10.08.2013 Views

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Karjalainen K,<br />

Malmivaara A, van<br />

Tulder M, Roine<br />

R, Jauhiainen M,<br />

Hurri H, Koes B:<br />

Multidisciplinary<br />

biopsychosocial<br />

rehabilitation for<br />

<strong>neck</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />

shoulder <strong>pain</strong><br />

among working<br />

age adults.<br />

Cochrane<br />

Database Syst<br />

Rev<br />

2003(2):CD00219<br />

4.<br />

Kay, T. M., A.<br />

Gross, et al.<br />

"Exercises for<br />

mechanical <strong>neck</strong><br />

disorders<br />

(Cochrane<br />

Review) [with<br />

consumer<br />

summary]."<br />

46 <strong>Non</strong>-Specific Neck Pain: <strong>diagnosis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 119<br />

medium (6) 2003 To determine the<br />

effectiveness of<br />

multidisciplinary<br />

biopsychosocial<br />

rehabilitation for<br />

<strong>neck</strong> <strong>and</strong> shoulder<br />

<strong>pain</strong> among working<br />

age adults.<br />

medium (6) 2005 To assess the effect of<br />

exercise therapy on<br />

<strong>pain</strong> relief,patient<br />

satisfaction <strong>and</strong><br />

global perceived<br />

effect <strong>and</strong> function.<br />

Where appropriate<br />

the influence of<br />

methodological<br />

quality, duration of<br />

the disorder,<br />

subtypes of <strong>neck</strong><br />

disorder <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>treatment</strong> effect.<br />

1. Ekberg, 1994<br />

2. Jensen, 1995<br />

1. Allison, 2002 2. Brodin, 1984, 1985<br />

3. Bronfort, 2001 4. Fitz‐Ritson, 1995<br />

5. Gam, 1998 6. Geibel, 1997<br />

7. Goldie, 1970 8. Hagberg, 2000<br />

9. Hanten, 2000 10. Hoving, 2001a,b<br />

11. Jordan, 1996, 1998 12. Jull, 2002<br />

13. Karlberg, 1996<br />

14. Koes, 1991, 1991a,1992a,b,c,d,e, 1993<br />

15. Kogstad, 2002 16. Levoska, 1993<br />

17. Lundblad, 1999 18. McKinney, 1989, 1998<br />

19. Mealy, 1986 20. Pennie, 1990<br />

21. Persson, 2001 22. Provinciali, 1996<br />

23. R<strong>and</strong>lov, 1998 24. Revel, 1994<br />

25. Rosenfeld, 2000 26. Soderlund, 2000, 2001<br />

27. Taimela, 2000 28. Takala, 1994<br />

29. Vasseljen, 1995 30. Waling, 2002<br />

31. Ylinen, 2003<br />

nov/02 Patients with<br />

<strong>neck</strong> or shoulder<br />

<strong>pain</strong> (no<br />

distinction)<br />

march/<br />

2004<br />

multidisciplinar traditional sick leave, <strong>pain</strong>,<br />

y rehabilitation <strong>treatment</strong> health‐related<br />

vs none: (medication, behavior, working<br />

physio, rest <strong>and</strong> conditions. 2 years<br />

active<br />

multidisciplinar<br />

y rehabilitation<br />

(physical<br />

training +<br />

education+info<br />

rmation+social<br />

interaction +<br />

work place<br />

visit).<br />

(multidisciplina<br />

ry<br />

rehabilitation<br />

with a<br />

psychologist<br />

working with<br />

patients,<br />

Multidisciplinar<br />

y rehabilitation<br />

with a<br />

psychologist<br />

coaching the<br />

team<br />

sick leave follow‐up<br />

adults >18years exercises (e.g.<br />

)<br />

other therapies <strong>pain</strong> , measures of<br />

or older, who <strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> or no<br />

function/disability,<br />

suffered from exercises, <strong>treatment</strong>(other patient satisfaction,<br />

acute (less than shoulder therapies e.g. global perceived<br />

30 days), exercises, neural effect.<br />

subacute (30 to active <strong>treatment</strong>,<br />

90 days) or exercises, anagesic,<br />

chronic (longer stretching, manual traction,<br />

than 90 days) strengthening, mobilisation,<br />

<strong>neck</strong> disorders. postural, electrical<br />

MND:<br />

functional, eye‐ stimulation,<br />

mechanical <strong>neck</strong> fixation, education, …<br />

disorders, proprioception applied alone or<br />

including WAD I‐ exercises, in cominiation)<br />

II, myofascial home<br />

<strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />

degenerative<br />

changes<br />

NDH: Neck<br />

disorders with<br />

headache<br />

NDR: Neck<br />

disorders with<br />

radicular<br />

findings<br />

exercises)<br />

Favouring <strong>treatment</strong><br />

Exercise vs control effect on <strong>pain</strong>:<br />

‐ McKinney, 1989 ‐0,77[‐1,20,‐0,35]<br />

‐ Jull, 2002 ‐0,75[‐1,17,‐0,34]<br />

‐ Jull, 2002 (45w follow‐up) ‐0,59[‐1,0,‐0,18]<br />

‐ Goldie, 1970 (3wfollow‐up) 0,42[0,21‐0,8]<br />

‐ Ylinen, 2003(52w<strong>treatment</strong>)0,52[0,37‐0,73]<br />

Exercise vs control effect on function:<br />

‐ Revel, 1994 (8w<strong>treatment</strong>+2wfollow‐up)<br />

0,55[0,33‐0,89]<br />

NNT <strong>and</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> advantage: <strong>pain</strong> relief with multimodal<br />

care.<br />

NNT Advantage%<br />

‐ Jull, 2002 5 40,8<br />

‐ Rosenfield, 2000 5 38<br />

‐ Skargren, 1997, 1998 4 26,1<br />

Based on the two trials (low<br />

methodological quality) it could not be<br />

shown that multidisciplinary<br />

rehabilitation is better than usual care.<br />

Exercise, both stretching <strong>and</strong>/or<br />

strengthening (of the cervical or shoulder<br />

region) <strong>and</strong> vertigo/eye‐fixation<br />

exercises, are more benneficial than no<br />

<strong>treatment</strong>.<br />

A multimodal care approach of exercise<br />

combined with mobilisations or<br />

manipulations for subacute <strong>and</strong> chronic<br />

MND with or without headache, reduced<br />

<strong>pain</strong>, improved function, <strong>and</strong> high global<br />

perceived effect in the short <strong>and</strong> long<br />

term.<br />

It is unclear what the relative benefit of<br />

exxercises therapy is when compared to<br />

other <strong>treatment</strong>s. the relative benefit of<br />

different exercise approaches is unclear.<br />

It was not possible to determine which<br />

technique or dosage was more beneficial<br />

or if certain subgroups benefit more from<br />

one form of care than another.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!