Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

More documents

Recommendations

Info

112 Making General Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Retention KCE Reports 90 Table 21: Criteria of policy choice: discrete choice conditional logit coefficients (n=102) Policy criteria Teaching Coefficient 95% CI P value Attractiveness GP 0.72 (0.39-1.05)
KCE Reports 90 Making General Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Retention 113 stakeholder survey but it provides a rather low power to detect between-groups differences. Socio-demographic (sex and age group) as well as power variables had – with very few exceptions- no contribution at all to scoring or ranking differences. For gender, this is mainly due to the fact that most non-GP stakeholders are men although we had a good balance of men and women for GPs (respectively 19 and 12). Language and stakeholder groups had slightly more influences: the description focuses thus on these last two variables. 6.7.5.1 Teaching policies Very few significant associations were found for those most popular policies. GPs stakeholders were slightly less keen on the policy to improve GP approach in the curriculum. Dutch-speaking stakeholders were more likely (OR=2.88, p=0.01) to support such policy than French-speaking stakeholders. There were few differences for the compulsory clerkship for all medical students: the stakeholders with a medical degree were less favorable to this option. 6.7.5.2 Financing policies For the most popular policies related to financing (capitation and target payment), there were broadly no significant differences between groups. Within-group disagreement seemed as high as between-disagreement: the model financing policy was indeed supported by 29% of the sample only. Financing remains a very controversial topic between and within stakeholder groups, independently of the type of group (GPs or policy makers or interest groups). However, the GPs were more positive for capitation than the other stakeholders groups (OR=2.49, p=0.09). For the other policies, the Dutch-speaking stakeholders were more supportive of wage payment than the French-speaking stakeholders (OR=3.54, p
Page 1 and 2:
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskr
Page 3 and 4:
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskr
Page 5:
Layout : Van Moer Wim Brussel, 27 o
Page 8 and 9:
ii Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekking
Page 10 and 11:
iv Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekking
Page 12 and 13:
vi Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekking
Page 14 and 15:
viii Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekki
Page 16 and 17:
2 Making General Practice Attractiv
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
10 Making General Practice Attracti
Page 26 and 27:
Age group 12 Making General Practic
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Total 7th year students inscribed r
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77: 62 Making General Practice Attracti
Page 114 and 115: 100 Making General Practice Attract
Page 150 and 151: Wettelijk depot : D/2008/10.273/63
Page 152 and 153: 38. Baarmoederhalskankerscreening e
show all

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?