10.08.2013 Views

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

Huisartsgeneeskunde: aantrekkingskracht en beroepstrouw ... - Lirias

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92 Making G<strong>en</strong>eral Practice Attractive: Encouraging GP attraction and Ret<strong>en</strong>tion KCE Reports 90<br />

6.3.4 Developm<strong>en</strong>t of policy criteria<br />

o To diversify the remuneration modalities of the g<strong>en</strong>eral<br />

practice by remunerating the realization of objectives or the<br />

quality of the taking care of the pati<strong>en</strong>t<br />

• Work organization and work-life balance policies (5 policies)<br />

o To allow or to <strong>en</strong>courage an evolving career associating<br />

ambulatory curative medicine and other activities like<br />

research, teaching, public health, hospitals, …<br />

o Not to p<strong>en</strong>alize the work of g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioners with regular<br />

working hours or who are working part-time (for example, by<br />

modulating the accreditation rules)<br />

o To organize provincial groups of professional GPs responsible<br />

in the replacem<strong>en</strong>t<br />

o To finance the GPs for their accreditation activities during the<br />

week and the day<br />

o To replace the individual duty obligation by a professional<br />

service like “SOS médecins” and/or secured duty places<br />

• Health care organization policies (10 policies).<br />

o To remove the Numerus Clausus<br />

o To t<strong>en</strong>d towards a more equitable geographical distribution,<br />

by improving the inc<strong>en</strong>tives to work in less covered areas.<br />

o To support the creation of local ag<strong>en</strong>cies in charge of<br />

promoting the attractiv<strong>en</strong>ess and the ret<strong>en</strong>tion of the g<strong>en</strong>eral<br />

practitioners according to the local needs (for example: in<br />

partnership with the Circles)<br />

o To create another training of nurses in advanced practice to<br />

back the g<strong>en</strong>eral practitioner (for example, in the follow-up of<br />

the chronically ill pati<strong>en</strong>ts)<br />

o To <strong>en</strong>courage the delegation of some clinical tasks to other<br />

existing health professions (nurses, physiotherapists…)<br />

o To <strong>en</strong>courage the delegation of some social, tax activities,<br />

administrative or computer tasks to administrative staff<br />

o To <strong>en</strong>courage the GPs to have a common infrastructure or a<br />

common secretariat<br />

o To <strong>en</strong>courage the GPs to work together (by having the same<br />

pati<strong>en</strong>ts or not)<br />

o To financially discourage the excessive or the premature<br />

recourse of the second line<br />

o To reinforce the role of the GPs in the multi-field dialogue.<br />

The criteria are the objectives the decision-maker wishes to complete through the<br />

policies. These criteria are the dim<strong>en</strong>sions on which the options are to be assessed.<br />

Several sources of information helped to id<strong>en</strong>tify those criteria:<br />

• the literature review carried out in the first part of the study,<br />

• the criteria suggested by the GPs themselves as collected in the<br />

qualitative interviews m<strong>en</strong>tioned in part 5,<br />

• the criteria used in previous priority settings in the health sector<br />

, 206 , 207 , 208 , 209 198 , 199<br />

or in multi-criteria analysis .<br />

204 , 205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!