Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
74 Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Colorectal Cancer <strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> vol.45<br />
(CRC mortality), however, are not published yet. Because of this the trial was<br />
not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the review from the NZHTA. It was however <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> a<br />
Cochrane review were the reviewers retrieved the mortality data directly from<br />
the researchers <strong>in</strong>volved 24.<br />
Another study, the Burgundy study, a French controlled study 207, 209 published <strong>in</strong><br />
June 2004, was excluded for review by the NZHTA team ma<strong>in</strong>ly because of the<br />
absence of random allocation. Nevertheless, <strong>in</strong> this very large population-based<br />
study, us<strong>in</strong>g nonrehydrated Hemoccult <strong>with</strong>out dietary restriction, all residents<br />
of several small geographical areas (12 adm<strong>in</strong>istrative districts <strong>in</strong> Burgundy for<br />
the screen<strong>in</strong>g group and 17 other adm<strong>in</strong>istrative districts correspond<strong>in</strong>g to a<br />
population of a similar size for the control group) were allocated either to<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g or to no screen<strong>in</strong>g. This <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>vit<strong>in</strong>g 45.642 subjects between the<br />
ages of 50 and 74 years, while a control group of similar size was followed<br />
<strong>with</strong>out be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formed of the study nor receiv<strong>in</strong>g any programmed screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Uptake <strong>in</strong> the first round was 52.8% and <strong>in</strong>creased slightly <strong>in</strong> subsequent rounds<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce those who clearly refused to participate were not <strong>in</strong>vited aga<strong>in</strong>. Overall<br />
69% of the <strong>in</strong>vited population participated at least once. Screen positive<br />
proportion was 2,1% <strong>in</strong> the first round and 1,4% on average thereafter, and the<br />
overall colorectal cancer mortality reduction was 16% <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tention to screen<br />
analysis and 33% <strong>in</strong> those who participated (at least once).<br />
We need to be careful, however, when compar<strong>in</strong>g these trials as there were<br />
important differences <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity (annual vs. biennial), test usage (non<br />
rehydrated vs. rehydrated), the def<strong>in</strong>ition of positivity (number of samples out<br />
of 6 that need to be positive), and ages (although all ages were between 45 and<br />
80).<br />
In spite of these caveats, the Cochrane review (most recent update 12 August<br />
2005 24) estimated the colorectal cancer mortality reduction through offer<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
(annual or biennial) Hemoccult screen<strong>in</strong>g program at 16% (95% CI: 7 - 23%) on<br />
an <strong>in</strong>tention to screen basis, and at 23% (95% CI: 11 - 43%) adjust<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g attendance. On a population level they estimated that if 10.000 people<br />
were offered a biennial Hemoccult screen<strong>in</strong>g program, and when two-thirds<br />
actively attend for at least one of the screen<strong>in</strong>g test, there would be 8,5 CRC<br />
deaths prevented (95% CI: 3,6 - 13,5 CRC deaths) over 10 years.<br />
The NZHTA 219 and the Cochrane systematic review 24 conclude that there is<br />
high quality evidence of reduction <strong>in</strong> CRC mortality, possible reduction <strong>in</strong> CRC<br />
<strong>in</strong>cidence through detection and removal of colorectal adenomas and earlier<br />
detection of cancers potentially lead<strong>in</strong>g to less <strong>in</strong>vasive surgery. They stress<br />
however that very little <strong>in</strong>formation is available from those trials, or from other<br />
studies about the potentially harmful effects of screen<strong>in</strong>g other than the direct<br />
complications of follow up colonoscopy <strong>in</strong> case of positive FOBT f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g.