10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Total 7th year<br />

stud<strong>en</strong>ts<br />

inscribed<br />

response rate<br />

34 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />

3.4.2.2 Participants<br />

During a 2-month period (half December 2007 – half February 2008) the questionnaire<br />

was distributed among all sev<strong>en</strong>th year stud<strong>en</strong>ts of all sev<strong>en</strong> Belgian universities offering<br />

masters level (KULeuv<strong>en</strong>, UA, UCL, UG<strong>en</strong>t, ULB, ULG and VUB).<br />

The VUB and ULG took care of the distribution themselves. At the KULeuv<strong>en</strong>, UA,<br />

UCL, UG<strong>en</strong>t and ULB a researcher of the team communicated with the stud<strong>en</strong>ts about<br />

the research, asked for their participation, made clear that the participation was on a<br />

voluntary basis and that anonymity was guaranteed. The response rate was betwe<strong>en</strong> 90<br />

and 39 % according to the universities. The initial balance betwe<strong>en</strong> g<strong>en</strong>ders in the<br />

population of stud<strong>en</strong>ts was 40.9% m<strong>en</strong> (n=314) and 59.1% wom<strong>en</strong> (n=454). The<br />

response rates in each g<strong>en</strong>der group were respectively 52.5% for m<strong>en</strong> (n=165) and<br />

69.6% for wom<strong>en</strong> (n=316).<br />

Table 1 shows the overall response rate equal to 62,9% (from 39.2 to 89.6% according<br />

to the universities). KUL and UCL are the universities that are most repres<strong>en</strong>ted<br />

(respectively 30,6% and 22,4%).<br />

Table 1: Response rate for each university<br />

KUL UA UCL UG<strong>en</strong>t ULB ULG VUB TOTAL<br />

n 218 48 157 122 102 92 29 768<br />

(%) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100)<br />

n 148 43 108 87 40 38 19 483<br />

° in correspond<strong>en</strong>ce<br />

with the 7th year<br />

stud<strong>en</strong>ts inscribed<br />

in a university (%)<br />

° in correspond<strong>en</strong>ce<br />

with the total<br />

response rate (%)<br />

(67,89) (89,58) (68,79) (71,31) (39,22) (41,30) (65,52) (62,89)<br />

(30,64) (8,90) (22,36) (18,01) (8,28) (7,87) (3,93) (100,00)<br />

Table 2 shows the response rate by specialty choice and g<strong>en</strong>der. Nearly all stud<strong>en</strong>ts<br />

(87,2%) already knew for certain their further career path: 29,3% opted for g<strong>en</strong>eral<br />

practice and 58,0% for other specialties.<br />

Table 2: Response rate by specialty choice and g<strong>en</strong>der<br />

GP without doubt<br />

other specialty<br />

without doubt<br />

in doubt about<br />

further career path<br />

TOTAL<br />

respond<strong>en</strong>ts man woman man woman man woman<br />

n n N n n n n<br />

(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%)<br />

KUL 148 14 37 35 47 6 8<br />

(100) (9,5) (25,10) (23,6) (31,8) (4,1) (5,4)<br />

UA 43 4 3 12 17 3 3<br />

(100) (9,3) (7,0) (27,9) (39,5) (7,0) (7,0)<br />

UCL 108 5 28 26 40 2 5<br />

(100) (4,7) (26,2) (24,3) (37,4) (1,9) (4,7)<br />

UG<strong>en</strong>t 87 7 21 15 39 2 2<br />

(100) (8,0) (24,1) (17,2) (44,8) (2,3) (2,3)<br />

ULB 40 0 5 10 12 4 7<br />

(100) (0,00) (12,8) (25,6) (30,8) (10,3) (17,9)<br />

ULg 38 3 8 6 9 2 7<br />

(100) (7,9) (21,1) (15,8) (23,7) (5,3) (18,4)<br />

VUB 19 2 4 4 8 1 0<br />

(100) (10,5) (21,1) (21,1) (42,1) (5,3) (0,00)<br />

TOTAL 483 35 106 108 172 20 32<br />

(100) (7,3) (22,0) (22,4) (35,6) (4,1) (6,6)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!