10.08.2013 Views

Pay for Quality

Pay for Quality

Pay for Quality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118 <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> KCE Reports 118<br />

Sources (most relevant ones) See http://www.topaseurope.eu/;<br />

249-253, 254 , 255<br />

Total budget The estimated costs are +/- €1 000 per practice per year (so <strong>for</strong><br />

Belgium €1 per patient per year)<br />

Table 13: Global medical record<br />

VII. GLOBAL MEDICAL RECORD<br />

Initiated by NIHDI (INAMI/RIZIV)<br />

Overall objective To support continuity of care between patients and GPs.<br />

Date of implementation in Belgium May 1, 1999 <strong>for</strong> a predefined population<br />

(May 1, 2002: <strong>for</strong> any patient)<br />

Target audience General practitioner and patient<br />

Content At the patient’s <strong>for</strong>mal request the GP manages the GMR that<br />

must include a selection of medical data. The objectives are to<br />

centralize the patient’s medical data, to devote this central role<br />

to the GP, to improve the communication of the patient’s data<br />

between health providers and to reduce medical shopping by<br />

gaining the loyalty of the patient.<br />

Primary focus (structure, process Process<br />

outcome)<br />

Type of indicators used (if any) Existence of a GMR with at least one contact with the patient<br />

per year<br />

Purpose of indicators used Improve coordination of care.<br />

Type of incentives Financial.<br />

<strong>Pay</strong>ment of the GP <strong>for</strong> this new service: 27.50 €/year (2009)<br />

Full reimbursement of this annual fee to the patient and a<br />

decrease of the patient’s co-payment <strong>for</strong> other services provided<br />

by the GP.<br />

Results (if available) Continuous increase of the number of GMR (globally in Belgium:<br />

44% of the insured population in 2005)<br />

Sources (most relevant ones) NIHDI (INAMI/RIZIV), insurers<br />

Total budget €104 966 317 (€27.50/GMR, based on figures 2007)<br />

Table 14: Prescription feedback<br />

VIII. PRESCRIPTION FEEDBACK (national council <strong>for</strong> quality promotion)<br />

Initiated by National Council <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Promotion<br />

Overall objective To reduce overuse of drug prescription in an evidence based way<br />

Date of implementation in Belgium 2003<br />

Target audience GP and specialists<br />

Content The goal is to encourage an EBM-driven prescription attitude.<br />

The individual feedbacks include:<br />

Analysis of the doctor’s prescription of target drugs (antibiotics,<br />

antihypertensive drugs) with reference to global Belgian<br />

prescription of the same molecules and reference to peer review<br />

group members of LOK. The median prescription level is used as<br />

reference point.<br />

Recommendations or guidelines concerning the use of the target<br />

drugs.<br />

Invitation to discuss the results in the local group of medical<br />

evaluation (GLEM/LOK)<br />

Primary focus (structure, process Process.<br />

outcome)<br />

Type of indicators used (if any) Volume and choice of prescription of target drugs<br />

Purpose of indicators used To develop doctor’s awareness to be driven by EBM prescription<br />

To decrease the volume and cost of prescribed drugs<br />

To optimize adequate choice of antibiotic

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!