Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6 Screening for Colorectal Cancer KCE reports vol.45 ESR Age standardised incidence rate, using the European Standard Population (n/100.000 person years) EU European Union FAP Familial Adenomatous Polyposis FDR First Degree Relative FIT Faecal Immunochemic Test = iFOBT FNR False Negative Rate FOBT Faecal Occult Blood Test FPR False Positive Rate FS Flexible Sigmoidoscopy GCP Good Clinical Practice gFOBT Guaiac Faecal Occult Blood Test GP General Practitioner HAS Haute Autorité de Santé HC/PR Health Care/Prevention Recommendations HCR Health Care Recommendation HMO Health Maintenance Organization HNPCC Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer HTA Health Technology Assessment IBD Inflammatory Bowel Disease ICER Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio ICSI Institute of Clinical Systems Improvement ICT ImmunoChemical Test = iFOBT iFOBT Immunochemical Faecal Occult Blood Test IKC Integraal Kanker Centrum (Netherlands) ITS Intention To Screen ITT Intention To Treat JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute M2 - PK M2 Pyruvate kinase MOH Ministry of Health (NZ) MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging MSI Microsatellite instability NCCN National Comprehensive Cancer Network NCI National Cancer Institute (USA) NGC National Guidelines Clearinghouse NHC National Health Committee (NZ) NHS National Health Service (UK) NHS EED NHS Economic Evaluation database NNS Number Needed to Screen NPV Negative Predictive Value NSU National Screening Unit (NZ) NZ New Zealand NZD New Zealand dollars NZGG New Zealand Guidelines Group NZHTA New Zealand Health Technology Assessment OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development oFOBT office-based FOBT OMGE Organisation Mondiale de Gastro-Entérologie OR Odds Ratio p.a. per annum PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction PPV Positive Predictive Value
KCE reports vol.45 Screening for Colorectal Cancer 7 QALY Quality Adjusted Life Years RCT Randomized Controlled Trial RR Relative Risk RRR Relative Risk Reduction SD Standard Deviation SDR Second Degree Relative Se Sensitivity SEER Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registry SG Screening Group SIGN Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network SFED Société Française d'Endoscopie Digestive Sp Specificity TCE Total Colon Evaluation TCR Two Close Relatives TDR Third Degree Relative TPR True Positive Rate UICC Union Internationale Contre le Cancer - International Union Againt Cancer UK United Kingdom UMHS University of Michigan Health System US United States of America USD United States dollars USPSTF U.S. Preventive Services Task Force VA Veterans Affairs WGO World Gastroenterlogy Organisation WHO World Health Organization WSR Age standardised incidence rate, using the World Standard Population (n/100.000 person years)
Page 1 and 2: Health Technology Assessment Colore
Page 3 and 4: Health Technology Assessment Colore
Page 5 and 6: KCE reports vol.45A Colorectale Kan
Page 7 and 8: KCE reports vol.45A Colorectale Kan
Page 9: KCE reports vol.45A Colorectale Kan
Page 12 and 13: 2 Screening for Colorectal Cancer K
Page 20 and 21: 10 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Page 66 and 67:
56 Screening for Colorectal Cancer
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 259 and 260:
This page is left intentionally bla
Page 261:
KCE reports 1. Effectiviteit en kos
show all

Report in English with a Dutch summary (KCE reports 45A)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?