10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

KCE Reports 90 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion 105<br />

Regarding the delegation of the administrative activities, it seems more than necessary<br />

to decrease them to give more time to GPs to perform medicine. However, the<br />

interviewees think it would be better to decrease the work than to add help.<br />

One of the conditions behind the improvem<strong>en</strong>t of the role of the GP in the<br />

multidisciplinary team is the fact that it should be paid. Furthermore, the time for the<br />

meetings and their conditions (face-to-face, phone or email) should also be clear.<br />

Table 19: Preferred health organization policies: mean ranks and scores (n=102)<br />

Most preferred health organization policy<br />

Mean<br />

rank<br />

Mean<br />

score<br />

1. GPs working together 1.91 5.68<br />

2. Delegation of administrative activities 2.03 5.40<br />

3. Improvem<strong>en</strong>t of the role of the GP in the multidisciplinary team 2.04 5.54<br />

4. Delegation of specific clinical tasks to other health professions 2.12 4.82<br />

5. Limitation of the excessive use of the second line 2.19 5.09<br />

6. GPs sharing a common infrastructure 2.30 5.50<br />

7. Creation of a nurse-assistant master<br />

2.60 5.01<br />

8. Inc<strong>en</strong>tives for working in underserved areas 2.66 5.27<br />

9. Removal of the Numerus Clausus 3.39 3.89<br />

10. Support of a local resource ag<strong>en</strong>cy for GPs 4.00 4.27<br />

Some respond<strong>en</strong>ts are positive about the most discarded policy (to support a local<br />

resource ag<strong>en</strong>cy for GPs) but negative comm<strong>en</strong>ts are more important and concern the<br />

administrative characteristics and burd<strong>en</strong>s of these ag<strong>en</strong>cies. The suggestions go in the<br />

way of reinforcing the existing structures, for example the GPs’ circles, to perform this<br />

mission.<br />

Fostering GPs to work together and improving its role in the multidisciplinary team are<br />

two major strategies according to the 4 criteria (figure 5). Limiting the use of the 2 nd<br />

line is a good strategy for improving attraction and cost-b<strong>en</strong>efit: but it is poorly<br />

acceptable by the other health professions and performs badly regarding accessibility.<br />

Scrapping the numerus clausus and creating local resource ag<strong>en</strong>cies were mostly two<br />

ineffective strategies on the four criteria (figure 6). The delegation of either clinical<br />

tasks or administrative tasks as well as the organization of a new master course for<br />

nurse-assistants had mixed results: although their effect on attraction would be good,<br />

they were judged as a poor cost-b<strong>en</strong>efit measure.<br />

Figure 5: Criteria of organisation policies: radar by policy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!