10.08.2013 Views

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Topologies comparison<br />

for a same Q-factor and f0<br />

Figure 53. Comparison of fourth or<strong>de</strong>r bandpass filters<br />

Figure 54. H3 and N+5 rejections according to the fourth or<strong>de</strong>r topology<br />

Despite a higher selectivity than second or<strong>de</strong>r bandpass, these filters are constituted<br />

with four or more reactive elements, leading to a more complex circuit. In particular, the<br />

frequency tuning requires keeping the sets of coefficient of the transfer function constant, as<br />

said for low-pass high or<strong>de</strong>r filters. As explained, to minimize the number of reactive<br />

elements in the circuit, a second or<strong>de</strong>r bandpass filter is preferred to higher or<strong>de</strong>r bandpass<br />

filters.<br />

Furthermore, Figure 55 <strong>de</strong>picts the use of a second or<strong>de</strong>r bandpass filters tuned in<br />

frequency at constant Q-factor or at a constant-BW, and the achieved rejections are in line<br />

with the or<strong>de</strong>r of magnitu<strong>de</strong> of the required specifications.<br />

- 45 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!