ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services
ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services
ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
could be a health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional or <strong>of</strong>fice staff, someone who might interact directly<br />
with Certified EHR Technology or that it could also be s<strong>of</strong>tware program or service.<br />
D. Final Rule Amendments to Adopted Standards, Implementation Specifications, and<br />
Certification Criteria §§170.202, 170.205, 170.207, 170.210, 170.302, 170.304, 170.306<br />
1. Flexibility and Innovation<br />
Comments. Many commenters requested that we provide more flexibility in the<br />
<strong>final</strong> rule to accommodate new developments in HIT. These commenters agreed with our<br />
approach to identify minimum standards for certain code sets and they recommended a<br />
similar approach for other standards. Some commenters suggested alternative<br />
approaches to adopting standards, such as adopting standards at a higher level <strong>of</strong><br />
abstraction (e.g., HL7 2.x, where “x” could be any version within the version 2 family)<br />
and accompanying the adopted standards with detailed implementation specifications or<br />
guidance outside <strong>of</strong> the rulemaking process.<br />
Response. We appreciate commenters’ support for the “minimum standard”<br />
approach that we established in the Interim Final Rule. We believe that code sets are an<br />
appropriate type <strong>of</strong> standard to set as a “minimum.” In the Temporary Certification<br />
Program <strong>final</strong> rule, we discuss the approaches available to the Secretary to identify and<br />
accept newer versions <strong>of</strong> adopted minimum code set standards. Below, we discuss how<br />
we have added flexibility into this <strong>final</strong> rule and how we can add flexibility in future<br />
rulemakings.<br />
In many cases, however, our flexibility may be limited due to legal requirements<br />
to adopt substantive requirements through following the procedures <strong>of</strong> the Administrative<br />
Procedure Act (APA). Depending upon the circumstances and subject matter, we may<br />
Page 37 <strong>of</strong> 228