1448-54. 56. Vlayen J, Van De Water G, Camberlin C, Paulus D, Leys M, Ramaekers D. Klinische kwaliteitsindicatoren. Brussel: Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE); 2006. 57. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. 2001. 58. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G. Concepts and principles for tackling inequalities in health: Levelling up Part 1. W.R.O.F. Europe. Copenhagen, World Health Organisation. 2006. 59. Aday LA, Begley CE, Lairson DR, Slater CH, Richard AJ, Montoya ID. A framework for assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, and equity of behavioral healthcare. Am.J.Manag.Care. 1999;5 Spec No:SP25-SP44. 60. Braveman P. Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement. Annu.Rev.Public Health. 2006;27:167-94. 61. Chang WC. The meaning and goals of equity in health. J.Epidemiol.Community Health. 2002;56(7):488-91. 62. Whitehead M, Dahlgren G, Evans T. Equity and health sector reforms: can low-income countries escape the medical poverty trap? Lancet. 2001;358(9284):833-6. 63. Goddard M, Smith P. Equity of access to health care services: theory and evidence from the UK. Soc.Sci.Med. 2001;53(9):1149-62. 64. Ward PR. The relevance of equity in health care for primary care: creating and sustaining a 'fair go, for a fair innings'. Qual.Prim.Care. 2009;17(1):49-54. 65. Willems S. The socio-economic gradient in health: a never-ending story? A descriptive and explorative study in Belgium: Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care. Ghent University; 2003. 66. Bradshaw J. The conceptualisation and measurement of need. In: PopayJ, G WI, editors. Researching the people's Health. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 45-57. 67. Duckett SJ. Design of price incentives for adjunct policy goals in formula funding for hospitals and health services. BMC Health Serv.Res. 2008;8:72. 68. Hackbarth G, Milgate K. Using quality incentives to drive physician adoption of health information technology. Health Affairs. 2005;24(5):1147-9. 69. Rosenthal MB, de Brantes FS, Sinaiko AD, Frankel M, Robbins RD, Young S. Recognizing High- Quality Care: Analysis of Physician Quality and Resource Use. American Journal of Managed Care. 2008;14(10):670-7.
Page 1 and 2:
Voordelen, nadelen en haalbaarheid
Page 3 and 4:
Voordelen, nadelen en haalbaarheid
Page 5 and 6:
Externe validatoren : Simpson (Univ
Page 7 and 8:
KCE Reports 118A Pay for Quality ii
Page 9 and 10:
KCE Reports 118A Pay for Quality iv
Page 11 and 12:
KCE Reports 118A Pay for Quality vi
Page 13 and 14:
KCE Reports 118A Pay for Quality vi
Page 15 and 16:
KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 1 S
Page 17 and 18:
KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 3 9
Page 19 and 20:
KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 5 W
Page 21 and 22:
KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 7 S
Page 23 and 24:
KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 9 2
Page 25 and 26:
KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 11
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Clinical domain (disease) KCE Repor
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130: KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 115
Page 179: KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 165
Page 191: KCE Reports 118 Pay for Quality 177
Page 194 and 195: Wettelijk depot : D/2008/10.273/50
Page 196 and 197: 37. HTA Magnetische Resonantie Beel
Page 198: 108. Tiotropium in de behandeling v
show all

Pay for Quality

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?