status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

KCE Reports 76 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: status quo or quo vadis ? 65
58. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall MN. Research methods used in
developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326(7393):816-9.
59. Crampton P, Perera R, Crengle S, Dowell A, Howden-Chapman P, Kearns R, et al. What
makes a good performance indicator? Devising primary care performance indicators for New
Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2004;117(1191):U820.
60. Foy R, Eccles MP, Jamtvedt G, Young J, Grimshaw JM, Baker R. What do we know about
how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review. BMC
Health Serv Res. 2005;5:50.
61. Smith PC, York N. Quality incentives: the case of U.K. general practitioners. Health Affairs.
2004;23(3):112-8.
62. Lester H, Sharp DJ, Hobbs FD, Lakhani M. The quality and outcomes framework of the GMS
contract: a quiet evolution for 2006. British Journal of General Practice. 2006;56(525):244-6.
63. Campbell S, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Middleton E, Sibbald B, Roland M. Quality of primary
care in England with the introduction of pay for performance. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(2):181-
90.
64. Roland M. The Quality and Outcomes Framework: too early for a final verdict. Br J of Gen
Pract. 2007;57(540):525-7.
65. Roland M, Campbell S, Bailey N, Whalley D, Sibbald B. Financial incentives to improve the
quality of primary care in the UK: predicting the consequences of change. Primary Health
Care Research and development 2006;7:18-26.
66. Ashworth M, Armstrong D. The relationship between general practice characteristics and
quality of care: a national survey of quality indicators used in the UK Quality and Outcomes
Framework, 2004-5. BMC Family Practice. 2006;7:68.
67. McDonald R, Harrison S, Checkland K, Campbell S, Roland M. Impact of financial incentives
on clinical autonomy and internal motivation in primary care: ethnographic study. BMJ
2007;30(334):1357.
68. Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, Reeves D, Kontopantelis E, Hiroeh U, et al. Pay-forperformance
programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med.
2006;355(4):375-84.
69. Morgan CL, Beerstecher HJ. Primary care funding, contract status, and outcomes: an
observational study. British Journal of General Practice. 2006;56(532):825-9.
70. Wang Y, O'Donnell CA, Mackay DF, Watt GC. Practice size and quality attainment under
the new GMS contract: a cross-sectional analysis. British Journal of General Practice.
2006;56(532):830-5.
71. Williams PH, de Lusignan S. Does a higher 'quality points' score mean better care in stroke?
An audit of general practice medical records. Informatics in Primary Care. 2006;14(1):29-40.
72. Marshall M, Klazinga N, Leatherman S, Hardy C, Bergmann E, Pisco L, et al. OECD Health
Care Quality Indicator Project. The expert panel on primary care prevention and health
promotion. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2006;18 Suppl 1:21-5.
73. Engels Y, Campbell S, Dautzenberg M, van den Hombergh P, Brinkmann H, Szecsenyi J, et al.
Developing a framework of, and quality indicators for, general practice management in
Europe. Family Practice. 2005;22(2):215-22.
74. Elwyn G, Rhydderch M, Edwards A, Hutchings H, Marshall M, Myres P, et al. Assessing
organisational development in primary medical care using a group based assessment: the
Maturity Matrix. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(4):287-94.
75. Rhydderch M. Assessing organisational development in family practice. The Maturity Matrix
Nijmegen: University Nijmegen; 2006.
76. Brown C, Lilford R. Cross sectional study of performance indicators for English Primary Care
Trusts: testing construct validity and identifying explanatory variables. BMC Health Services
Research. 2006;6:81.