10.08.2013 Views

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 110. gm value versus C values to reach the low end of the TV band<br />

Hence, the choice of the transconductance value gm is particularly critical. The use of<br />

low gm values means a high filter noise. On the contrary, the use of a too high gm would result<br />

in the use of larger capacitors to reach 45MHz and in a poor linearity. To limit Cmax to less<br />

than 50pF, gm specification is limited to 13mS. That is why we specify that the<br />

transconductance value should be as high as possible, in the limit of 13mS, and fulfil the<br />

20dBm linearity level previously discussed.<br />

Furthermore, the voltage gain gm.r0 has to be high enough to reach the <strong>de</strong>sired filter<br />

quality factor. If r0 is too low, most of the output current flows through it and not through the<br />

capacitance, <strong>de</strong>grading the functionality of the filter. In<strong>de</strong>ed, it has been shown previously<br />

that for <strong>Gm</strong>-cells with r0 as output resistance and gm1=gm2=gm, the quality factor is given by<br />

the formula:<br />

r 1<br />

= g . (<strong>III</strong>.29)<br />

0 Q + 2<br />

2 r0<br />

Hence, this gives the required r0 value:<br />

( 2Q)<br />

m<br />

2<br />

2<br />

m<br />

−1<br />

r0<br />

= . (<strong>III</strong>.30)<br />

g<br />

- 94 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!