Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A) Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
60 Screening for Colorectal Cancer KCE reports vol.45 5.3.4 Forth criterion The forth criterion, the presence of high quality evidence, ideally from RCTs, that a screening program is effective in reducing mortality or morbidity, will be addressed while evaluating the evidence for the various screening strategies. 5.3.5 Criteria five to eight These criteria will be evaluated all through this HTA report. To do this, however, it is important that the screening pathway is well-defined and wellunderstood. A simple representation of the screening pathway for colorectal cancer is shown in figure 14. Health Promotion Screening organisation Screening test Positive Negative Further assessment Positive Negative Treatment & Follow up Figure 14 : The colorectal screening pathway adapted from Kerr et al. 219 5.4 STRATEGIES AND TESTS CONSIDERED An essential element for a screening program to become acceptable and successful is the availability of a suitable screening test or strategy. A test should ideally be safe, simple, reliable, valid, cheap, highly sensitive and highly specific. Moreover, it should also be generally perceived as acceptable by the target population as to result in an optimal participation in screening (in the literature participation is also referred to as compliance or adherence). Clinical sensitivity and specificity are often used to compare the diagnostic capabilities of a test and they traditionally rely on the performance of a given test, used at a specific test threshold, when compared to a reference or gold standard that is supposed to give the true diagnosis. In short, with a highly sensitive test the probability that the test will indeed be positive when the person has the condition (as determined with the reference standard) will be
KCE reports vol.45 Screening for Colorectal Cancer 61 high, thereby minimising the number of false negatives. A highly specific test means that there will be a high probability that the test will have a negative result if indeed the person does not have the condition, thereby minimising the number of false positives. Other measures of assessing diagnostic performance in screening tests are the predictive values (positive and negative predictive value). These measures can be useful in clinical settings, as they indicate the probability that a person with a given test results will indeed have or not have the disease, but they are specific for the population in which they are used as they depend on the population prevalence of the condition. Therefore, they should not be used while comparing tests that were used in different populations. The same is true for concepts such as the Number Needed to Screen (NNS) as those numbers are dependent upon the population in which the intervention is applied. Most trials of screening strategies have been conducted in men and women aged 50 and up to ages 70 to 75. The obvious reason, of course, is to apply the test in a population with sufficiently high prevalence of detectable malformations. 5.4.1 Fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) Fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) is based on the nature of colorectal cancer and larger polyps to bleed intermittently. Presence of blood in the stool is therefore an indicator of cancer. The bleeding, however, is intermittent and blood is unevenly distributed throughout the stool. Additionally, the amount of bleeding is dependent on the size of the polyp(s) or cancer. Screening for the presence of blood in the stool is far less sensitive for polyps than for cancer 265. Approximately two thirds of colorectal cancers bleed in the course of a week 266 , 267, 197, thereby naturally limiting the potential clinical sensitivity of FOBT: at the moment the cancer does not bleed it can not be detected by FOBT. Moreover, non-malignant lesions can also bleed and there are still other causes for the presence of blood in the stool, thereby also limiting the potential specificity. FOBT is therefore, by definition, a non-specific test giving information on the probability of the presence of colorectal cancer. It provides no information on the localisation of the source of bleeding, but it has the advantage of being a non-invasive test. Therefore, a positive test result will necessarily call for an invasive procedure afterwards 268. Most information in the literature is found on the classical FOBT, the so-called guaiac FOBT (gFOBT). Van Deen 269 is generally credited with the discovery that gum guaiac, a natural resin extracted from the wood of Guaiacum officinale, is useful in detecting occult blood. The heme portion of hemoglobin, if present in the fecal specimen in its free form or bound to protein (globin, myoglobin, and some cytochromes), has peroxidase activity which catalyzes the oxidation of alpha guaiaconic acid (active component of the guaiac paper) by hydrogen peroxide (active component of the developer) to form a highly conjugated blue quinone compound. Degradation products of heme, that are formed in the intestine, lack peroxidase activity and, as a result, are not detected by the test. Heme enters the proximal gastrointestinal tract as hemoglobin or myoglobin in food or as red cells from bleeding lesions, and relatively little is absorbed by the small intestine. However, in the colon, heme is modified by the microflora so that it loses its peroxidase activity, and consequently guaiac tests are more sensitive for distal (colonic) than for proximal (gastric) bleeding pathology. To perform the test, fecal matter needs to be collected and applied to a testing kit. Guaiac-based FOBTs use sticks or spatulas to collect specimens from stools
- Page 20 and 21: 10 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 22 and 23: 12 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 24 and 25: 14 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 26 and 27: 16 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 28 and 29: 18 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 30 and 31: 20 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 32 and 33: 22 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 34 and 35: 24 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 36 and 37: 26 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 38 and 39: 28 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 40 and 41: 30 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 42 and 43: 32 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 44 and 45: 34 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 46 and 47: 36 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 48 and 49: 38 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 50 and 51: 40 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 52 and 53: 42 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 54 and 55: 44 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 56 and 57: 46 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 58 and 59: 48 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 60 and 61: 50 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 62 and 63: 52 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 64 and 65: 54 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 66 and 67: 56 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 68 and 69: 58 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 72 and 73: 62 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 74 and 75: 64 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 76 and 77: 66 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 78 and 79: 68 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 80 and 81: 70 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 82 and 83: 72 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 84 and 85: 74 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 86 and 87: 76 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 88 and 89: 78 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 90 and 91: 80 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 92 and 93: 82 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 94 and 95: 84 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 96 and 97: 86 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 98 and 99: 88 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 100 and 101: 90 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 102 and 103: 92 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 104 and 105: 94 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 106 and 107: 96 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 108 and 109: 98 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 110 and 111: 100 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 112 and 113: 102 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 114 and 115: 104 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 116 and 117: 106 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
- Page 118 and 119: 108 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> vol.45 Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Colorectal Cancer 61<br />
high, thereby m<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g the number of false negatives. A highly specific test<br />
means that there will be a high probability that the test will have a negative<br />
result if <strong>in</strong>deed the person does not have the condition, thereby m<strong>in</strong>imis<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
number of false positives.<br />
Other measures of assess<strong>in</strong>g diagnostic performance <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g tests are the<br />
predictive values (positive and negative predictive value). These measures can<br />
be useful <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical sett<strong>in</strong>gs, as they <strong>in</strong>dicate the probability that a person <strong>with</strong> a<br />
given test results will <strong>in</strong>deed have or not have the disease, but they are specific<br />
for the population <strong>in</strong> which they are used as they depend on the population<br />
prevalence of the condition. Therefore, they should not be used while<br />
compar<strong>in</strong>g tests that were used <strong>in</strong> different populations. The same is true for<br />
concepts such as the Number Needed to Screen (NNS) as those numbers are<br />
dependent upon the population <strong>in</strong> which the <strong>in</strong>tervention is applied.<br />
Most trials of screen<strong>in</strong>g strategies have been conducted <strong>in</strong> men and women<br />
aged 50 and up to ages 70 to 75. The obvious reason, of course, is to apply the<br />
test <strong>in</strong> a population <strong>with</strong> sufficiently high prevalence of detectable<br />
malformations.<br />
5.4.1 Fecal occult blood tests (FOBT)<br />
Fecal occult blood test<strong>in</strong>g (FOBT) is based on the nature of colorectal cancer<br />
and larger polyps to bleed <strong>in</strong>termittently. Presence of blood <strong>in</strong> the stool is<br />
therefore an <strong>in</strong>dicator of cancer. The bleed<strong>in</strong>g, however, is <strong>in</strong>termittent and<br />
blood is unevenly distributed throughout the stool. Additionally, the amount of<br />
bleed<strong>in</strong>g is dependent on the size of the polyp(s) or cancer. Screen<strong>in</strong>g for the<br />
presence of blood <strong>in</strong> the stool is far less sensitive for polyps than for cancer 265.<br />
Approximately two thirds of colorectal cancers bleed <strong>in</strong> the course of a week 266<br />
, 267, 197, thereby naturally limit<strong>in</strong>g the potential cl<strong>in</strong>ical sensitivity of FOBT: at the<br />
moment the cancer does not bleed it can not be detected by FOBT. Moreover,<br />
non-malignant lesions can also bleed and there are still other causes for the<br />
presence of blood <strong>in</strong> the stool, thereby also limit<strong>in</strong>g the potential specificity.<br />
FOBT is therefore, by def<strong>in</strong>ition, a non-specific test giv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation on the<br />
probability of the presence of colorectal cancer. It provides no <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />
the localisation of the source of bleed<strong>in</strong>g, but it has the advantage of be<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
non-<strong>in</strong>vasive test. Therefore, a positive test result will necessarily call for an<br />
<strong>in</strong>vasive procedure afterwards 268.<br />
Most <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the literature is found on the classical FOBT, the so-called<br />
guaiac FOBT (gFOBT). Van Deen 269 is generally credited <strong>with</strong> the discovery that<br />
gum guaiac, a natural res<strong>in</strong> extracted from the wood of Guaiacum offic<strong>in</strong>ale, is<br />
useful <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g occult blood. The heme portion of hemoglob<strong>in</strong>, if present <strong>in</strong><br />
the fecal specimen <strong>in</strong> its free form or bound to prote<strong>in</strong> (glob<strong>in</strong>, myoglob<strong>in</strong>, and<br />
some cytochromes), has peroxidase activity which catalyzes the oxidation of<br />
alpha guaiaconic acid (active component of the guaiac paper) by hydrogen<br />
peroxide (active component of the developer) to form a highly conjugated blue<br />
qu<strong>in</strong>one compound. Degradation products of heme, that are formed <strong>in</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e, lack peroxidase activity and, as a result, are not detected by the test.<br />
Heme enters the proximal gastro<strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al tract as hemoglob<strong>in</strong> or myoglob<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
food or as red cells from bleed<strong>in</strong>g lesions, and relatively little is absorbed by the<br />
small <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>e. However, <strong>in</strong> the colon, heme is modified by the microflora so<br />
that it loses its peroxidase activity, and consequently guaiac tests are more<br />
sensitive for distal (colonic) than for proximal (gastric) bleed<strong>in</strong>g pathology.<br />
To perform the test, fecal matter needs to be collected and applied to a test<strong>in</strong>g<br />
kit. Guaiac-based FOBTs use sticks or spatulas to collect specimens from stools