10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />

The multivariate model w (app<strong>en</strong>dix 3.8, table 6) confirms the negative relationship<br />

betwe<strong>en</strong> the perception the GP profession as a solitary one and becoming a GP (odds<br />

ratio 0.429 [95% CI (0,225-0,818)]).<br />

3.6.3.2 Variety and routine in the work of the GP<br />

Five intermediate effect sizes are also noticed (≥ 0,3); ’GPs have the privilege of working<br />

with pati<strong>en</strong>ts in differ<strong>en</strong>t stages of their life’, ‘GPs have a lot of variety in their work’,<br />

‘There is a lot of routine work involved in being a GP‘, ‘GPs have a lot of possibilities to<br />

study in sub domains’ and ‘GPs have lots of opportunities to do sci<strong>en</strong>tific research’. The<br />

future GP stud<strong>en</strong>ts do more agree on all but one of those statem<strong>en</strong>ts: the perception<br />

about the routine work of a GP is more pres<strong>en</strong>t among non-GP stud<strong>en</strong>ts. In the binary<br />

logistic regression only the three latter statem<strong>en</strong>ts seem to be significant for the chance<br />

of becoming a GP. Wh<strong>en</strong> stud<strong>en</strong>ts agree with the fact that there are future<br />

opportunities for GPs to study in sub domains and do sci<strong>en</strong>tific research, the odds<br />

ratios they really choose the GP profession rises up to respectively 2.578 [95% CI<br />

(1,155-5,753)] and 3.793 [95% CI (1,987-7,240)]. The idea that GPs have a lot of career<br />

opportunities is more pres<strong>en</strong>t among stud<strong>en</strong>ts in the Dutch speaking part of the<br />

country. Wh<strong>en</strong> stud<strong>en</strong>ts have the opinion that there is a lot of routine work involved in<br />

the GP profession, the chance is only about 19% (odds ratio 0.240 [95% CI (0,121-<br />

0,476)]) that they opted for GP.<br />

3.6.3.3 Stress, autonomy, availability<br />

Other small associations were found concerning the perception of the working<br />

conditions. In particular GPs are subject a great degree to the pressures and demands of<br />

pati<strong>en</strong>ts’ (effect size = 0,222), ‘The profession of GP allows you to work autonomously<br />

and I think that is an advantage’ (effect size = 0,211), ‘GPs need to be perman<strong>en</strong>tly<br />

available’ (effect size = 0,209) and ‘As long as it is well organized, the profession of GP<br />

makes for a good combination with family life’ (effect size = 0,105). Future GPs<br />

perceive a higher level of autonomy in the GP profession higher than stud<strong>en</strong>ts who<br />

chose another specialty. GP stud<strong>en</strong>ts are also more positive about the combination of<br />

work and family. In g<strong>en</strong>eral, they do less agree about the fact that GPs need to be<br />

constantly available for their pati<strong>en</strong>ts. Maybe the latter is connected with the findings<br />

that future GPs do not seem to experi<strong>en</strong>ce the pressure and demand of pati<strong>en</strong>ts in such<br />

a great degree as the other sev<strong>en</strong>th year stud<strong>en</strong>ts and they experi<strong>en</strong>ce more respect<br />

from pati<strong>en</strong>ts (mean 4,2 and 4,5).<br />

The multivariate model (app<strong>en</strong>dix 3.8, table 6) confirms those findings. The odds ratio<br />

of becoming a GP wh<strong>en</strong> agreed with ‘GPs get a lot of respect from pati<strong>en</strong>ts’ is about<br />

2.609 [95% CI (1,111-6,126)] and about 0.471 [95% CI (0,242-0,916)] wh<strong>en</strong> agreed with<br />

‘GPs are subject a great degree to the pressures and demands of pati<strong>en</strong>ts’.<br />

3.6.3.4 Complexity of the work<br />

Other small but statistically significant differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> stud<strong>en</strong>ts who choose to<br />

become a specialist and those who choose to become a GP can be noticed in the<br />

perception of the complexity of the work of a g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioner (‘The profession of<br />

GP is a difficult discipline because you have to know a lot about all differ<strong>en</strong>t fields’ and<br />

‘The profession of GP is difficult because you oft<strong>en</strong> have to deal with uncertainties’). On<br />

the average GP stud<strong>en</strong>ts experi<strong>en</strong>ced the GP specialty as more difficult. But these items<br />

had high scores in both groups.<br />

3.6.3.5 Technology in the GP profession<br />

The final differ<strong>en</strong>ce to be m<strong>en</strong>tioned is the perception about the use of technology in<br />

GP practice. Future GPs value technology as more important in the GP discipline than<br />

w Before putting the statem<strong>en</strong>ts in a binary logistic regression the answering were dichotomised. E.g.<br />

completely disagree, disagree and disagree a bit became ‘disagree’ and agree a bit, agree and completely<br />

disagree became ‘agree’.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!