10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />

US federal and state policies<br />

In the 1990s, US federal and especially state policies were designed to mandate medical<br />

schools to "produce" more PCPs, which resulted in proportions of PCPs graduates<br />

reaching 25 to 35% in 1995, short of the 50% target however 150 . The particularity of<br />

these state policies is that they were not intrusive, they were unfunded mandates and<br />

mostly signals to hold medical schools accountable for producing more PCPs 150 .<br />

G<strong>en</strong>eralist Physician Initiative<br />

Private initiatives were also launched, e.g. the Robert Wood Foundation, which<br />

provided financial support to the G<strong>en</strong>eralist Physician Initiative (GPI) in 13 universities<br />

(1991-2001), targeting the supply of family practitioners, g<strong>en</strong>eral internists, and g<strong>en</strong>eral<br />

pediatricians 26 , 48 , 151 . Several aspects of the GPI are close to what was observed in<br />

Belgium with the developm<strong>en</strong>t of Academic C<strong>en</strong>ters of G<strong>en</strong>eral Medicine. The<br />

G<strong>en</strong>eralist Physician Initiative helped catalyze educational reform in medical schools that<br />

had had little educational change in two to three decades. Those changes included:<br />

• elevating g<strong>en</strong>eralist faculty into major leadership roles,<br />

• instituting new administrative structures to coordinate g<strong>en</strong>eralist<br />

activities,<br />

• increasing the number of g<strong>en</strong>eralist faculty.<br />

Some changes the schools carried out to promote g<strong>en</strong>eral practice were for example:<br />

• changing the admissions process to target more stud<strong>en</strong>ts with GP<br />

pot<strong>en</strong>tial, along with increasing the number of GPs on admissions<br />

committees,<br />

• developing high school and college undergraduate recruitm<strong>en</strong>t<br />

programs,<br />

• redesigning undergraduate medical education to include the primarycare<br />

community experi<strong>en</strong>ces, GP-ori<strong>en</strong>ted clinical medicine courses<br />

and GP clerkships.<br />

The G<strong>en</strong>eralist Physician Initiative increased output of GPs by approximately 39% during<br />

the course of the program, from a baseline of 26.4 % of graduates in 1988­1991 to<br />

36.7% of graduates in 1999. By 2000, there had be<strong>en</strong> a decline in GP graduates to 32.8<br />

perc<strong>en</strong>t of all graduates, so the final increase was 24 perc<strong>en</strong>t. Note that this tr<strong>en</strong>d in<br />

increased production of GPs may not be attributed solely to the GPI and that it is not<br />

either stable: national data show that after the mid-1990s peak, the number of PCPs is<br />

leveling off in the mid-2000s 152 . The causal effect of the GPI is th<strong>en</strong> questionable, and<br />

other inc<strong>en</strong>tives and determinants of career choice by physicians should be considered.<br />

Specific US initiatives for rural and deprived areas<br />

Since there is little evid<strong>en</strong>ce to support the idea that distributional issues would resolve<br />

by themselves, several education programs were developed in parallel by US medical<br />

schools to attract and train future GPs, with an acc<strong>en</strong>t on rural practice and<br />

underserved communities for some initiatives. Programs were initiated in the 1970s and<br />

the 1980s and are still operating (see Geyman et al 2000 153 and McDonald et al 2002<br />

154 ). Some of these programs were evaluated. See the following refer<strong>en</strong>ces : 50 , 56 , 57 , 87 , 89<br />

, 94 , 119 , 122 , 123 , 148 , 155 , 156 , 157 .<br />

All these programs concern small numbers of physicians (about 30 to 100/year).<br />

Common features of these programs include:<br />

• selection of stud<strong>en</strong>ts with rural background, with service ori<strong>en</strong>tation<br />

and interests in family medicine,<br />

• education in community medicine,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!