10.08.2013 Views

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>KCE</strong> Reports 76 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: <strong>status</strong> <strong>quo</strong> or <strong>quo</strong> <strong>vadis</strong> ? 1<br />

Table <strong>of</strong> contents<br />

Scientific Summary<br />

1 INTRODUCTION: QUALITY IN GENERAL PRACTICE 3<br />

1.1 CORE COMPETENCES OF GENERAL PRACTICE 3<br />

1.2 ACCOUNTABILITY IN HEALTH CARE 4<br />

1.3 QUALITY IN GENERAL PRACTICE 4<br />

1.3.1 General definitions 4<br />

1.3.2 Improving quality in general practice: the quality cycle 6<br />

1.3.3 Methods for improving quality in general practice 7<br />

1.3.4 Levels <strong>of</strong> quality development initiatives 8<br />

1.4 QUALITY DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL PRACTICE IN BELGIUM 9<br />

1.4.1 Legal framework 9<br />

1.4.2 Quality development initiatives in the Belgian context <strong>of</strong> general practice 9<br />

1.4.3 Evaluation <strong>of</strong> the outcomes <strong>of</strong> Continuous Medical Education, LOKs/GLEMs and<br />

feedbacks in Belgium 10<br />

1.5 CHALLENGE TODAY AND OBJECTIVE OF THIS REPORT 11<br />

1.6 STRUCTURE OF THIS REPORT 11<br />

2 QUALITY SYSTEM IN GENERAL PRACTICE: ANALYSIS OF FIVE SELECTED COUNTRIES 12<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION 12<br />

2.2 METHODOLOGY 12<br />

2.2.1 Selection <strong>of</strong> the countries 12<br />

2.2.2 Search strategy in electronic databases 12<br />

2.2.3 Grey literature: electronic sources and additional information on the selected<br />

countries 13<br />

2.3 RESULTS OF THE LITERATURE STUDY 13<br />

2.3.1 Selected reviews and papers 13<br />

2.3.2 Description <strong>of</strong> the selected reviews 14<br />

2.3.3 Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> peer reviews, practice visits and audits 15<br />

2.3.4 Quality indicators 15<br />

2.3.5 Precursors, enablers and incentives for implementing a quality development<br />

framework 16<br />

2.3.6 The Quality Outcomes Framework in the UK 16<br />

2.3.7 Pan European initiatives 17<br />

2.3.8 Lack <strong>of</strong> evidence on the effects <strong>of</strong> quality initiatives on outcomes at the patient level 18<br />

2.3.9 Limitations <strong>of</strong> the literature study 19<br />

2.3.10 Discussion <strong>of</strong> the literature search 19<br />

2.4 DESCRIPTION OF THE QUALITY SYSTEM IN THE FIVE SELECTED COUNTRIES 20<br />

2.4.1 France 22<br />

2.4.2 Germany 25<br />

2.4.3 The Netherlands 28<br />

2.4.4 United Kingdom 30<br />

2.4.5 Australia 34<br />

2.5 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE ANALYSIS OF FIVE COUNTRIES 38<br />

2.5.1 Steppingstones for a quality framework: a vision based on a national policy 40<br />

2.5.2 The components <strong>of</strong> a quality framework 40<br />

2.5.3 Purpose <strong>of</strong> the system: summative and formative use 40<br />

2.5.4 Pro and contras <strong>of</strong> clinical indicators: the UK experience 40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!