Pay for Quality
Pay for Quality
Pay for Quality
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
KCE Reports 118 <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> 123<br />
Primary focus (structure, process<br />
outcome)<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance’ / ‘capacity and innovation’, one <strong>for</strong> clinical<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance and one <strong>for</strong> patient safety.<br />
Multidimensional feedback including further details on a<br />
selection of 12 indicators<br />
The sixth part of the contract only applied to acute hospitals.<br />
The hospitals were asked to select 12 indicators and to<br />
develop actions <strong>for</strong> improvement. They were asked to select<br />
three indicators per field and to develop them in detail: 3<br />
indicators <strong>for</strong> the field of economic per<strong>for</strong>mance, 3 <strong>for</strong><br />
capacity and innovation, 3 <strong>for</strong> clinical per<strong>for</strong>mance and 3 <strong>for</strong><br />
patient safety.<br />
Contract 2008-2009: three parts<br />
As a first part to the contract hospitals were asked to develop<br />
a multi-year patient safety plan, and based on the results of the<br />
evaluation of the patient safety culture (as per<strong>for</strong>med in the<br />
previous year) two actions needed to be developed <strong>for</strong> quality<br />
improvement in two separate domains.<br />
As a second part to the contract the hospitals were asked to<br />
analyse a process where they could freely choose between a<br />
process as suggested by the government, or a process related<br />
to intramural transfers or a process based on results from the<br />
multidimensional feedback.<br />
As a third part to the contract hospitals were asked to list all<br />
of their indicators that were used <strong>for</strong> the management of<br />
quality and safety within the hospital.<br />
Contract 2009-2010: three parts<br />
As a first part to the contract the hospitals will be asked to<br />
develop a reporting and learning system <strong>for</strong> incidents and<br />
nearly incidents. In addition the hospitals will be asked to<br />
describe five incidents including the method used <strong>for</strong> the<br />
analysis as well as the actions that were taken to achieve the<br />
necessary improvements.<br />
As a second part to the contract the hospitals will be asked to<br />
develop or to (re)analyse an existing or new process within a<br />
multidisciplinary context. They could freely choose between a<br />
process as suggested by the government, or a process related<br />
to intramural transfers or a process based on results from the<br />
multidimensional feedback.<br />
3. As a third part to the contract the hospitals will be asked to<br />
develop a multidimensional and integrated set of indicators<br />
related to quality and patient safety.<br />
The yearly contracts will always be based on the Donabedian’s<br />
triad and consist of three pillars: the development of a safety<br />
management system (structure), the analysis of processes<br />
(process) and the development of a multidimensional set of<br />
indicators (result). By 2012 all hospitals should have an<br />
integrated safety management system, assess both intramural<br />
and transmural care processes and use an integrated and<br />
multidimensional set of indicators.<br />
Type of indicators used (if any) Structure, process and outcome indicators<br />
Purpose of indicators used The purpose is hospital specific. They are mostly used as an<br />
input, based on benchmarking, to prioritize quality targets and<br />
related quality improvement strategies in a cyclical manner.<br />
Type of incentives Yearly budget<br />
Results (if available) The mission, vision, goals and strategy with regard to quality<br />
and patient safety