status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

136 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: status quo or quo vadis ? KCE Reports 76 APPENDIX 12: ILLUSTRATION OF A POSSIBLE COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGY FOR IMPLEMENTING A QUALITY INITIATIVE: FLU VACCINATION Professionalism Priority on national coverage with major role of National Regional Practice Individual GP GP Patient focus National public campaigns Competence National guidelines and indicators Capacity Central Dispensing vaccination, collaboration with nurses Knowledge and information management associations Immunization procedures and focusing the high risk group Defining the role of regional and local levels Regional campaigns Regional consensus building activities Involving regional support centers for selection and mailing Regional support by IT educational activities Financing Target payments Regional support centers are set up and paid Defining the role of practices Practice information system for ex by leaflets or patient listing Practice procedures Involving practice partners and assistants Annual report on outcomes Practices are reimbursed by coverage (outcome) Define the role of the individual GP Reminders, notes on record, individual information Individual CME, Credit points Dedicated time for management activities Feedback data used by GPs GPs get money for value
KCE Reports 76 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: status quo or quo vadis ? 137 APPENDIX 13: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS Aqua Institute Commercial independent body offering EPA practice accreditation ANAES Agence Nationale de l’Accréditation et de l’Evaluation en Santé BNP Bruto Nationaal Product CEBAM Belgian centre for evidence based medicine CME Continuing Medical Education CNPQ Le Conseil national de promotion de la qualité CPD Continuing professional development CRAQ Cellule de Réflexion à l’Amélioration de la Qualité DM Domus Medica vzw EFQM European Foundation for Quality Management EKWA Evaluation of Quality, a project of the scientific org EPA European Practice Assessment EUROPEP European instrument for patient evaluation of general practice care EQuiP European Association for Quality in General Practice/Family Medicine GLEM Groupements Locaux d’Evaluation Médicale GP General Practitioner HAS Haute Autorité de la Santé ICHO Interuniversitair Centrum of Huisartsenopleiding INAMI Institut national d’assurance maladie invalidité KCE Kenniscentrum LOK Lokaal Kwaliteitsoverleg (peer review) NHG Nederlands Huisarts Genootschap NHS National Health Service (UK) NICE National Institute of Clinical Excellence(UK) NRKP Nationale Raad voor Kwaliteitspromotie OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PDSA cycle Plan Do Study Act cycle PDCA cycle Plan Do Check Act cycle QA Quality Assurance QEP Qualität und Entwicklung in Praxen QD Quality Development QI Quality Improvement QOF Quality Outcomes Framework (UK) RIZIV/INAMI Rijksinstituut voor ziekte en invaliditeitsverzekering/ Institut National d’Assurance Maladie-Invalidité RMO Références Médicales Opposables SSMG Société Scientifique de Médecine Générale UA University of Antwerp UCL Université Catholique de Louvain URCAM Union Régionale des Caisses d’Assurance-Maladie URML Union régionale des Médecins Libéraux WONCA World Organisation of Family Doctors WOK Centre of Quality Care Research (Nijmegen, the Netherlands)
Page 1 and 2:
Kwaliteitsbevordering in de huisart
Page 3 and 4:
Kwaliteitsbevordering in de huisart
Page 5:
Hoe refereren naar dit document? Re
Page 8 and 9:
ii Kwaliteitsbevordering in de huis
Page 10 and 11:
iv Kwaliteitsbevordering in de huis
Page 12 and 13:
vi Kwaliteitsbevordering in de huis
Page 15 and 16:
KCE Reports 76 Quality development
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
21 Quality development in general p
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
KCE Reports Quality development in
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100: KCE Reports 76 Quality development
Page 149: Health policy KCE Reports 76 Qualit
Page 154 and 155: Wettelijk depot : D/2008/10.273/18
Page 156 and 157: 38. Baarmoederhalskankerscreening e
show all

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?