10.08.2013 Views

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 76 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: <strong>status</strong> <strong>quo</strong> or <strong>quo</strong> <strong>vadis</strong> ? 29<br />

are Diagnostic assessment in groups (DTO), Transmural joint agreements, assessment<br />

on prescriptions and treatment (FTTO) and Travel advice assessment groups.<br />

QUALITY BOX<br />

The quality box, designed for individual practices, aims at making a quick go through<br />

some aspects <strong>of</strong> the practice. The self-assessment topics include the use <strong>of</strong> a practice<br />

computer, practice organisation and some clinical indicators <strong>of</strong> chronic diseases. After a<br />

´quick scan´ the GP may choose some issues to work on. This Quality box is used for<br />

accrediting purposes, to select practices for vocational training or for selecting practices<br />

to allocate practice nurses (personal communication).<br />

PRACTICE ACCREDITATION<br />

The College supervise the organisation <strong>of</strong> the practice accreditation but an independent<br />

organisation has been installed in 2005.<br />

The practice accreditation is a three year process. The practice establishes first a<br />

relation with a practice consultant. The practice quality coordinator (doctor, manager<br />

or nurse practitioner) makes a plan with the practice-consultant. During one year, the<br />

practice collects data on:<br />

• Practice organisation,<br />

• Medical indicators,<br />

• Patient satisfaction.<br />

Efforts are required to improve data collection in order to measure the practice<br />

performance. This starts with the proper use <strong>of</strong> ICPC coding and the organisation <strong>of</strong><br />

medical records. The practice consultant reviews these data and suggests priority areas<br />

for improvement. The practice designs a provisional plan for improvement <strong>of</strong> identified<br />

substandard aspects and sends this plan to the practice consultant.<br />

After an agreement procedure between the practice coordinator, the team and the<br />

practice-consultant, they agree on a final plan. 108 Anonymous data are transmitted to<br />

the research centre WOK at the University <strong>of</strong> Nijmegen for analysis.<br />

Currently, about 400 practices (1000 GPs) have gone through the accreditation process<br />

and the NHG claims that over 10% <strong>of</strong> the population benefit from the care <strong>of</strong> an<br />

accredited practice. The cost <strong>of</strong> the accreditation procedure relates to the number <strong>of</strong><br />

patients in the practice and is about 6000 Euro per practice. 108 This is partly refunded<br />

by an increase <strong>of</strong> about one euro <strong>of</strong> the capitation fee. The incentive for the GPs is a<br />

quality label. Accreditation also results in points for mandatory re-certification (which is<br />

due every 5 years). Other incentives are the enthusiasm created within the team, better<br />

working relations and good public relations with patients and stakeholders. 108<br />

The indicators used are detailed in the appendix 6. The indicators cover e.g. all<br />

indicators used in the European Practice Assessment programme.<br />

2.4.3.3 Evidence for effectiveness<br />

Van den Hombergh and other authors concluded that the accreditation system based<br />

on indicators <strong>of</strong> organisation <strong>of</strong> a practice is feasible in the Dutch context. 109-111, 40 The<br />

practice visit method was effective in a controlled study comparing two strategies <strong>of</strong><br />

intervention (mutual visits and visits by a non-physician pr<strong>of</strong>essional).<br />

The clinical indicators were not part <strong>of</strong> the initial work <strong>of</strong> van den Homberg. They have<br />

been introduced using the work <strong>of</strong> Campbell et al. 112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!