10.08.2013 Views

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ii non-<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong> <strong>KCE</strong> reports 119C<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Executive summary<br />

This study aims to provide a systematic review of the scientific literature on <strong>diagnosis</strong>,<br />

prognosis <strong>and</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> of acute <strong>and</strong> chronic non-<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>. The objective is to<br />

propose evidence-based key messages to diagnose <strong>and</strong> to treat adults who suffer from<br />

non-<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>.<br />

Neck <strong>pain</strong> is a wide entity which includes e.g. non-<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong><br />

associated disorders. Symptoms vary with physical activity <strong>and</strong> over time. Each form of<br />

acute, subacute or chronic <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>, where no abnormal anatomic structure as cause<br />

of <strong>pain</strong> can be identified, is non-<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>. In the literature, no generally<br />

accepted definition exists for the concept acute, sub-acute or chronic.<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

The literature search covered the period from 1998 to 2008 <strong>and</strong> included (systematic)<br />

reviews, meta-analyses, guidelines, RCTs <strong>and</strong> clinical trials.<br />

The researchers screened the scientific literature in Medline, Embase, Cochrane <strong>and</strong><br />

Pedro databases. Moreover, existing guidelines were searched in <strong>specific</strong> databases. All<br />

papers were screened by a team of two reviewers. A multidisciplinary panel of experts<br />

joined the research team to define the evidence level of the conclusions using the<br />

“GRADE” system:<br />

• Grade A (high level of evidence): RCTs without important limitations or<br />

overwhelming evidence from observational studies;<br />

• Grade B (moderate level of evidence): RCTs with important limitations<br />

(inconsistent indirect, or imprecise results; methodological flaws) or<br />

exceptionally strong evidence from observational studies;<br />

• Grade C (low level of evidence): Lower level of evidence.<br />

Finally, the conclusions of this review were compared to those of two high quality<br />

guidelines identified during the search.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!