10.08.2013 Views

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 76 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: <strong>status</strong> <strong>quo</strong> or <strong>quo</strong> <strong>vadis</strong> ? 37<br />

The measurement against those standards is carried out by two independent bodies i.e.,<br />

AGPAL (Australian General Practices Accreditation Limited, non-pr<strong>of</strong>it) and for-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

Quality Practice Accreditation Limited. 129 Practices need to register for accreditation<br />

and indicate when a survey visit can take place. Before the practice visit, the GP or the<br />

practice performs a self assessment. Two surveyors assess the practice against the<br />

standards, criteria and a range <strong>of</strong> indicators. These indicators mainly relate to the<br />

organisation and infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the practice.<br />

The accreditation body coordinates with the practice to find a mutually agreeable date<br />

and the practice is surveyed against the RACGP standards. Clinical indicators are not<br />

yet used except for some preventive measures like cervical smears and immunisation<br />

programmes, for which special remuneration is available and data centrally collected. 130<br />

In July 2003, 87% <strong>of</strong> practices in Australia had undertaken accreditation against the<br />

RACGP standards. 131 Some practices are in their third (three year) cycle. The costs are<br />

approximately 2200-2500 euros for a visit to a group practice. The practice<br />

accreditation leads to an increase <strong>of</strong> income. The practice is allowed to enrol in the<br />

Practice Incentive Programme that may increase the income by some 6300 euros.<br />

PRACTICE INCENTIVE PROGRAM<br />

Since 1998, Australia introduced the Practice Incentive Program, which <strong>of</strong>fers financial<br />

incentives to practices working towards accreditation. Payments relate to aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

general practice that contribute to quality care. These include the use <strong>of</strong> IT, provision <strong>of</strong><br />

after-hours care, student teaching and better prescribing. Practices in rural and remote<br />

locations gain additional subsidies. The payments relate to the number <strong>of</strong> patients but<br />

not to the number <strong>of</strong> consultations. This in turn <strong>of</strong>fers a gateway to remuneration <strong>of</strong><br />

services like information management and technology, after hours care and student<br />

teaching. 132<br />

AUDIT<br />

Audit is not <strong>of</strong> major importance in Australia.<br />

NETWORKS OF GENERAL PRACTICE<br />

Divisions are regional networks <strong>of</strong> GPs that <strong>of</strong>fer services to GPs and their practices.<br />

Australia has 120 Divisions. They work under the umbrella <strong>of</strong> the Australian General<br />

Practice Network. The Divisions <strong>of</strong> general practice play a fundamental role in the<br />

changes <strong>of</strong> general practice. In particular, quality development is their core business. 133<br />

Priority areas include governance, prevention, access to health care, supporting<br />

integration and multidisciplinary care, better management <strong>of</strong> chronic diseases, general<br />

practice support, quality support, consumer focus and Workforce support. 134<br />

2.4.5.3 Evidence for effectiveness<br />

In 2004 more than 2610 practices have taken re-accreditation. Raw data indicate that<br />

many items <strong>of</strong> their practice organisation improved. For instance 6,2 % <strong>of</strong> practices<br />

introduced a system to enhance the follow up <strong>of</strong> abnormal test results. 123<br />

An econometric analysis showed that there is a relation over time between the<br />

introduction <strong>of</strong> the Divisions and many improvements measured by performance<br />

indicators (for instance immunisation coverage, chronic disease management items,<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> practices receiving cervical sign payments). However, the data do not<br />

allow inferring any causal relationship. Division characteristics mostly relate to various<br />

measures <strong>of</strong> practice infrastructure. The budget devoted to the divisions was estimated<br />

about 5 euros per capita. 134<br />

2.4.5.4 Future developments<br />

The quality framework for Australian general practice introduces basics concepts for<br />

quality development like the creation <strong>of</strong> a climate oriented towards quality, advice to<br />

use indicators and peer review with a ‘no-blame culture’. Unlike the UK example this<br />

framework much more focuses on formative effects.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!