Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
228 Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Colorectal Cancer <strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> vol.45<br />
200. Greenwald B. From guaiac to immune fecal occult blood tests: the emergence of<br />
technology <strong>in</strong> colorectal cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2005;28(2):90-6.<br />
201. Hughes K, Leggett B, Del Mar C, Croese J, Fairley S, Masson J, et al. Guaiac versus<br />
immunochemical tests: faecal occult blood test screen<strong>in</strong>g for colorectal cancer <strong>in</strong> a<br />
rural community. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health.<br />
2005;29(4):358-64.<br />
202. Launoy GD, Bertrand HJ, Berchi C, Talbourdet VY, Guizard AVN, Bouvier VM, et al.<br />
Evaluation of an immunochemical fecal occult blood test <strong>with</strong> automated read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g for colorectal cancer <strong>in</strong> a general average-risk population. International<br />
Journal of Cancer. 2005;115(3):493-6.<br />
203. Vilk<strong>in</strong> A, Rozen P, Levi Z, Waked A, Maoz E, Birkenfeld S, et al. Performance<br />
characteristics and evaluation of an automated-developed and quantitative,<br />
immunochemical, fecal occult blood screen<strong>in</strong>g test. The American journal of<br />
gastroenterology. 2005;100(11):2519-25.<br />
204. Levi Z, Hazazi R, Rozen P, Vilk<strong>in</strong> A, Waked A, Niv Y. A quantitative immunochemical<br />
faecal occult blood test is more efficient for detect<strong>in</strong>g significant colorectal neoplasia<br />
than a sensitive guaiac test. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics May.<br />
2006;23(9):1359-64.<br />
205. Li S, Wang H, Hu J, Li N, Liu Y, Wu Z, et al. New immunochemical fecal occult<br />
blood test <strong>with</strong> two-consecutive stool sample test<strong>in</strong>g is a cost-effective approach for<br />
colon cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g: results of a prospective multicenter study <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese<br />
patients. International Journal of Cancer. 2006;118(12):3078-83.<br />
206. Pignone M, Campbell MK, Carr C, Phillips C. Meta-analysis of dietary restriction<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g fecal occult blood test<strong>in</strong>g. Eff Cl<strong>in</strong> Pract. 2001;4(4):150-6.<br />
207. Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C, Tazi MA, Lamour J, Gerard D, et al. Reduction <strong>in</strong><br />
colorectal cancer mortality by fecal occult blood screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a French controlled<br />
study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126(7):1674-80.<br />
208. Kronborg O, Jorgensen OD, Fenger C, Rasmussen M. Randomized study of biennial<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>with</strong> a faecal occult blood test: results after n<strong>in</strong>e screen<strong>in</strong>g rounds. Scand J<br />
Gastroenterol. 2004;39(9):846-51.<br />
209. Heresbach D, Manfredi S, D'Hallu<strong>in</strong> P N, Bretagne JF, Branger B. Review <strong>in</strong> depth<br />
and meta-analysis of controlled trials on colorectal cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g by faecal occult<br />
blood test. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18(4):427-33.<br />
210. Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, Arrigoni A, Bisanti L, Cardelli A, et al. Randomized<br />
trial of different screen<strong>in</strong>g strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and<br />
detection rates. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2005;97(5):347-57.<br />
211. Stokamer CL, Tenner CT, Chaudhuri J, Vazquez E, B<strong>in</strong>i EJ. Randomized controlled<br />
trial of the impact of <strong>in</strong>tensive patient education on compliance <strong>with</strong> fecal occult<br />
blood test<strong>in</strong>g. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(3):278-82.<br />
212. Thorpe LE, Mostashari F, Hajat A, Nash D, Karpati A, Weber T, et al. Colon cancer<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g practices <strong>in</strong> New York City, 2003: results of a large random-digit dialed<br />
telephone survey. Cancer. 2005;104(5):1075-82.<br />
213. Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS. Factors associated <strong>with</strong> colon cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
The role of patient factors and physician counsel<strong>in</strong>g. Preventive Medic<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
2005;41(1):23-9.<br />
214. Wei EK, Ryan CT, Dietrich AJ, Colditz GA. Improv<strong>in</strong>g colorectal cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
by target<strong>in</strong>g office systems <strong>in</strong> primary care practices: dissem<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g research results<br />
<strong>in</strong>to cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(6):661-6.<br />
215. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI.<br />
Priorities among effective cl<strong>in</strong>ical preventive services results of a systematic review<br />
and analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medic<strong>in</strong>e. 2006;31(1):52-61.<br />
216. Walker A, Whynes DK. Participation and Screen<strong>in</strong>g Programmes for Colorectal<br />
Cancer: More Would Be Better? Journal of Health Economics. 1991;10(2):207-25.