10.08.2013 Views

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

III. Gm-C Filtering - Epublications - Université de Limoges

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 43. Second or<strong>de</strong>r Low-pass Filters Topologies<br />

Figure 44. H3 and N+5 rejections according to the second or<strong>de</strong>r topology<br />

II.1.b.ii Assessment of the Topology<br />

The major advantage of low-pass filters is their ability to reject harmonic frequencies.<br />

For a given filter, the rejection of harmonic frequencies remains constant while tuning the cutoff<br />

frequency, as it may be observed in Figure 42.<br />

However, as it may also be seen in Figure 42, first and second or<strong>de</strong>r filters do not<br />

reach the <strong>de</strong>sired 20dB H3 and H5 rejection. A third or<strong>de</strong>r is then required, meaning at least<br />

three reactive elements. Tuning the cut-off frequency by tuning the reactive elements values<br />

while keeping a constant set of coefficient in the transfer function may become difficult as<br />

well.<br />

This graph in Figure 42 also highlights the poor adjacent channels rejection of lowpass<br />

filters, especially when reaching high frequencies: less than 1dB rejection of the N+5 at<br />

500MHz., even for third or<strong>de</strong>r topologies Furthermore, adjacent channels located below the<br />

cut-off frequency are amplified by up to 3dB.<br />

- 39 -<br />

Topologies comparison<br />

for a same fc

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!