Pay for Quality
Pay for Quality
Pay for Quality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
KCE Reports 118 <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> 165<br />
10 REFERENCES<br />
1. Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, Blais R, Brown A, Cox J, et al. The Canadian Adverse Events<br />
Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. Canadian Medical<br />
Association Journal. 2004;170(11):1678-86.<br />
2. Institute of Medicine. Rewarding provider per<strong>for</strong>mance. Aligning incentives in Medicare.<br />
Washington, D.C.: the National Academies Press; 2007.<br />
3. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system.<br />
Washington DC National Academic Press; 1999.<br />
4. Landon BE, Normand SLT, Lessler A, O'Malley AJ, Schmaltz S, Loeb JM, et al. <strong>Quality</strong> of care<br />
<strong>for</strong> the treatment of acute medical conditions in US hospitals. Archives of Internal Medicine.<br />
2006;166(22):2511-7.<br />
5. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health<br />
care delivered to adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine.<br />
2003;348(26):2635-45.<br />
6. Vincent C, Neale G, Woloshynowych M. Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary<br />
retrospective record review. British Medical Journal. 2001;322(7285):517-9.<br />
7. Zhan C, Miller MR. Excess length of stay, charges, and mortality attributable to medical injuries<br />
during hospitalization. JAMA. 2003;290(14):1868-74.<br />
8. Jacques J, Gillain D, Fecher F, Van De Sande S, Vrijens F, Ramaekers D. Studie naar<br />
praktijkverschillen bij electieve chirurgische ingrepen in Belgi‰. Brussel: Federaal<br />
9.<br />
Kenniscentrum voor de gezondheidszorg (KCE); 2006.<br />
Van den Heede K, Sermeus W, Diya L, Lesaffre E, Vleugels A. Adverse outcomes in Belgian<br />
acute hospitals: retrospective analysis of the national hospital discharge dataset. International<br />
Journal <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> in Health Care. 2006;18(3):211-9.<br />
10. Altman DE, Clancy C, Blendon RJ. Five years after the IOM report. New England Journal of<br />
Medicine. 2004;351(20):2041-3.<br />
11. Porter ME, Teisberg EO. How physicians can change the future of health care. Jama-Journal of<br />
the American Medical Association. 2007;297(10):1103-11.<br />
12. Gillen R, Tennen H, McKee T. The impact of the inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective<br />
payment system on stroke program outcomes. American Journal of Physical Medicine &<br />
Rehabilitation. 2007;86(5):356-63.<br />
13. Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS, Sutton M, Leese B, Giuffrida A, et al. Capitation, salary,<br />
fee-<strong>for</strong>-service and mixed systems of payment: effects on the behaviour of primary care<br />
physicians. Cochrane.Database.Syst.Rev. 2000(3):CD002215.<br />
14. Gray B. Do Medicaid physician fees <strong>for</strong> prenatal services affect birth outcomes? Journal of<br />
Health Economics. 2001;20(4):571-90.<br />
15. Kane RL, Johnson PE, Town RJ, Butler M. Economic incentives <strong>for</strong> preventive care.<br />
Evid.Rep.Technol.Assess.(Summ.). 2004(101):1-7.<br />
16. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME, Maglione MA, Roth EA, Grimshaw JM, et al. Interventions<br />
that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis.<br />
Ann.Intern.Med. 2002;136(9):641-51.<br />
17. Lewandowski S, O'Connor PJ, Solberg LI, Lais T, Hroscikoski M, Sperl-Hillen JM. Increasing<br />
primary care physician productivity: A case study. American Journal of Managed Care.<br />
2006;12(10):573-6.<br />
18. Formulier Va voor het beoordelen van een systematische review van randomised controlled<br />
trials. Dutch Cochrane Collaboration Centre 2008.<br />
19. EPOC Methods Paper. Including interrupted time series (ITS) designs in a EPOC review.<br />
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC); 1998.<br />
20. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance <strong>for</strong> those<br />
carrying out or commissioning reviews. York: University of York; 2001.<br />
21. EPOC specific resources <strong>for</strong> review authors. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of<br />
Care Group (EPOC); 2008.