10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

G<strong>en</strong>eral<br />

practitioners<br />

*<br />

Specialists<br />

KCE Reports 90 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion 13<br />

Table 5: Inactivity among unlic<strong>en</strong>sed and lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs and specialists four to<br />

six years after their degree as MD: perc<strong>en</strong>tages and numbers by g<strong>en</strong>der. A<br />

study of four groups qualified as MD betwe<strong>en</strong> 1988 and 2001, in Belgium<br />

(CIPMP database, 2007)<br />

Cohorts<br />

Qualified as MD in Qualified as MD Qualified as MD in Qualified as MD in<br />

88, 89, 90<br />

% inactive in<br />

in 93, 94, 95<br />

96, 97, 98 99, 2000, 01<br />

the curative<br />

% inactive in<br />

% Inactive in<br />

% inactive in<br />

sector** in total the curative total the curative total the curative total<br />

1994 number sector in 1999 nber sector in 2002 nber sector in 2005 nber<br />

Wome<br />

n 17.57 444 14.79 311 25.15 489 21.44 709<br />

M<strong>en</strong> 8.40 500 11.97 259 15.41 318 15.42 428<br />

Total<br />

Wome<br />

12.7 944 13.51 570 21.31 807 19.2 1137<br />

n 1.89 476 2.26 619 1.84 761 2.45 856<br />

M<strong>en</strong> 1.11 995 0.96 936 1.49 803 1.82 822<br />

Total 1.36 1471 1.48 1555 1.66 1564 2.15 1678<br />

*”G<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners” include the lic<strong>en</strong>sed and the unlic<strong>en</strong>sed g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners<br />

**for whom no place of curative care has be<strong>en</strong> registered<br />

1.4.2.3 Inactivity in the curative sector for the unlic<strong>en</strong>sed and the lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs: analysis<br />

per linguistic community (CIPMP database)<br />

Eight perc<strong>en</strong>t (8%) of the GPs who qualified betwe<strong>en</strong> 1988 and 1990 in the Fr<strong>en</strong>chspeaking<br />

Community were inactive in the curative sector in 1994 (i.e. four to six years<br />

later) (table 6). This inactivity rate increased with 12% in 2005 for the GPs qualified<br />

betwe<strong>en</strong> 1999 and 2001 in the Fr<strong>en</strong>ch-speaking Community. This increase was ev<strong>en</strong><br />

more noticeable in the Dutch-speaking community: 16% in 1994, climbing to 25% in<br />

2005.<br />

1.4.2.4 Inactivity in the curative sector for the specialists: analysis per linguistic<br />

community (CIPMP database)<br />

The inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tages of the specialists were always much lower than those of the<br />

g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners, throughout the various cohorts (table 6). In 2005, 2.2% of the<br />

specialists were inactive in the curative sector against 19.2% of the GPs. We also notice<br />

that the number of GPs increased compared to the specialists, which might partly<br />

explain the noticeable increase of inactivity in the curative sector among GPs from<br />

differ<strong>en</strong>t the cohorts.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!