10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Age group<br />

12 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />

1.4.1.6 Inactivity in the curative sector for the lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs: annual growth rates by<br />

linguistic community (INAMI/RIZIV database)<br />

Yearly<br />

growth<br />

The annual growth rate of inactivity was stratified by linguistic community (table 4<br />

below). Overall, the differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> the communities were small. However,<br />

among the youngest age group, the increase of inactivity was much more important in<br />

the Fr<strong>en</strong>ch-speaking (annual growth rate of 8.5%) than in the Dutch-speaking part<br />

(1.1%). In the other age groups, the growth rate was slightly more important for the<br />

Dutch-speaking GPs compared to the Fr<strong>en</strong>ch-speaking GPs but these differ<strong>en</strong>ces were<br />

not statistically significant, apart for the age group 40-49 and 60-69 (p-value=0.02).<br />

Table 4: Lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs: annual growth rate of the inactivity in the curative<br />

sector under AMI by age group and linguistic community, 1995-2005.<br />

Source: INAMI/RIZIV database, Belgium, 2007<br />

rate FR 95% CI<br />

Yearly<br />

growth rate<br />

NL 95% CI<br />

p-value<br />

Differ<strong>en</strong>ce<br />

north/south<br />

25 – 29 0.085 (0.01, 0.16) * 0.011 (-0.03, 0.05) 0.04<br />

30 – 39 0.081 (0.06, 0.10) *** 0.093 (0.08, 0.11) *** 0.17<br />

40 – 49 0.117 (0.10, 0.13) *** 0.141 (0.12, 0.16) *** 0.02<br />

50 – 59 0.085 (0.06, 0.11) *** 0.096 (0.07, 0.12) *** 0.28<br />

60 – 69 0.013 (-0.01, 0.04) 0.051 (0.03, 0.08) *** 0.02<br />

Source: INAMI/RIZIV (file of profiles), 2007 a beta coeffici<strong>en</strong>t of the binomial regression:<br />

inactivity rate at time t = a + b year; ***significant at 0.001; ** at 0.01; * at 0.05;<br />

An analysis has be<strong>en</strong> carried out In order to assess if the situation is differ<strong>en</strong>t betwe<strong>en</strong><br />

GPs and the specialists, (see figures 5 and 6 and table 8 in app<strong>en</strong>dix 1.9)<br />

1.4.2 CIPMP DATABASE: Inactivity 4 to 6 years AND 9 to 11 years after the<br />

degree as Medical Doctor<br />

1.4.2.1 Inactivity in the curative sector for the non lic<strong>en</strong>sed and the lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs:<br />

analysis per g<strong>en</strong>der (CIPMP database)<br />

The total number of young qualified GPs (unlic<strong>en</strong>sed or lic<strong>en</strong>sed) increased from 1988<br />

to 2001 (from 944 betwe<strong>en</strong> 1998 and 1990 to 1137 betwe<strong>en</strong> 1999 and 2001). However,<br />

the proportion being inactive in the curative sector 4 to 6 years after their degree as<br />

MD increased too (from 12.7% in 1994 to 19.2% in 2005) (table 5 below). Female GPs<br />

had higher inactivity proportions than male GPs throughout the period but the<br />

proportion of m<strong>en</strong> inactive in the curative sector nearly doubled during the same<br />

period.<br />

1.4.2.2 Inactivity in the curative sector for the specialists: analysis per g<strong>en</strong>der (CIPMP<br />

database)<br />

Compared to the GPs, the inactivity in the curative sector among specialists was less<br />

important 4 to 6 years after their degree as specialists (from 1.36% in 1994 to 2.15% in<br />

2005) and much more stable during the observed years (table 5). The differ<strong>en</strong>ce<br />

betwe<strong>en</strong> g<strong>en</strong>ders for the specialists is slighter than among GPs (1 or 2% only).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!