Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE
Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE
Non-specific neck pain: diagnosis and treatment - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ezzo J,<br />
Haraldsson BG,<br />
Gross AR, Myers<br />
CD, Morien A,<br />
Goldsmith CH,<br />
Bronfort G,<br />
Peloso PM:<br />
Massage for<br />
mechanical <strong>neck</strong><br />
disorders: A<br />
systematic<br />
review. Volume<br />
32. 2007:353-362.<br />
Gemmell H, Miller<br />
P: Comparative<br />
effectiveness of<br />
manipulation,<br />
mobilisation <strong>and</strong><br />
the Activator<br />
instrument in<br />
<strong>treatment</strong> of non<strong>specific</strong><br />
<strong>neck</strong><br />
<strong>pain</strong>: A<br />
systematic<br />
review. Volume<br />
14. 2006.<br />
42 <strong>Non</strong>-Specific Neck Pain: <strong>diagnosis</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 119<br />
high (8) 2007 A systematic review<br />
to assess the effect of<br />
massage on <strong>pain</strong>,<br />
function, patient<br />
satisfaction, cost of<br />
care <strong>and</strong> adverse<br />
events in adults with<br />
<strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong>.<br />
high (7) 2006 A systematic review<br />
to critically appraise<br />
the literature that<br />
directly compared<br />
manipulation,<br />
mobilisation <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Activator instrument<br />
for non‐<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong><br />
<strong>pain</strong>.<br />
1. Ammer <strong>and</strong> Rathkolb, 1990<br />
2. Brodin, 1985<br />
3. Cen, 2003<br />
4. Fialka, 1989<br />
5. Gam, 1998<br />
6. Hanten, 1997<br />
7. Hanten, 2000<br />
8. hou, 2002<br />
9. Hoving, 2002<br />
10. Irnich, 2001<br />
11. jordan, 1998<br />
12. Karlberg, 1996<br />
13. Koes, 1991‐1992)<br />
14. Kogstad, 1978<br />
15. Levoska, 1993<br />
16. Nilsson, 1995‐1997<br />
17. Provinciali, 1996<br />
18. Reginiussen, 2000<br />
19. Schnabel, 2002<br />
1. Vernon, 1990<br />
2. Cassidy, 1991<br />
3. Yurkiw, 1996<br />
4. Wood, 2001<br />
5. Hurwitz, 2002<br />
sept.<br />
2004<br />
oct.<br />
2005<br />
adults who cerveral<br />
suffered from masage<br />
acute (90 days). MND<br />
(with whiplash<br />
grade I‐II<br />
included), NDH<br />
<strong>and</strong> NDR<br />
(inclusion of<br />
whiplash grade<br />
III)<br />
patients<br />
suffering non‐<br />
<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong><br />
<strong>pain</strong>, age or<br />
duration of<br />
symptoms was<br />
not considered.<br />
techniques<br />
were included.<br />
Massage in<br />
multimodal<br />
approaches.<br />
Hig Velocity<br />
Low Amplitude<br />
rotational<br />
manipulation<br />
(HVLA‐rotation<br />
manipulation),<br />
oscillatory<br />
mobilisation,<br />
Activator,<br />
deversified<br />
HVLA<br />
manipulation,<br />
post isometric<br />
relaxation<br />
(PIR), HVLA<br />
manipulation<br />
with heat,<br />
HVLA<br />
manipulation<br />
without heat,<br />
HVLA with<br />
electrical<br />
stimulation,<br />
HVLA without<br />
electrical<br />
stimulation,<br />
obilisation with<br />
no <strong>treatment</strong>,<br />
other<br />
multimodal<br />
approaches, …<br />
the different<br />
<strong>treatment</strong><br />
modalities<br />
compared with<br />
each other<br />
effect on <strong>pain</strong>,<br />
function, patient<br />
satisfaction, cost of<br />
care <strong>and</strong> adverse<br />
events<br />
Pressure <strong>pain</strong><br />
treshold.<br />
Numerical rating<br />
scale (NRS) for <strong>pain</strong>.<br />
Cervical ROM.<br />
Cervical lateral<br />
flexion.<br />
VAS for <strong>pain</strong>.<br />
NRS for <strong>pain</strong>.<br />
Neck Disability<br />
index.<br />
SF‐36.<br />
Adverse reactions<br />
with care.<br />
Patient global<br />
assessment.<br />
inability to pool data. no level of evidence could be found for<br />
massage alone compared with a contral.<br />
No level of evidence could be found for<br />
or against massage in the studies that<br />
combined massage with other methods.<br />
No firm statement can be made about<br />
the efficacy of massage for <strong>neck</strong> <strong>pain</strong> due<br />
to the limitations of existing studies.<br />
not remlevant because of poor quality of included studies due to lack in quantity <strong>and</strong> quality of<br />
studies reviewed, more high‐quality<br />
research is needs to be done before a<br />
recommendation can be made as to<br />
which type of manual therapy has better<br />
effectiveness <strong>and</strong> safety profile for non‐<br />
<strong>specific</strong> <strong>neck</strong> pai.