Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
KCE Reports 90 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion 49<br />
Table 7: Crosstab dichotomous and ordinal variables with respect to their<br />
experi<strong>en</strong>ce during medical education and specialty choice sev<strong>en</strong>th year<br />
stud<strong>en</strong>ts<br />
Stud<strong>en</strong>ts who<br />
choose another<br />
specialty than<br />
GP (%)<br />
Stud<strong>en</strong>ts who<br />
choose to<br />
become a GP<br />
(%)<br />
Cramer's<br />
V<br />
P-value<br />
Cramer's<br />
V n<br />
Wh<strong>en</strong> were you absolutely sure about your choice to continue your studies? 0,178 0,005 403<br />
Before I started studying medicine 5,9 7,6<br />
During theory training 21,7 12,2<br />
During clerkship 66,2 79,4<br />
I’m not sure yet about my choice 6,3 0,8<br />
Did you already have following experi<strong>en</strong>ces with g<strong>en</strong>eral practice?<br />
Lectures 89,1 81,0 0,110 0,025 411<br />
Tutorials 75,2 83,3 0,093 0,060 408<br />
GP Clerkship in 1st or 2nd year 37,1 38,2 0,011 0,832 390<br />
GP Clerkship in 3rd or 4th year 53,9 56,2 0,022 0,664 404<br />
GP Clerkship in 5th or 6th year 57,0 63,5 0,062 0,211 400<br />
Did the following experi<strong>en</strong>ces have an influ<strong>en</strong>ce on your choice of specialty?<br />
Lectures about basic disciplines 0,141 0,015 418<br />
Yes 53,9 44,2<br />
No 41,1 54,3<br />
No experi<strong>en</strong>ce 5,0 1,4<br />
Lectures about g<strong>en</strong>eral practice 0,074 0,315 418<br />
Yes 35,8 40,3<br />
No 56,3 48,9<br />
No experi<strong>en</strong>ce 7,9 10,8<br />
Lectures about specialties 0,232 0,000 418<br />
Yes 69,2 51,1<br />
No 27,2 48,9<br />
No experi<strong>en</strong>ce 3,6 0,0<br />
Tutorials 0,060 0,466 419<br />
Yes 41,8 38,1<br />
No 51,1 56,8<br />
No experi<strong>en</strong>ce 7,1 5,0<br />
GP Clerkship 0,383 0,000 416<br />
Yes 36,5 77,0<br />
No 46,2 15,8<br />
No experi<strong>en</strong>ce 17,3 7,2<br />
Has the image of the profession of GP changed/evolved since you started your studies? 0,041 0,405 418<br />
Yes 75,8 79,4<br />
What, in your opinion, defined the image that you have today about GPs?<br />
Lectures 43,2 20,0 0,229 0,000 418<br />
Media 10,8 5,7 0,084 0,086 417<br />
Personal experi<strong>en</strong>ce 61,2 61,4 0,003 0,956 418<br />
Clerkship 73,4 84,3 0,122 0,012 418<br />
Other 11,5 13,6 0,030 0,544 418<br />
Who, in your opinion, defined the image that you have today about GPs?<br />
Family / acquaintance working in the medical sector 25,5 30,2 0,050 0,311 417<br />
Family / acquaintance not working in the medical sector 10,8 19,3 0,117 0,017 418<br />
Lecturers, assistants 52,2 39,3 0,122 0,013 418<br />
Supervisor of practical training 58,6 80,0 0,213 0,000 418<br />
Own g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioner 42,4 36,4 0,058 0,237 418<br />
Other 10,8 10,0 0,012 0,803 418<br />
3.6.2.1 Importance of theory lectures<br />
The P-value of Cramer’s V (0.005) shows that there is a statistically significant differ<strong>en</strong>ce<br />
betwe<strong>en</strong> the stud<strong>en</strong>ts who choose to become a GP and those who choose another<br />
specialty. For the latter, theory classes also seem to play an important role for reaching<br />
certainty about their specialty choice (21,7%). After control for g<strong>en</strong>der and possible