10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />

The total lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs increased throughout the years (from 12 292 in 1995 to 14 170<br />

in 2005) (table 2) as well as the proportion of GPs who were inactive in the curative<br />

care. The inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage was defined as the GPs having 0 INAMI acts during the<br />

year (group nr 19 in app<strong>en</strong>dix 1.8). This perc<strong>en</strong>tage increased for all age groups<br />

throughout the period considered (from 4% in 1995 to 12% in 2005 globally). More<br />

precisely, the increase was more noticeable for the age groups above 30 years. Indeed,<br />

betwe<strong>en</strong> 1995 and 2005, the inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage for the age group betwe<strong>en</strong> 30 and 39<br />

years old increased from 4% in 1995 to 11% in 2005, while it only increased from 6% in<br />

1995 to 9% in 2005 for the age group betwe<strong>en</strong> 25 and 29 years.<br />

The small practices were defined as GPs who provide betwe<strong>en</strong> 1 and 1249 acts during<br />

the observed year. The small practice perc<strong>en</strong>tages increased as well as the inactivity<br />

perc<strong>en</strong>tage in the age groups from 25 to 39 years old.<br />

Table 2: Inactivity or small practices in the curative sector for lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs :<br />

numbers and perc<strong>en</strong>tages among pot<strong>en</strong>tially available GPs, by age group in<br />

1995, 2000 and 2005. (Source: INAMI/RIZIV database, Belgium, 2007)<br />

Age<br />

groups<br />

% inactive<br />

in curative<br />

1995<br />

Small<br />

% inactive in<br />

Year<br />

2000<br />

Small<br />

% inactive<br />

in curative<br />

2005<br />

Small<br />

care under practice Total curative care practice Total care under practice Total<br />

AMI* perc<strong>en</strong>tage** GP*** under AMI* perc<strong>en</strong>tage** GP AMI* perc<strong>en</strong>tage** GP<br />

25 - 29 6.0 41.1 470 7.3 42.3 634 8.9 50.9 440<br />

30 - 39 3.9 15.3 4307 9.5 15.8 2951 11.0 20.8 2696<br />

40 - 49 2.6 11.0 4496 6.9 10.7 5413 11.4 12.9 4413<br />

50 - 59 2.6 10.6 1454 4.4 10.5 2589 7.4 11.7 4359<br />

60 - 69 6.4 19.1 1126 10.3 17.9 1185 10.8 18.1 1265<br />

70+ 25.1 44.6 439 36.2 34.9 702 43.5 30.3 997<br />

total 4.3 15.6 12292 8.8 15.2 13474 12.2 16.9 14170<br />

Source: INAMI/RIZIV (file of profiles), 2007<br />

*The inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage is computed for MDs who do not provide any INAMI act during the<br />

observed year (group nr 19 in app<strong>en</strong>dix 1.8).<br />

** The small practice perc<strong>en</strong>tage concerns MDs who provide betwe<strong>en</strong> 1 and 1249 acts during the<br />

observed year.<br />

***The total GP concern the lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs who are pot<strong>en</strong>tially available (those called “active”, i.e.<br />

not being dead, and not known as being out of practice, retired, living abroad, nor forbidd<strong>en</strong> of<br />

practice) group nr 16 in app<strong>en</strong>dix 1.8<br />

****Differ<strong>en</strong>ce betwe<strong>en</strong> the totals of table 5 and the totals of table 3 due to calculation on 2<br />

differ<strong>en</strong>t INAMI files (max loss/years: 9 persons).<br />

1.4.1.3 Inactivity or small practice in the curative sector for lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs under AMI:<br />

analysis by g<strong>en</strong>der (INAMI/RIZIV database)<br />

Figures 1 and 2 (see app<strong>en</strong>dix 1.9) detail the table 2 (above) for the perc<strong>en</strong>tages of GPs<br />

who are inactive in the curative sector, by g<strong>en</strong>der.<br />

Figure 1 clearly shows that the inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage increased gradually for all age<br />

groups for the female GPs. However, the increase was less pronounced for the younger<br />

age groups (from 5.6% in 1995 to 10% in 2005) compared to the other age groups.<br />

The global inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage for the m<strong>en</strong> also increased for all age groups (figure 2)<br />

but to a lesser ext<strong>en</strong>t, compared to the global inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage of the wom<strong>en</strong><br />

(respectively 6% in 1995 to 15% in 2005 for the wom<strong>en</strong> versus 4% in 1995 to 11% in<br />

2005 for the m<strong>en</strong>).<br />

The inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage for the youngest age groups remained stable (from 6.5% in<br />

1995 to 6% in 2005) compared to the inactivity perc<strong>en</strong>tage of wom<strong>en</strong> for the same age<br />

groups (from 5.6% in 1995 to 10% in 2005). The strong variations among this youngest<br />

age group can be explained by the small size of this group (137 m<strong>en</strong> in 2005).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!