10.08.2013 Views

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> vol.45 Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Colorectal Cancer 55<br />

Key messages<br />

All guidel<strong>in</strong>es recommend that CRC screen<strong>in</strong>g should be offered to<br />

average (low) risk patients 50 year and otherwise asymptomatic.<br />

All guidel<strong>in</strong>es recommend that colonoscopy should be used for the<br />

follow-up of test positive subjects.<br />

Guidel<strong>in</strong>es disagree on optimal ages of screen<strong>in</strong>g ( 50, 50 - 70, 50 -<br />

75, 50 - 80) and on which test and which modalities to choose.<br />

Screen<strong>in</strong>g benefits <strong>in</strong>clude reduction <strong>in</strong> colorectal cancer mortality,<br />

possible reduction <strong>in</strong> cancer <strong>in</strong>cidence through detection and<br />

removal of colorectal adenomas and potentially less <strong>in</strong>vasive<br />

therapy due to early treatment of colorectal cancers.<br />

If FOBT is chosen as primary mass screen<strong>in</strong>g test, unrehydrated<br />

home-adm<strong>in</strong>istered FOBT is univocally recommended, requir<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

patient to collect and submit 3 stool test cards, each card <strong>with</strong> 2<br />

separate stool samples from each of 3 consecutive bowel<br />

movements.<br />

S<strong>in</strong>gle office-based FOBT obta<strong>in</strong>ed at the time of a digital rectal<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ation is disapproved.<br />

There is no justification for repeat<strong>in</strong>g FOBT after an <strong>in</strong>itial positive<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

In many countries experts and public health decision makers are<br />

reluctant to set up a systematic national population screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

program because of low sensitivity of the common guaiac screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

test Hemoccult II added to observed moderate compliance rates,<br />

even <strong>with</strong> participation enhancement strategies.<br />

All guidel<strong>in</strong>es recommend total colonoscopy as the first choice<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g method for population subgroups at <strong>in</strong>creased CRC risk<br />

as well as for surveillance.<br />

Guidel<strong>in</strong>es are not concordant on risk stratification, cut-off ages and<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g or surveillance frequency, nor on evidence rat<strong>in</strong>g scales.<br />

Screen<strong>in</strong>g recommendations for populations subgroups at<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased risk are empiric and comb<strong>in</strong>e the known effectiveness of<br />

available screen<strong>in</strong>g tools <strong>with</strong> the observed risks associated <strong>with</strong> a<br />

positive family history of CRC.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!