Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
108 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />
6.6.4 Summary: new policies according to the stakeholders<br />
Some major themes emerged in the new policies m<strong>en</strong>tioned by the stakeholders:<br />
1. The society is changing. The pati<strong>en</strong>t should be educated to use properly<br />
the health care system. The young GPs privilege their private life to a<br />
career and are not ready to accept any pati<strong>en</strong>t’s will. The curr<strong>en</strong>t<br />
t<strong>en</strong>d<strong>en</strong>cy to work in group practices seems a solution for most problems<br />
including duty, continuity and training.<br />
2. Medicine is changing with a growing bulk of information. This implies a<br />
modification of the lectures, of the continuous medical education and of<br />
the selection of the information by the GP to decrease the workload. The<br />
organization of the profession should be under the responsibility of the<br />
GPs themselves: the promotion of some spots to install a practice, the<br />
follow-up of the duty service, the links with hospitals, specialists and other<br />
health care professionals from the first line.<br />
3. The GP’s role in the health care system is crucial: he knows best the<br />
pati<strong>en</strong>t. However, the increasing need for sci<strong>en</strong>tific knowledge urges for a<br />
multidisciplinary approach (during training, during practice and in all<br />
aspects of collaboration).<br />
4. Money is not ess<strong>en</strong>tial although it is necessary and it will help to<br />
overcome some great difficulties (duty, computing). Other inc<strong>en</strong>tives are<br />
more important e.g., social status, maternity leaves, help in socially<br />
deprived zones.<br />
6.7 WHY DO THE STAKEHOLDERS PREFER SOME POLICIES?<br />
6.7.1 Introduction<br />
In the previous part, policies were prioritized according to their scores or ranks.<br />
However, this does not explain why some policies are preferred or discarded. Ev<strong>en</strong> if<br />
some policies got a dec<strong>en</strong>t score, none reached a majority as the first-preferred policy:<br />
the highest mean rank was 1.81 for the integration of a GPs’ perspective into the master<br />
courses (teaching topic) and 1. 91 for the support of an evolving career (work-life<br />
topic). Conversely, very popular policies being today considered or having be<strong>en</strong> rec<strong>en</strong>tly<br />
implem<strong>en</strong>ted (such as the increase of the consultation fees) received a low support<br />
(mean rank of 2.69).<br />
If one wishes to implem<strong>en</strong>t a policy, it is important to anticipate why some policies are<br />
either preferred or rejected. Understanding the hurdles to be faced is a first step into<br />
figuring out how to take them seriously into account or to bypass them. There are two<br />
ways of doing that: considering policy criteria and stakeholders characteristics.<br />
First, health policy decision making dep<strong>en</strong>ds on how well these policies meet differ<strong>en</strong>t<br />
values, that we called “the criteria”. According to previous researches on health care 198<br />
, 204 , 207<br />
, the choice of a particular policy dep<strong>en</strong>ds on how well it fulfils the values that a<br />
stakeholder has in mind. In this research the policies to improve GP’s attraction,<br />
recruitm<strong>en</strong>t and ret<strong>en</strong>tion were assessed on 4 criteria (see method). The first question<br />
to ask is therefore “What is the contribution of these criteria to the stakeholder’s<br />
choice?”<br />
Second, another t<strong>en</strong>et of this research is that differ<strong>en</strong>t policies can command varying<br />
support from differ<strong>en</strong>t groups, because groups do not have the same objectives, do not<br />
face the same accountability rules and, finally, do not share the same socialization and<br />
decision-making opportunities. For example, GPs may feel much more responsible for<br />
their pati<strong>en</strong>t while policy-makers may feel much more liable for the society perspective.<br />
But there are many characteristics that matter. Indeed, a stakeholder belongs to<br />
differ<strong>en</strong>t interest groups, to differ<strong>en</strong>t language communities, he may have be<strong>en</strong> trained<br />
as a physician or not, he may work for an organisation having high or low power on the<br />
issue. Stakeholders may have differ<strong>en</strong>t understanding of the issues and may have, as an