Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> vol.45 Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Colorectal Cancer 43<br />
Risk level<br />
Average<br />
Moderate<br />
High<br />
Table 9: ASGE stratification on CRC risk - 2004<br />
Lifetime risk<br />
of CRC<br />
Age > 50 y 5% - 6%<br />
Chronic colitis due to ulcerative colitis or Crohns disease 20%<br />
Familial risk: 1st degree relative <strong>with</strong> CRC 10% - 20%<br />
Familial polyposis 100%<br />
HNPCC 80%<br />
Familial aggregation, a primary theme <strong>in</strong> genetic epidemiology, can be estimated<br />
from family studies based on an <strong>in</strong>dex person. The excess risk due to the<br />
presence of affected family members can be classified accord<strong>in</strong>g to whether<br />
disease <strong>in</strong> the relatives is considered a risk factor for the <strong>in</strong>dex person (type I<br />
relative risk) or whether the disease status of the <strong>in</strong>dex person is considered a<br />
risk factor for the relatives (type II relative risk). Type I relative risks are useful<br />
<strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical counsell<strong>in</strong>g sett<strong>in</strong>gs when an <strong>in</strong>dividual wants to know his/her disease<br />
risk given his or her family history. Type II relative risks can be used to quantify<br />
the risk of disease to relatives of an affected <strong>in</strong>dividual and then identify subjects<br />
eligible for screen<strong>in</strong>g. A meta-analysis of published colorectal cancer studies<br />
report<strong>in</strong>g a measure of familial association 114 <strong>with</strong> application of multilevel l<strong>in</strong>ear<br />
regression to model age-specific relative risks showed that the pooled type I<br />
relative risk of colorectal cancer given any affected first-degree relative (based<br />
on 20 studies) was 2,26 (95% CI: 1,86 - 2,73) and decreased <strong>with</strong> the age of the<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual. The pooled type II estimate (based on seven studies) was 2,81 (95%<br />
CI: 2,05 - 3,85).<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, Butterworth et al. from the Cambridge Public Health Genetics Unit<br />
recently published a systematic review 148 of the literature on familial risks of<br />
colorectal cancer. Fifty-n<strong>in</strong>e studies were identified <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 47 that estimated<br />
the relative risk of develop<strong>in</strong>g colorectal cancer given at least one affected firstdegree<br />
relative. Pooled risk estimates are summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 10.<br />
Table 10: Pooled estimations of RR and Lifetime Risk of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
CRC - Butterworth et al. - 2006<br />
Family History Relative Risk for CRC Lifetime risk at 50 years<br />
One first-degree relative <strong>with</strong><br />
colorectal cancer<br />
More than one first-degree<br />
relative <strong>with</strong> colorectal cancer<br />
3.3.5 Economic evaluations<br />
2,24 (95% CI: 2,06 - 2,43) 3,4% (95% CI: 2,8 to 4,0)<br />
3,97 (95% CI: 2,60 - 6,06) 6,9% (95% CI: 4,5 to 10,4)<br />
Recently, a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary economic analysis of family history assessment to detect<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased risk for colorectal cancer was published by Ramsey et al 111. The<br />
authors developed a decision model to compare costs and outcomes for two<br />
scenarios: (a) standard population screen<strong>in</strong>g start<strong>in</strong>g at age 50; (b) family history<br />
assessment at age 40, followed by screen<strong>in</strong>g colonoscopy at age 40 for those<br />
<strong>with</strong> a suggestive family history of colorectal cancer. The analysis was conducted