status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

64 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: status quo or quo vadis ? KCE Reports 76
39. Van Linden A, Heymans I, Mambourg F, Leys M, De Prins L, Dieleman P, et al. KCE reports
vol 9A: Feedback: Onderzoek naar de impact en barrières bij implementatie –
Onderzoeksrapport: deel 1. Brussel: Federaal kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg
(KCE); 2005. 2007/06/21 (Ref. D/2005/10.273/01) Available from:
40.
http://kce.fgov.be/index_nl.aspx?ID=0&SGREF=5270&CREF=5349
Contencin P, Falcoff H, Doumenc M. Review of performance assessment and improvement in
ambulatory medical care. Health Policy. 2006;77(1):64-75.
41. Tait AR. Clinical governance in primary care: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2004;13(6):723-
30.
42. King J, Wilson M. General Practice: Building on Quality. Identifying potential models for
primary clinical care for Australia Monash Institute of Public Health; 2001 January 2001.
Available from: http://www.qualitygp.com/downloads/BoQLitReview.doc
43. Rhydderch M, Edwards A, Elwyn G, Marshall M, Engels Y, Van den Hombergh P, et al.
Organizational assessment in general practice: a systematic review and implications for
quality improvement. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(4):366-78.
44. Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality
of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care.
2001;10(3):152-8.
45. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, et al. Effectiveness
and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology
Assessment. 2004;8(6):iii-72.
46. Holden JD. Systematic review of published multi-practice audits from British general practice.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):247-72.
47. Hearnshaw HM, Harker RM, Cheater FM, Baker RH, Grimshaw GM. Are audits wasting
resources by measuring the wrong things? A survey of methods used to select audit review
criteria. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(1):24-8.
48. McKay J, Bowie P, Lough M. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply
two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review. Journal of
Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2006;12(6):622-29.
49. Verstappen WHJM, van Merode F, Grimshaw J, Dubois WI, Grol RPTM, van der Weijden T.
Comparing cost effects of two quality strategies to improve test ordering in primary care: a
randomized trial. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2004;16(5):391-8.
50. van den Hombergh P, Engels Y, van den Hoogen HJM, van Doremalen J, van den Bosch
WJHM, Grol R. Saying 'goodbye' to single-handed practices; what do patients and staff lose
or gain? Family Practice. 2005;22(1):20-7.
51. Jelley D, Van Zwanenberg T. Practice-based peer appraisal in general practice: An idea whose
time has come? Education for Primary Care. 2003;14(3):329-37.
52. Fraser J. Evaluation of an interpractice visit peer review program for rural Australian general
practice registrars. Australian family physician. 2006;35(3):143-47.
53. Lawrence M, Olesen F. Indicators of Quality in health care. . Eur J Gen Pract 1997;3(3):103-8.
54. Roland M. Linking physicians' pay to the quality of care--a major experiment in the United
Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448-54.
55. Engels Y, Dautzenberg M, Campbell S, Broge B, Boffin N, Marshall M, et al. Testing a
European set of indicators for the evaluation of the management of primary care practices
Fam Pract. 2006;23(1):137-47.
56. Perera R, Dowell T, Crampton P, Kearns R. Panning for gold: An evidence-based tool for
assessment of performance indicators in primary health care. Health Policy. 2007;80:314-27.
57. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in
developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care.
2002;11(4):358-64.