10.08.2013 Views

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ezzo J,<br />

Haraldsson BG,<br />

Gross AR, Myers<br />

CD, Morien A,<br />

Goldsmith CH,<br />

Bronfort G,<br />

Peloso PM:<br />

Massage for<br />

mechanical <strong>neck</strong><br />

disorders: A<br />

systematic<br />

review. Volume<br />

32. 2007:353-362.<br />

Gemmell H, Miller<br />

P: Comparative<br />

effectiveness of<br />

manipulation,<br />

mobilisation <strong>and</strong><br />

the Activator<br />

instrument in<br />

<strong>treatment</strong> of non<strong>specific</strong><br />

<strong>neck</strong><br />

<strong>pain</strong>: A<br />

systematic<br />

review. Volume<br />

14. 2006.<br />

42 <strong>Non</strong>-Specific Neck Pain: <strong>diagnosis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 119<br />

high (8) 2007 A systematic review<br />

to assess the effect of<br />

massage on <strong>pain</strong>,<br />

function, patient<br />

satisfaction, cost of<br />

care <strong>and</strong> adverse<br />

events in adults with<br />

<strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>.<br />

high (7) 2006 A systematic review<br />

to critically appraise<br />

the literature that<br />

directly compared<br />

manipulation,<br />

mobilisation <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Activator instrument<br />

for non‐<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong><br />

<strong>pain</strong>.<br />

1. Ammer <strong>and</strong> Rathkolb, 1990<br />

2. Brodin, 1985<br />

3. Cen, 2003<br />

4. Fialka, 1989<br />

5. Gam, 1998<br />

6. Hanten, 1997<br />

7. Hanten, 2000<br />

8. hou, 2002<br />

9. Hoving, 2002<br />

10. Irnich, 2001<br />

11. jordan, 1998<br />

12. Karlberg, 1996<br />

13. Koes, 1991‐1992)<br />

14. Kogstad, 1978<br />

15. Levoska, 1993<br />

16. Nilsson, 1995‐1997<br />

17. Provinciali, 1996<br />

18. Reginiussen, 2000<br />

19. Schnabel, 2002<br />

1. Vernon, 1990<br />

2. Cassidy, 1991<br />

3. Yurkiw, 1996<br />

4. Wood, 2001<br />

5. Hurwitz, 2002<br />

sept.<br />

2004<br />

oct.<br />

2005<br />

adults who cerveral<br />

suffered from masage<br />

acute (90 days). MND<br />

(with whiplash<br />

grade I‐II<br />

included), NDH<br />

<strong>and</strong> NDR<br />

(inclusion of<br />

whiplash grade<br />

III)<br />

patients<br />

suffering non‐<br />

<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong><br />

<strong>pain</strong>, age or<br />

duration of<br />

symptoms was<br />

not considered.<br />

techniques<br />

were included.<br />

Massage in<br />

multimodal<br />

approaches.<br />

Hig Velocity<br />

Low Amplitude<br />

rotational<br />

manipulation<br />

(HVLA‐rotation<br />

manipulation),<br />

oscillatory<br />

mobilisation,<br />

Activator,<br />

deversified<br />

HVLA<br />

manipulation,<br />

post isometric<br />

relaxation<br />

(PIR), HVLA<br />

manipulation<br />

with heat,<br />

HVLA<br />

manipulation<br />

without heat,<br />

HVLA with<br />

electrical<br />

stimulation,<br />

HVLA without<br />

electrical<br />

stimulation,<br />

obilisation with<br />

no <strong>treatment</strong>,<br />

other<br />

multimodal<br />

approaches, …<br />

the different<br />

<strong>treatment</strong><br />

modalities<br />

compared with<br />

each other<br />

effect on <strong>pain</strong>,<br />

function, patient<br />

satisfaction, cost of<br />

care <strong>and</strong> adverse<br />

events<br />

Pressure <strong>pain</strong><br />

treshold.<br />

Numerical rating<br />

scale (NRS) for <strong>pain</strong>.<br />

Cervical ROM.<br />

Cervical lateral<br />

flexion.<br />

VAS for <strong>pain</strong>.<br />

NRS for <strong>pain</strong>.<br />

Neck Disability<br />

index.<br />

SF‐36.<br />

Adverse reactions<br />

with care.<br />

Patient global<br />

assessment.<br />

inability to pool data. no level of evidence could be found for<br />

massage alone compared with a contral.<br />

No level of evidence could be found for<br />

or against massage in the studies that<br />

combined massage with other methods.<br />

No firm statement can be made about<br />

the efficacy of massage for <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong> due<br />

to the limitations of existing studies.<br />

not remlevant because of poor quality of included studies due to lack in quantity <strong>and</strong> quality of<br />

studies reviewed, more high‐quality<br />

research is needs to be done before a<br />

recommendation can be made as to<br />

which type of manual therapy has better<br />

effectiveness <strong>and</strong> safety profile for non‐<br />

<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> pai.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!