10.08.2013 Views

Pay for Quality

Pay for Quality

Pay for Quality

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KCE Reports 118 <strong>Pay</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> 115<br />

Content Common conditions <strong>for</strong> GPs and specialists:<br />

A minimum amount of 60 continuing education units within the last 3<br />

years, and among them 9 units in ethics/economy and 6 gained <strong>for</strong><br />

participation in the peer-review group (GLEM/LOK)<br />

A minimal yearly activity rate (e.g. 1 250 contacts <strong>for</strong> a GP, and a<br />

minimum of 5/day)<br />

No repeated remarks from the medical profile commission (diagnosis<br />

and prescription processes)<br />

To participate in quality assessment organized by peers<br />

To take part minimum twice a year in a peer-review group<br />

(GLEM/LOK)<br />

Specific conditions <strong>for</strong> GPs:<br />

To hold a medical record <strong>for</strong> each patient and to communicate its<br />

relevant elements to other providers when necessary<br />

To be a “certified” GP<br />

To exercise as a GP as main activity and to ensure the continuity of<br />

care<br />

Specific condition <strong>for</strong> specialists:<br />

To transmit all relevant patient data to the patient’s GP<br />

Conditions <strong>for</strong> dentists:<br />

A minimum amount of 500 continuing education units per 5 years,<br />

and among them 50 units in ethics/economy/organizational domain<br />

To take part minimum twice a year in a peer-review group<br />

To participate to sporadic data collection when requested<br />

A minimal yearly activity rate of 300 contacts<br />

Primary focus (structure, process, The focus is on structures and processes.<br />

outcome)<br />

Type of indicators used (if any) No direct indicators are measured.<br />

Purpose of indicators used The providers’ accreditation was initiated to promote quality and<br />

cost-effectiveness of care. The effectiveness of inter provider linkage,<br />

through the communication of patients’ data and the<br />

complementarities of their medical specificity, and the continuing<br />

education of physicians were among the initial goals (1993). Currently,<br />

the accreditation is a kind of quality label <strong>for</strong> those who per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

continuous medical education and use the medical technologies in a<br />

wise and socially justified way.<br />

Type of incentives Doctors: Revaluation of the consultation fee (+3.27 € <strong>for</strong> a GP, from<br />

+1.07 € to +4.88 € <strong>for</strong> a specialist), fully paid by the Social Security. A<br />

flat-rate amount per year of 580 € (2009).<br />

Dentists: a flat-rate amount of 2 355.74 €/year (2009)<br />

Results (if available) In 2003, a survey (see reference below) assessed the satisfaction of<br />

participants. The doctors experienced an improvement of the quality<br />

of and the participation in continuous medical education. They quoted<br />

a better awareness of ethical, economical and qualitative aspects of<br />

their job. They experienced an improvement of their practice through<br />

a better knowledge, intercollegiate assessment and multidisciplinary<br />

working.<br />

The current conditions <strong>for</strong> obtaining the individual accreditation were<br />

considered sufficient, but the retribution should have been increased.<br />

Sources (most relevant ones)<br />

246, 247<br />

Total budget Flat-rate amounts: doctors €14 159 000, dentists €11 620 000<br />

(budget 2009).<br />

Costs within nomenclature (doctors only): €189 700 000 (2008).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!