10.08.2013 Views

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

status quo of quo vadis? - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 Quality development in general practice in Belgium: <strong>status</strong> <strong>quo</strong> or <strong>quo</strong> <strong>vadis</strong> ? <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 76<br />

Brown 2006{Brown,<br />

2006 #236}<br />

Doran 2006{Doran,<br />

2006 #71}<br />

Engels 2006{Engels,<br />

2006 #527}<br />

Fraser 2006{Fraser,<br />

2006 #535}<br />

Cross sectional<br />

study <strong>of</strong><br />

performance<br />

indicators for<br />

English Primary<br />

Care Trusts:<br />

testing construct<br />

validity and<br />

identifying<br />

explanatory<br />

variables<br />

Pay-forperformance<br />

programs in<br />

family practices in<br />

the United<br />

Kingdom<br />

Testing a<br />

European set <strong>of</strong><br />

indicators for the<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

management <strong>of</strong><br />

primary care<br />

practices<br />

Evaluation <strong>of</strong> an<br />

inter-practice<br />

visit peer review<br />

program for rural<br />

Australian<br />

general practice<br />

registrars<br />

UK Secondary analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the aggregated QOF<br />

scores <strong>of</strong> GPs with 6<br />

Performance<br />

Indicators in 303<br />

English primary Care<br />

Trusts.<br />

UK Secondary analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the QOF scores and<br />

exception rates per<br />

condition. QOF<br />

scores were<br />

correlated with socio<br />

demographic data <strong>of</strong><br />

GPs and practices.<br />

Europe Validation and<br />

feasibility study in 9<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> a<br />

European instrument<br />

<strong>of</strong> practice<br />

management and<br />

organization.<br />

Australia Qualitative analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

a project where<br />

consultations <strong>of</strong> GPs<br />

were observed by<br />

peers in 18 practices.<br />

In the UK Primary<br />

Care Trusts are the<br />

umbrella <strong>of</strong> GPs in a<br />

region.<br />

Within the QOF it<br />

shows that there is<br />

some correlation<br />

between the QOF<br />

scores and patient<br />

satisfaction but not<br />

with other measures.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this<br />

analysis provide little<br />

evidence that the<br />

current indicators<br />

have sufficient<br />

construct validity to<br />

measure the<br />

underlying concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> quality, except<br />

when the specific<br />

area <strong>of</strong> screening is<br />

considered.<br />

The median<br />

reported and claims<br />

achievement was<br />

83,4 percent. Sociodemographic<br />

effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> both practices and<br />

patients had<br />

moderate but<br />

significant effects.<br />

Exception reporting<br />

was high in a about 1<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> practices.<br />

These practices<br />

should be<br />

monitored.<br />

57 indicators were<br />

found to be valid in<br />

all countries. In<br />

some countries<br />

resistance was<br />

reported among<br />

practice staff but<br />

could be overcome.<br />

Procedures were<br />

sometimes slowly<br />

implemented.<br />

The visitor learns.<br />

No data on the<br />

observed GP.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!