10.08.2013 Views

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

226 Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Colorectal Cancer <strong>KCE</strong> <strong>reports</strong> vol.45<br />

159. Schulmann K, Brasch FE, Kunstmann E, Engel C, Pagenstecher C, Vogelsang H, et al.<br />

HNPCC-associated small bowel cancer: cl<strong>in</strong>ical and molecular characteristics.<br />

Gastroenterology. 2005;128(3):590-9.<br />

160. Velayos FS, Allen BA, Conrad PG, Gum J, Jr., Kakar S, Chung DC, et al. Low rate of<br />

microsatellite <strong>in</strong>stability <strong>in</strong> young patients <strong>with</strong> adenomas: reassess<strong>in</strong>g the Bethesda<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2005;100(5):1143-9.<br />

161. Potter JD. Colorectal cancer: molecules and populations. J Natl Cancer Inst.<br />

1999;91(11):916-32.<br />

162. Huang SC, Lav<strong>in</strong>e JE, Boland PS, Newbury RO, Kolodner R, Pham TT, et al.<br />

Germl<strong>in</strong>e characterization of early-aged onset of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal<br />

cancer. Journal of Pediatrics. 2001;138(5):629-35.<br />

163. Christensen M, Katballe N, Wikman F, Primdahl H, Sorensen FB, Laurberg S, et al.<br />

Antibody-based screen<strong>in</strong>g for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

compared <strong>with</strong> microsatellite analysis and sequenc<strong>in</strong>g. Cancer. 2002;95(11):2422-30.<br />

164. Jo W-S, Chung DC. Genetics of hereditary colorectal cancer. Sem<strong>in</strong>ars <strong>in</strong> Oncology.<br />

2005;32(1):11-23.<br />

165. Marroni F, Pastrello C, Benatti P, Torr<strong>in</strong>i M, Barana D, Cordisco EL, et al. A genetic<br />

model for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g MSH2 and MLH1 carrier probabilities based on family history<br />

and tumor microsatellite <strong>in</strong>stability. Cl<strong>in</strong>ical Genetics. 2006;69(3):254-62.<br />

166. Stormorken AT, Hoff G, Norste<strong>in</strong> J, Bowitz-Lothe IM, Hanslien E, Gr<strong>in</strong>dedal E, et al.<br />

Estimated prevalence of hereditary cancers and the need for surveillance <strong>in</strong> a<br />

Norwegian county, Telemark. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006;41(1):71-9.<br />

167. Ramsey SD, Yoon P, Moones<strong>in</strong>ghe R, Khoury MJ. Population-based study of the<br />

prevalence of family history of cancer: implications for cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

prevention. Genetics <strong>in</strong> Medic<strong>in</strong>e. 2006;8(9):571-5.<br />

168. Mitchell RJ, Campbell H, Farr<strong>in</strong>gton SM, Brewster DH, Porteous MEM, Dunlop MG.<br />

Prevalence of family history of colorectal cancer <strong>in</strong> the general population. British<br />

Journal of Surgery. 2005;92(9):1161-4.<br />

169. Field MJL, K.N.,. Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice. From development to use.<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton D.C.: National academy press; 1992.<br />

170. University of Oxford. Centre for Evidence-Based Medic<strong>in</strong>e. http://www.cebm.net/.<br />

2006.<br />

171. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamp<strong>in</strong>g DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CF, Askham J, et al.<br />

Consensus development methods, and their use <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical guidel<strong>in</strong>e development.<br />

Health Technology Assessment (W<strong>in</strong>chester, England). 1998;2(3):i-iv.<br />

172. Lohr KN, Carey TS. Assess<strong>in</strong>g "best evidence": issues <strong>in</strong> grad<strong>in</strong>g the quality of studies<br />

for systematic reviews. Jo<strong>in</strong>t Commission Journal on Quality Improvement.<br />

1999;25(9):470-9.<br />

173. AHRQ. Publication No. 02-E015: Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence.<br />

2002.<br />

174. AGREE collaboration. Appraisal of Guidel<strong>in</strong>es Research and Evaluation (AGREE)<br />

Instrument. 2001.<br />

175. NICE. The guidel<strong>in</strong>e development process - an overview for stakeholders, the public<br />

and the NHS (second edition). 2006.<br />

176. SIGN. SIGN 50: A guidel<strong>in</strong>e developers' handbook. 2001;Publication No.50.<br />

177. NICE. The guidel<strong>in</strong>es manual 2006. 2006.<br />

178. Woolf SH. Practice guidel<strong>in</strong>es, a new reality <strong>in</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e. II. Methods of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es. Archives of Internal Medic<strong>in</strong>e. 1992;152(5):946-52.<br />

179. ACCP. Recommendations on cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the European union. Advisory<br />

Committee on Cancer Prevention. Eur J Cancer. 2000;36(12):1473-8.<br />

180. ICSI. Colorectal Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

http://www.icsi.org/display_file.asp?FileId=148&title=Colorectal%20Cancer%20Scree<br />

n<strong>in</strong>g. 2006.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!