Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
G<strong>en</strong>eral<br />
practitioners<br />
*<br />
Specialists<br />
KCE Reports 90 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion 13<br />
Table 5: Inactivity among unlic<strong>en</strong>sed and lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs and specialists four to<br />
six years after their degree as MD: perc<strong>en</strong>tages and numbers by g<strong>en</strong>der. A<br />
study of four groups qualified as MD betwe<strong>en</strong> 1988 and 2001, in Belgium<br />
(CIPMP database, 2007)<br />
Cohorts<br />
Qualified as MD in Qualified as MD Qualified as MD in Qualified as MD in<br />
88, 89, 90<br />
% inactive in<br />
in 93, 94, 95<br />
96, 97, 98 99, 2000, 01<br />
the curative<br />
% inactive in<br />
% Inactive in<br />
% inactive in<br />
sector** in total the curative total the curative total the curative total<br />
1994 number sector in 1999 nber sector in 2002 nber sector in 2005 nber<br />
Wome<br />
n 17.57 444 14.79 311 25.15 489 21.44 709<br />
M<strong>en</strong> 8.40 500 11.97 259 15.41 318 15.42 428<br />
Total<br />
Wome<br />
12.7 944 13.51 570 21.31 807 19.2 1137<br />
n 1.89 476 2.26 619 1.84 761 2.45 856<br />
M<strong>en</strong> 1.11 995 0.96 936 1.49 803 1.82 822<br />
Total 1.36 1471 1.48 1555 1.66 1564 2.15 1678<br />
*”G<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners” include the lic<strong>en</strong>sed and the unlic<strong>en</strong>sed g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners<br />
**for whom no place of curative care has be<strong>en</strong> registered<br />
1.4.2.3 Inactivity in the curative sector for the unlic<strong>en</strong>sed and the lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs: analysis<br />
per linguistic community (CIPMP database)<br />
Eight perc<strong>en</strong>t (8%) of the GPs who qualified betwe<strong>en</strong> 1988 and 1990 in the Fr<strong>en</strong>chspeaking<br />
Community were inactive in the curative sector in 1994 (i.e. four to six years<br />
later) (table 6). This inactivity rate increased with 12% in 2005 for the GPs qualified<br />
betwe<strong>en</strong> 1999 and 2001 in the Fr<strong>en</strong>ch-speaking Community. This increase was ev<strong>en</strong><br />
more noticeable in the Dutch-speaking community: 16% in 1994, climbing to 25% in<br />
2005.<br />
1.4.2.4 Inactivity in the curative sector for the specialists: analysis per linguistic<br />
community (CIPMP database)<br />
The inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tages of the specialists were always much lower than those of the<br />
g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners, throughout the various cohorts (table 6). In 2005, 2.2% of the<br />
specialists were inactive in the curative sector against 19.2% of the GPs. We also notice<br />
that the number of GPs increased compared to the specialists, which might partly<br />
explain the noticeable increase of inactivity in the curative sector among GPs from<br />
differ<strong>en</strong>t the cohorts.