Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />
The first analysis computed the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of MDs who were inactive in the curative sector 4 to 6<br />
years after their graduation as MD (see table below).<br />
D<strong>en</strong>ominator Numerator<br />
Year of MD degree: Inactive in the curative sector in:<br />
Betwe<strong>en</strong> 1988 and 1990 1994<br />
Betwe<strong>en</strong> 1993 and 1995 1999<br />
Betwe<strong>en</strong> 1996 and 1998 2002<br />
Betwe<strong>en</strong> 1999 and 2001 2005<br />
The second perc<strong>en</strong>tage was the perc<strong>en</strong>tage of MDs (lic<strong>en</strong>sed and unlic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs for<br />
INAMI/RIZIV) who are inactive in the curative sector 9 to 11 years after their degree as<br />
MD if they had at least one place of curative care 5 years after obtaining such a degree<br />
(=d<strong>en</strong>ominator).<br />
The following table summarizes these analyses:<br />
D<strong>en</strong>ominator Numerator<br />
Year of MD degree Having at least one place of Inactive in the curative sector in:<br />
curative care in:<br />
Betwe<strong>en</strong> 1988 and 1990 1994 1999<br />
betwe<strong>en</strong> 1993 and 1995 1999 2005<br />
Those perc<strong>en</strong>tages have be<strong>en</strong> computed by linguistic community and g<strong>en</strong>der and have<br />
th<strong>en</strong> be<strong>en</strong> compared to those of specialists. We excluded the MDs who died in the<br />
meantime and those having worked in Belgium with a legal lic<strong>en</strong>se but who left Belgium<br />
afterwards.<br />
The table below summarizes the analyses conducted in both databases.<br />
Database Type of study Studied Numerator D<strong>en</strong>ominator<br />
INAMI/RIZIV Repeated crosssectional<br />
study<br />
betwe<strong>en</strong> 1995,<br />
2000 and 2005<br />
CIPMP Cohort studies (4<br />
to 6 years and 9<br />
to 11 years after<br />
their degree as<br />
MD): follow-ups<br />
of those<br />
graduating<br />
betwe<strong>en</strong>:<br />
1988-1990, 1993-<br />
1995, 1996-1998,<br />
1999-2001<br />
1.4 RESULTS<br />
1.4.1 INAMI/RIZIV DATABASE<br />
questions<br />
Perc<strong>en</strong>tage of<br />
MDs inactive in<br />
the curative<br />
sector under the<br />
AMI in 1995,<br />
2000 and 2005<br />
and small practice<br />
perc<strong>en</strong>tage<br />
Evolution of the<br />
inactivity of MDs<br />
in the curative<br />
sector among<br />
those who got<br />
their degree as<br />
MD at time t0.<br />
MDs having<br />
0 INAMI acts or<br />
betwe<strong>en</strong> 1 and 1249<br />
acts a year<br />
First perc<strong>en</strong>tage :<br />
MDs who are inactive<br />
in the curative sector<br />
4 to 6 years after<br />
their degree as MD<br />
Second perc<strong>en</strong>tage:<br />
MDs who are inactive<br />
in the curative sector<br />
9 to 11 years after<br />
their degree as MD<br />
Lic<strong>en</strong>sed or<br />
unlic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs<br />
according to the<br />
Health insurance,<br />
with a situation code<br />
1(active) (+<br />
specialists)<br />
Cohorts of medical<br />
stud<strong>en</strong>ts who got<br />
their degree as MD<br />
at time t0<br />
MDs who had at<br />
least one curative<br />
activity 4 to 6 years<br />
after their degree as<br />
MD<br />
In 1995, 16714 GPs (including GPs in training) were registered in the INAMI/RIZIV (see<br />
table 1 below). A group of 16515 so-called “active” g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners remained<br />
wh<strong>en</strong> excluding the GPs known as out of practice, retired, living abroad or forbidd<strong>en</strong> of<br />
practice. This number climbed to 18217 in 2005. The proportions of types of g<strong>en</strong>eral<br />
practitioners (the unlic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs, the lic<strong>en</strong>sed GPs and the GPs in training) out of the<br />
total “active” g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners increased slightly throughout the years. The rather