10.08.2013 Views

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

ehr onc final certification - Department of Health Care Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Page 101 <strong>of</strong> 228<br />

Unchanged<br />

Comment. One commenter explicitly noted its support for this <strong>certification</strong><br />

criterion. We received other comments that included some mention <strong>of</strong> “access” but did<br />

not expressly focus on the <strong>certification</strong> criterion or provide any related suggestions or<br />

recommendations.<br />

Response. We appreciate the comment supporting this <strong>certification</strong> criterion.<br />

This <strong>certification</strong> criterion remains unchanged from the <strong>certification</strong> criterion adopted in<br />

the Interim Final Rule.<br />

§170.302(p) - Emergency access<br />

Meaningful Use Stage 1<br />

Objective<br />

Protect electronic health<br />

information created or<br />

maintained by the<br />

certified EHR technology<br />

through the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

appropriate technical<br />

capabilities<br />

Meaningful Use Stage 1<br />

Measure<br />

Conduct or review a security<br />

risk analysis per 45 CFR<br />

164.308 (a)(1) and<br />

implement security updates<br />

as necessary and correct<br />

identified security<br />

deficiencies as part <strong>of</strong> its risk<br />

management process<br />

Certification Criterion<br />

Interim Final Rule Text:<br />

Emergency access. Permit authorized users<br />

(who are authorized for emergency<br />

situations) to access electronic health<br />

information during an emergency.<br />

Final Rule Text:<br />

§170.302(p)<br />

Unchanged<br />

Comment. One commenter asked that we clarify the circumstances that would<br />

qualify as an “emergency” and further clarify whether compliance with this <strong>certification</strong><br />

criterion is intended to pre-empt conflicting or stricter state laws that may limit this type<br />

<strong>of</strong> access or require patient consent. Further, the commenter questioned whether we were<br />

implying that some authorized users <strong>of</strong> Certified EHR Technology would not be<br />

authorized for emergency situations or whether we intended for any authorized user to be<br />

entitled to access in an emergency situation. Finally, another commenter requested<br />

clarification as to whether emergency access is driven by organizational policies and<br />

whether capturing such access in an audit log is appropriate.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!