Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE
Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE
Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Karjalainen K,<br />
Malmivaara A, van<br />
Tulder M, Roine<br />
R, Jauhiainen M,<br />
Hurri H, Koes B:<br />
Multidisciplinary<br />
biopsychosocial<br />
rehabilitation for<br />
<strong>neck</strong> <strong>and</strong><br />
shoulder <strong>pain</strong><br />
among working<br />
age adults.<br />
Cochrane<br />
Database Syst<br />
Rev<br />
2003(2):CD00219<br />
4.<br />
Kay, T. M., A.<br />
Gross, et al.<br />
"Exercises for<br />
mechanical <strong>neck</strong><br />
disorders<br />
(Cochrane<br />
Review) [with<br />
consumer<br />
summary]."<br />
46 <strong>Non</strong>-Specific Neck Pain: <strong>diagnosis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 119<br />
medium (6) 2003 To determine the<br />
effectiveness of<br />
multidisciplinary<br />
biopsychosocial<br />
rehabilitation for<br />
<strong>neck</strong> <strong>and</strong> shoulder<br />
<strong>pain</strong> among working<br />
age adults.<br />
medium (6) 2005 To assess the effect of<br />
exercise therapy on<br />
<strong>pain</strong> relief,patient<br />
satisfaction <strong>and</strong><br />
global perceived<br />
effect <strong>and</strong> function.<br />
Where appropriate<br />
the influence of<br />
methodological<br />
quality, duration of<br />
the disorder,<br />
subtypes of <strong>neck</strong><br />
disorder <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>treatment</strong> effect.<br />
1. Ekberg, 1994<br />
2. Jensen, 1995<br />
1. Allison, 2002 2. Brodin, 1984, 1985<br />
3. Bronfort, 2001 4. Fitz‐Ritson, 1995<br />
5. Gam, 1998 6. Geibel, 1997<br />
7. Goldie, 1970 8. Hagberg, 2000<br />
9. Hanten, 2000 10. Hoving, 2001a,b<br />
11. Jordan, 1996, 1998 12. Jull, 2002<br />
13. Karlberg, 1996<br />
14. Koes, 1991, 1991a,1992a,b,c,d,e, 1993<br />
15. Kogstad, 2002 16. Levoska, 1993<br />
17. Lundblad, 1999 18. McKinney, 1989, 1998<br />
19. Mealy, 1986 20. Pennie, 1990<br />
21. Persson, 2001 22. Provinciali, 1996<br />
23. R<strong>and</strong>lov, 1998 24. Revel, 1994<br />
25. Rosenfeld, 2000 26. Soderlund, 2000, 2001<br />
27. Taimela, 2000 28. Takala, 1994<br />
29. Vasseljen, 1995 30. Waling, 2002<br />
31. Ylinen, 2003<br />
nov/02 Patients with<br />
<strong>neck</strong> or shoulder<br />
<strong>pain</strong> (no<br />
distinction)<br />
march/<br />
2004<br />
multidisciplinar traditional sick leave, <strong>pain</strong>,<br />
y rehabilitation <strong>treatment</strong> health‐related<br />
vs none: (medication, behavior, working<br />
physio, rest <strong>and</strong> conditions. 2 years<br />
active<br />
multidisciplinar<br />
y rehabilitation<br />
(physical<br />
training +<br />
education+info<br />
rmation+social<br />
interaction +<br />
work place<br />
visit).<br />
(multidisciplina<br />
ry<br />
rehabilitation<br />
with a<br />
psychologist<br />
working with<br />
patients,<br />
Multidisciplinar<br />
y rehabilitation<br />
with a<br />
psychologist<br />
coaching the<br />
team<br />
sick leave follow‐up<br />
adults >18years exercises (e.g.<br />
)<br />
other therapies <strong>pain</strong> , measures of<br />
or older, who <strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> or no<br />
function/disability,<br />
suffered from exercises, <strong>treatment</strong>(other patient satisfaction,<br />
acute (less than shoulder therapies e.g. global perceived<br />
30 days), exercises, neural effect.<br />
subacute (30 to active <strong>treatment</strong>,<br />
90 days) or exercises, anagesic,<br />
chronic (longer stretching, manual traction,<br />
than 90 days) strengthening, mobilisation,<br />
<strong>neck</strong> disorders. postural, electrical<br />
MND:<br />
functional, eye‐ stimulation,<br />
mechanical <strong>neck</strong> fixation, education, …<br />
disorders, proprioception applied alone or<br />
including WAD I‐ exercises, in cominiation)<br />
II, myofascial home<br />
<strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>, <strong>and</strong><br />
degenerative<br />
changes<br />
NDH: Neck<br />
disorders with<br />
headache<br />
NDR: Neck<br />
disorders with<br />
radicular<br />
findings<br />
exercises)<br />
Favouring <strong>treatment</strong><br />
Exercise vs control effect on <strong>pain</strong>:<br />
‐ McKinney, 1989 ‐0,77[‐1,20,‐0,35]<br />
‐ Jull, 2002 ‐0,75[‐1,17,‐0,34]<br />
‐ Jull, 2002 (45w follow‐up) ‐0,59[‐1,0,‐0,18]<br />
‐ Goldie, 1970 (3wfollow‐up) 0,42[0,21‐0,8]<br />
‐ Ylinen, 2003(52w<strong>treatment</strong>)0,52[0,37‐0,73]<br />
Exercise vs control effect on function:<br />
‐ Revel, 1994 (8w<strong>treatment</strong>+2wfollow‐up)<br />
0,55[0,33‐0,89]<br />
NNT <strong>and</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> advantage: <strong>pain</strong> relief with multimodal<br />
care.<br />
NNT Advantage%<br />
‐ Jull, 2002 5 40,8<br />
‐ Rosenfield, 2000 5 38<br />
‐ Skargren, 1997, 1998 4 26,1<br />
Based on the two trials (low<br />
methodological quality) it could not be<br />
shown that multidisciplinary<br />
rehabilitation is better than usual care.<br />
Exercise, both stretching <strong>and</strong>/or<br />
strengthening (of the cervical or shoulder<br />
region) <strong>and</strong> vertigo/eye‐fixation<br />
exercises, are more benneficial than no<br />
<strong>treatment</strong>.<br />
A multimodal care approach of exercise<br />
combined with mobilisations or<br />
manipulations for subacute <strong>and</strong> chronic<br />
MND with or without headache, reduced<br />
<strong>pain</strong>, improved function, <strong>and</strong> high global<br />
perceived effect in the short <strong>and</strong> long<br />
term.<br />
It is unclear what the relative benefit of<br />
exxercises therapy is when compared to<br />
other <strong>treatment</strong>s. the relative benefit of<br />
different exercise approaches is unclear.<br />
It was not possible to determine which<br />
technique or dosage was more beneficial<br />
or if certain subgroups benefit more from<br />
one form of care than another.